HomeMy WebLinkAbout2660022 - Submission - [E] Richard BaxterSubmission Details
Submitter
Name Richard Baxter
Address Valleyview House Rooskey Monaghan H18 FY99
Note
In relation to application
File Number 2660022
Name Gilsenan Paul
Address Coolshannagh/Roosky, Monaghan, Co. Monaghan RECEIVED: 02/03/2026
Submitter: Richard Baxter, Valleyview House, Rooskey, Monaghan, H18 FY99
Date: 4th January 2025
To the Planning Department, Monaghan County Council
Re: Planning Application Reference Number: 2560472 Applicant: Paul Gilsenan
Location: Rooskey/ Coolshannagh, Monaghan
To Whom It May Concern,
I wish to make a formal submission/observation regarding the above planning application for
the construction of a glamping pod site at the location referenced above. I have enclosed the
statutory fee of €20.
I am objecting to this development on the grounds that it is contrary to the proper planning
and sustainable development of the area, specifically for the following reasons:
1. Impact on Residential Amenity (Noise and Disturbance)
The proposed development is situated in an established residential area. The introduction of a
commercial tourism enterprise here is incompatible with the character of the immediate
vicinity.
• Noise Nuisance: Unlike permanent residents, the proposed glamping use involves a
transient population. This significantly increases the potential for late-night noise and
socialising, which would negatively impact the quiet enjoyment of our property.
• Lack of Mitigation: I note that the application includes no specific noise mitigation
measures or management plan to control the behaviour of guests.
• Security: The regular turnover of short-term rental guests every weekend creates
security concerns for the permanent residents, changing the safe, settled nature of this
community.
2. Traffic Hazard and Pedestrian Safety
I have serious concerns regarding road safety. The road serving the site is already heavily
used by pedestrians, specifically those accessing the nearby local Monaghan Town
Greenway.
• Pedestrian Risk: The proposed development will increase vehicular traffic on this
road. The submitted plans show a lack of pedestrian provision (such as footpaths or
lighting) to handle this conflict between increased tourist traffic and vulnerable road
users.
• Safety: This poses an unacceptable safety risk to my family, neighbours, and walkers
using the amenity.
3. Overlooking and Loss of Privacy RECEIVED: 02/03/2026
The positioning of the proposed pods and associated areas will directly overlook my property.
• Visual Intrusion: The development will result in a direct loss of privacy for my
household. The nature of glamping sites, where guests spend significant time
outdoors, exacerbates this issue compared to standard residential housing. This level
of overlooking is unacceptable in a residential zone. The glamping pods will be in
close proximity to my property, between 10 and 20 metres away across the road.
When the trees are cut back there will be a clear line of vision from my house to the
glamping site.
4. Unsuitable Location for Tourism
While I support tourism generally, this specific site is unsuitable for such a facility.
• Disconnect from amenities: The site is located along the main N2 road and is
removed from identified, visible tourism clusters/facilities.
• Zoning Conflict: Placing a holiday park facility in a location dominated by
residential housing and main road traffic represents uncoordinated development. It
does not integrate well with the existing pattern of development in the area.
Conclusion
For the reasons outlined above—specifically the noise impact, traffic danger to Monaghan
greenway users, loss of privacy, and inappropriate location—I respectfully request that the
Planning Authority refuse permission for this application.
Yours faithfully,
Richard Baxter RECEIVED: 02/03/2026