Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2634 - Other AssessmentsMONAGHAN LOCAL AUTHORITIES- Water Protection Plan Checkli5tREF. r-. NO. (To ---- (To be accompanied by a Site Drainage Plan - Refer to Chapter 4 [\Iopaga 9ounty Development Plan 2013-2019) - General Site and Water Body Details co. COIJI Planning Ref. No. 'eu 7.9 Applicant Townland Water Supply Source *.k er X Co-ordinate 1 ►at.� Y Co-ordinate G5 -7 WMU 2 y RWB 2 al . , Co. C WB Status 2 Objective 2 Groundwater Vulnerability3 Aquifer Importance 3 ' 6 '.r •,< s� N; S E y j Proximity to nearest watercourse (culverted or open), wetland or Ia e Distance in metres) 7 l o o APR 2026 Proposed Development Is the development entirely or part of one of the folio ing? (tick) Domestic dwelling Agricultural (cattle/dairy) Industrial -f Public Works Agricultural (mushrooms) Industrial -non food Housing Agricultural (poultry) Quarrying/extractive industries Institutional Agricultural (piggery) Transport related CommSrc:al/Retail- Other agricultural - specify below Fillinn G±sting(Fi el depot Mixed Use Development Other Waste Water Production and Treatment Method Domestic type waste waters Waste waters produced from any trade, food, preparation or business 4 Wheel wash, vehicle wash, cooling waters Waste waters produced from quarrying etc 4 Other waste waters Construction phase waste waters Frequently asked questions for septic tanks may assist in the "fit for purpose" assessment refer to http://www.monaghan.ie/en/services/environment/water/waterawareness/faaforseotictanks/ Fuel or Outdoor Material Storage for Non Domestic Developments Number of fuel storage tanks existing or proposed on site? Are fuel storage tanks bunded ? Detail liquid / feedstuffs / organic / chemical / waste oil storage on outdoor sites Hard Surface and Open Yard Areas for Non Domestic Developments Footprint of proposed development including yard areas in m2 15770 Is there potential for soiled yard areas from material, product waste or manure handling, fuel dispensing, silt and soil, yard washing etc. If yes, are silt trap(s), interceptor(s), soiled water tanks or other control measures shown on drainage plan? Has the use of SUDS (Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems — http://www.susdrain.org ) been considered in the design of this development? Development History - All Developments I Have previous ollution revention plannng conditions been complied with v? Does existing development have an up to date (as constructed) site drainage plan? Is the existing/ roposed development sewered or unsewered? is the existing wastewater treatment system fit for purpose ? If unsewered, Has the storm water drainage system been examined and/or surveyed for leaflet available from Environment Section) misconnections? (Information Checklist of items to be included on Site Drainage Plan Location of lakes, watercourse, wells used for water supply, or karst features on or 100m of non domestic development site J ILU within 25m of domestic or Location of all drainage outfall points Foul water drainage system (in Red) Storm water drainage system (in Blue) Soiled yard area, soiled water drainage and management system, including silt traps, oil interceptor(s) and any SUDS facilities I N Location of waste water treatment facilities Location of fuel storage tank(s) Stream/Lake/Wetland/Riparian Corridors Footnotes and Useful Information Projection in the Irish Grid WMU, RWB, WB status. Objectives available on water ma sat www.wfdireland.ie Available in the public mapping section at www.gsi.ie For information leaflets on Business Premises and Proper Use of Drains and information on discharge licensing see: htt://www.mona han.ie/contentv3/services/environment/forms uidesdocumentsdowniands/ http //www monaghan ie/contentv3/services/environemtn/water/waterawareness/leaftletsandgui QE;III ICJ/ Guidance: www.envirocentre.ie Best practice for Oil Storage (BPGCS Has certification of installation for previously granted wastewater treatment system been required and if so has it been submitted. Refer to EPA Guidance at: http //wwwmonaghan ie/contentv3/services/environment/water/waterawareness/fagforsepticta nks/ and htt ://www-mona han.ie/contentv3/media/mona hanie/content/files/ df/environment/Water Pollution&DrainageSystems.pdf Refer to Water Body, Sensitive Waters and Sensitive Land Maps in Chapter 4 of the Monaghan County Development Plan 2013-2019 Abbreviations WMU Water Management Unit RWB River Water Body WB Status Water Body Status IPPC Integrated Pollution Prevention Control Licence EIA Environmental Impact Assessment For Office Use: Sensitivity of Location Is the development located upstream of a high river quality site ? Is the development located within a good status waterbody ? Is the development located in the catchment of a water supply source ? Is the development located within the Source Protection Zone (SPZ) of a groundwater supply source a? Does the development require a discharge licei Ire to surface or ground waters under the Water Pollution Acts? Risk to waters in relation to scale of development, previous planning/environmental history, IPPC or EIA aspects, site management and location in a sensitive area _ Applicant: 36 -P -Y- I 1/.Q., c� Date `z3 -4 �LO2C' Agent:, r )'t"V Nk� - Water Management Solutions HER. NO. N°2/34 AquaCoreOSustairiab► SAN c®. OUNceL Drainage Systems Reliable and trusted surface water management solutions E EL {� s } klargester.ie !VON. U. CO. PLANNING SECTION 2 3 APR 2026 Treat, Store and Control Klargester's AquaCore® range is suitable for multiple applications, on and off -mains. TREAT STORE CONTROL • AquaTreat AquaOil AquaHold Hillmaster Full Retention AquaOil full Master and PU vertical and Bypass GRP retention MDPE Storage Tanks and PC Surface Water and GRP horizontal Treatment separators/ range Separators bypass MDPE and GRP separators 5 4/23/26, 12:04 PM KlargesterAquaOil Full Retention MDPE & Full Retention GRP Separator I Kingspan IE OVERVIEW Legislation, Standards and Codes DOWNLOADS Technical Information • Third -party certified to EN858 - 1 for peace of mind • CE -marked Applications • Garage Forecourts • Car Parks • Workshops • Supermarket /Shopping Centres • Distribution Warehouses • Car Wash Bays • Scrap Yards • Car Garages • Fuel Storage Sites • Distribution/Haulage Centres • Waste Transfer Sites • Business/Commercial Parks/Industrial Estate X X Technical Information X Full retention separators treat the full flow that can be delivered by the drainage system, which is normally equivalent to the flow generated by a rainfall intensity of 65mm/hr. On large sites, some short term flooding may be an acceptable means of limiting the flow rate and hence the size of full retention systems. Base Base Manhole Min. Drainage Silt Oil to to Product Flow Length Diameter Cover Inlet Area Capacity Capacity Inlet Outlet Code (I/s) (mm) (mm) Dimensions Inve. (m2) (Itrs) (Itrs) Invert invert (mm) (mrc (mm) (mm) NSFP003 3 170 300 30 1700 1350 600 1410 1335 550 https://www.kingspan.com/ie/en/products/water-managemenVfuel-and-oil-separators/full-retention-separators/?s=t 1/5 4/23/26, 12:04 PM Klargester AquaOil Full Retention MOPE & Full Retention GRP Separator I Kingspan IF NSFA010 10 555 1000 100 2610 1225 600 1050 1000 500 NSFA015 15 835 1500 150 3910 1225 600 1050 1000 500 NSFA020 20 1115 2000 200 3230 2010 600 1810 1760 100C NISFA030 30 1670 3000 300 3960 2010 600 1810 1760 100C NSFA040 40 2225 4000 400 4750 2010 600 1810 1760 100C NSFA050 50 2780 5000 500 5790 2010 600 1810 1760 1005 NSFA065 65 3160 6500 650 7360 2010 600 1810 1760 100C NSFA080 80 4445 8000 800 5744 2820 600 2500 2450 1005 NSFA100 100 5560 10000 1000 6200 2820 600 2500 2450 100C NSFA125 125 6945 12500 1250 7365 2820 600 2500 2450 100C NSFA150 150 8335 15000 1500 8675 2820 600 2550 2450 100C NSFA175 175 9725 17500 1750 9975 2820 600 2550 2450 100C NSFA200 200 11110 20000 2000 11280 2820 600 2550 2450 1000 NSFA210 210 11667 21000 2100 11994 2820 600 2550 2450 100C NSFA225 225 12500 22500 2250 12766 2820 600 2550 2450 100C NSFA240 240 13333 24000 2400 13528 2820 600 2550 2450 1005 https://www.kingspan.com/ie/en/products/water-management/fuel-and-oii-separators/full-retention-separators/?s=t 2/5 4/23/26,12:04 PM KlargesterAquaOil Full Retention MDPE & Full Retention GRP Separator I Kingspan IE NSFA270 270 15000 27000 2700 15071 2820 600 2550 2450 100C NSFA285 285 15833 28500 2850 15833 2820 600 2550 2450 100' • Our units have been tested at their maximum flow rate (10 I/s), unlike some products which have been tested based on bypass and therefore only 10% of the flow. This ensures total accuracy of our silt retention results, by replicating the full effect of the silt wash through. • AquaOil full retention MDPE and GRP separators/bypass MDPE and GRP separators are classified as effective spill containment systems that meets the EN 858-1 Class I effluent targets at low flow rates. • HVO Ready* 'Also suitable for Midel Oil Sustainable Water Managing Floodwater Management - The with Sustainable Drainage complete picture Systems (SuDS) Knowledge Article 6 min read 3 min read Knowledge Article 6 min read https://www.l(ingspan.com/ie/en/products/water-management/fuel-and-oil-separators/full-retention-separators/?s=t 3/5 4/23/26, 12:04 PM Klargester AquaOil Full Retention MDPE & Full Retention GRP Separator I Kingspan IE General Enquiry Service & Maintenance Enquiry https://www.kingspan.com/ie/en/products/water-management/fuel-and-oil-separators/full-retention-separators/?s=t 4/5 SITE SURVEY FOR BLACKHILL GAA BY NIALL MC KENNA SCALE 1/500 DATE 12/2/2025 KINNAGIN TD Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan SITE SPECIFIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT ruzronrn4'ntal Ltcl. AT KINNAGIN CASTLEBLAYNEY CO. MONAGHAN Prepared for Blackhill GFC Prepared by Traynor Environmental Ltd Reference Number 25.664 TE Date of Issue 10th April 2026 PLANNING DF°tA REP. NO. 2I34 4 A` J N CO. COUNCIL Belturbet Business Park, Creeny. Belturbet, Co Cavan T: + 353 49 9522236 E: nevin@traynorenv.com www.traynorenvironmental.ie Date Details Prepared by Checked/Approved by 1 10"h April 2026 Final Francis Mc Mahon Environmental Consultant Nevin Traynor Environmental Scientist Project Title: Flood Risk Assessment Client: Blackhill GFC Office Reference: 25.664 TE Status: Final Date: 10th April 2026 Technical Reviewer Signature Nevin Traynor Environmental Scientist Date: 10th April 2026 Traynor Environmental Belturbet Business Park Creeny Belturbet Co. Cavan H14AY94 Tel: 049 9522236 Email: Info@traynorenvironmental.ie © This Report is the copyright of Traynor Environmental Ltd. Any unauthorized reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. 2 Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan CONTENT 2.1 Staged Process 2.2 Definition of Flood Zones 2.3 Vulnerability Classifications 2.4 Justification Test 3.1 General 3.2 Hydrology 3.3 Soils & Geology 3.4 Bedrock Geology 3.5 Groundwater Aquifer Classification & Vulnerability 4.1 Review of Available Data Sets & Potential Sources of Flooding 4.2 Stage 1 Conclusion 5.1 Coastal Flooding 5.2 Pluvial Flooding 6.1 Site Investigation 6.2 Design Rainfall Calculation 6.3 Pluvial flooding - SITE LAYOUT - MONAGHAN COUNTY COUNCIL FLOOD ZONES MAP 3 Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan Blackhill GFC has submitted a planning application seeking permission for the development of a new training field, floodlighting, all-weather playing court, upgraded entrance onto the public road, and associated car -parking and drainage works. Monaghan County Council, through Further Information Request Item No. 3 (Planning Reference 2520), has requested a Site -Specific Flood Risk Assessment to address concerns identified in national pluvial flood mapping. The Council requires clear evidence that the proposed development: • will not be at risk of flooding, and • will not increase flood risk elsewhere. Traynor Environmental Ltd was appointed to prepare this Flood Risk Assessment in accordance with The Planning System and Flood Risk Management Guidelines for Planning Authorities (DoEHLG, 2009). This report follows the staged approach outlined in the Guidelines and includes: • an overview of the applicable planning and flood -risk framework (Section 2), • a description of the site and existing environmental setting (Section 3), • a Stage 1-3 flood risk appraisal, including pluvial flood modelling (Sections 4-6), • recommended mitigation measures (Section 7), • a justification test where applicable (Section 8), and • the conclusions and recommendations of the assessment (Section 9). As mentioned previously, the following assessment has been carried out in accordance with 'The Planning System and Flood Risk Management Guidelines for Planning Authorities' (DoEHLG, 2009). This document is referred to as the 'Guidelines' throughout the remainder of the report. These guidelines recommend a staged approach to flood risk assessment that covers both the likelihood of flooding and the potential consequences. The stages of appraisal and assessment are: • Stage 1 Flood Risk Identification —A preliminary screening exercise to determine whether any flooding or surface -water management issues may affect the development site. This includes review of national datasets, local authority flood maps, and historic flood records. • Stage 2 Initial flood risk assessment - A more detailed appraisal of flood sources identified in Stage 1. This may include indicative flood -zone mapping, review of existing hydraulic models, and an assessment of information gaps that require site -specific analysis. • Stage 3 Detailed flood risk assessment - • A quantitative assessment of flood risk, focusing on the mechanisms, frequency, and potential impacts of flooding on the site and the surrounding environment. Modelling is used where necessary to evaluate flood depths, extents, and potential mitigation or compensatory measures. Flood Zones classify land based on the annual probability of flooding from rivers or the sea. They are used to guide development away from areas at higher flood risk. 4 Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan • Flood Zone A — High Probability: Greater than 1% annual probability of river flooding, or greater than 0.5% annual probability of coastal flooding. • Flood Zone B — Moderate Probability: Between 0.1% and 1% annual probability of river flooding, or between 0.1% and 0.5% annual probability of coastal flooding. • Flood Zone C — Low Probability: Less than 0.1% annual probability of both river and coastal flooding. This zone represents all land outside Zones A and B. Flood zones relate solely to fluvial and coastal flooding. Other sources (pluvial, groundwater, drainage, etc.) must be assessed separately. The Guidelines classify land uses according to their sensitivity to flooding. This ensures that highly vulnerable developments are directed away from higher -risk areas. • Highly Vulnerable: hospitals, emergency services buildings, dwelling houses, strategic utility infrastructure. • Less Vulnerable: commercial, industrial, recreational uses, sports facilities, open space. • Water Compatible: marinas, docks, amenity open space requiring water adjacency. Given the nature of the proposed GAA development —open -space recreational use with ancillary facilities —it Is categorised as Less Vulnerable, making it generally appropriate in Flood Zones B and C. The proposed development comprises open space recreational use, which is classified as 'Less Vulnerable' under the Planning System and Flood Risk Management Guidelines (2009). Such uses are considered appropriate in areas subject to flood risk, as they can accommodate occasional flooding without significant risk to people or property. A Justification Test is required only where highly vulnerable or Inappropriate land uses are proposed within Flood Zones A or B, or where development would otherwise conflict with the sequential approach. Although the site is located in Flood Zone C with respect to river and coastal flooding, a simplified development -management Justification Test has been undertaken to: • confirm that the development will not increase flood risk elsewhere, and • demonstrate that residual risks from pluvial flooding can be adequately mitigated. Figure 2.1 Matrix of vulnerability versus flood zone to Illustrate appropriate development and that required to meet the Justification Test (Extract from The Planning System and Flood Risk Management Guidelines) Highly vulnerable Justification Justification Appropriate development Test Test (including essential infrastructure) Less vulnerable Justification Appropriate Appropriate development Test Water -compatible Appropriate Appropriate Appropriate development 5 Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan The development site is situated at Kinnagin, Castieblayney, Co. Monaghan, with access via the existing entrance on the R181. The site is bordered by agricultural lands to the east and west, residential properties to the south, and the public road to the north. Land use in the area is primarily low -density residential and agricultural, with no significant industrial or commercial activity in the immediate surroundings. The proposed development —training pitches and associated sports infrastructure —is compatible with the surrounding land -use context and does not introduce vulnerable receptors that would significantly alter the flood -risk profile. It is noted that existing and permitted sports pitches in comparable settings are subject to periodic flooding without adverse impact, demonstrating that such conditions are typical and acceptable for this type of development. Planning Pack Map: n•vi,il r.,.Fc Ill > tip ii lip is 1 JJ e / Gearr / as hlonogo� �� n.z_7ci .� aw c � ox" -Si S-: 1: K i n n a g i n ( / J l r, ,�/ //I �" c r, uaa _/ _— A.. _ ' ::a .w WTPVT SCJLE• 17Y]C GgvYi•.....s. 'Pe.e wav,. ,...�..� `• Given the agricultural / open space nature of the proposed activity, the project can be classified as a 'Less vulnerable' development. Thus, development within a 'Flood Zone B' or 'Flood Zone C' would be appropriate in this instance. Development within a 'Flood Zone A' would require further justification. With the publication of Ireland's second River Basin Management Plan (RBMP), the RBMP 2018-2021 defines the entirety of the island of Ireland as a single River Basin District (RBD). This single RBD has been broken down into 46 catchment management units. These units are mainly based on the hydrometric areas in use by the local authorities. Each of the 46 catchment management units have been further broken down into 583 sub -catchments. 6 Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan The application site is located within the Hydrometric Area 06 (Newry, Fane, Glyde and Dee), Catchment 06 (Newry, Fane, Glyde and Dee), Sub -Catchment (Fane_SC_010) and Sub -Basin (Annahale Stream_010). During the survey carried out by Traynor Environmental Ltd the Mojor Lough Stream was noted > 1 km to the west of the site. The nearest watercourses are 2 open drains located south and west of the site boundary. The Major Lough Stream flows in a north-westerly direction, approximately 1.07km north-west of the application site. The EPA's water framework directive (WFD) mapping identifies that the Major Lough Stream (36M08) is the closest waterbody to the proposed development. This waterbody is located c. 1.07km from the site boundary. There are no drainage series that link the applicant's site to the Major Lough Stream. Cr' Major Lough j Stream Site Location According to the Teagasc and EPA soils map, - Fine loamy over shale or slate bedrock are found within the majority of the site. In addition, a small portion of Cutover peat soils are found towards the periphery of the southern boundary of the site. The National Soils Hydrology map identifies that the soil drainage class for the majority of the site is 'Well drained', given that the majority of the site is comprised of 'Brown Earth: Well drained mineral soils'. In Ireland, the parent material underlying the majority of the country is comprised of quaternary sediments with the remainder composed of bedrock outcrop. These quaternary sediments have resulted from glacial movement, melting and deposition. The Teagasc and EPA subsoil maps identify that Sandstone and shale till (Lower Palaeozoic) underly the Fine loamy over shale or slate bedrock soils. 7 Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan From the Teagasc Subsoil Map Site Is classified as Sandstone and shale sands and gravels (Lower Palaeozoic) k Based on the GSI's 1:100k bedrock formation mapping, the entirety of the proposed development site is underlain by the Oghill Formation (OL) which comprises of: Massive sandstone & microconglomerate'. No bedrock outcrops or karst features are present within the boundaries of the site. GSI's Hydrostratigraphic Rock Unit Group Name mapping shows the Geological Unit name as Silurian Metasediments and Volcanics (SMV). From the GSI Bedrock Map Site is classified as SMV - Silurian Metasediments and \ Volcanics NH NI) ___ A PI— Poor Aquifer - Poor Aquifer - Poor Aquifer - Bedrock which is Generally Unproductive except for Local Zones underlies the entirety of the site. An aquifer is a body of rock that holds groundwater. This aquifer is only capable of supplying small supplies (e.g., domestic supplies, small group schemes). Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney. Co. Monaghan From the GSI Groundwater Aquifer Map Site Is classified as Poor Aquifer - Bedrock which is Generally Unproductive and Locally important gravel aquifer Groundwater Vulnerability is a term used to represent the intrinsic geological and hydrogeological characteristics that determine the ease with which groundwater may be contaminated by human activities. Groundwater vulnerability maps are based on the type and thicknesses of subsoils (sands, gravels, glacial tills (or boulder clays), peat, lake and alluvial silts and clays), and the presence of certain karst features. Groundwater is most at risk where the subsoils are absent or thin and, in areas of karstic limestone, where surface streams sink underground at swallow holes. The majority of the development site is classified as 'M - Moderate' vulnerability. Groundwater here has natural characteristics that make it moderately vulnerable to contamination by human activities. The groundwater the site area is within the Louth Groundwater Body (GWB) and is classified as being of 'Good' status. ys.nv j1 �pANF From the GSI Vulnerability Map Site is classified as Moderate ATS RF 9 f Flood Risk Assessment Kinnogin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan The site is primarily located within the IEGBNI_NB_G_019 (Louth) ground waterbody which is described as having poorly productive bedrock. From the EPA Map Site Shows the Ground Waterbodies Risk as Not at risk Given that the project site does not impinge upon any geological heritage site, there are no Organic / peaty soils / subsoils found underlying the site or that any moderately to freely Draining soils are found within the site, the site would be classified as being of 'low' geological importance (see table 4). Consequently, as there will be no removal of Heritage features, loss of highly fertile ground or requirement for excavation of contaminated Soil / historic landfill area, the magnitude of impact would be classified as 'negligible'. From a hydrogeological perspective, the site itself would also be classified as being of 'low' Importance. For instance, a poorly productive aquifer underlies the site. Furthermore, the site Does not overlap the zone of contribution (zoc) for any public or privately sourced Groundwater supply. 10 Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan PFRA and CFRAM datasets indicate no risk of fluvial flooding from any nearby rivers or streams. The closest watercourse, the Major Lough Stream, lies more than 1 km west of the site and has no hydrological connection to the development area. Yc Cestlebieyney Site Location PFRA mapping identifies portions of the site as potentially susceptible to pluvial (surface -water) flooding. As PFRA outputs are coarse and not intended for property -level assessment, further detailed analysis is required GSI groundwater flood -probability mapping does not indicate any groundwater flooding risk at or near the site. The site is located over a poorly productive aquifer and is not within any karst landscape. OPW historic flood event records show no recorded instances of flooding within or near the site boundary. Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghon Past Flood Event Local Area Summary Report oPW Report Produced: 13/11/2025 9:3O This Past Flood Evcnt Summary Report surnmariscs all past flood events within 2.5 kilometres of the map centre. This report has been downloaded from www.floo dinfo.ie (the "Website'). The users should take account of the restrictions and limitations relating to the content and use of the Website that are explained in the Terms and Conditions. It is a condition of use of the Website that you agree to be bound by the disclaimer and other terms and conditions set cut on the Website and to the privacy policy on the Website. Map Legend 3e 3Tee AS�r_]e-ic_,t.crt Rccui.e' Fined Event Pest Flood Evert E.tcrts 1 7!rrrrl r.r jxr.�t 13362 =t5 Bnr:•It _d Lands CastlPblaynr y ❑Lard(_cmrniss;unBCre`itedLands ' Unm A ten :i Ucn mite anccnmc,s Scenttns Lands- . in-pxrant These 'caps do not md:cate flood hazard or flood e%.tent. That purp;sc and scopes explained -,n F toed. nfo is 5l 11e129 0 Results Name (Flood_ID) Nst,orrdl Mac. r... D,' n.un u' Taidc E roan.+ Start Date Event Location In Summary the OPW Flood Mapping indicates that: • OPW flood maps indicate that no flooding events occurred on the proposed site. Flooding is not anticipated to occur onsite and therefore no further assessment in terms risk from either is required. However, certain datasets identify the potential for coastal and pluvial flooding. It is therefore concluded that the assessment should proceed to Stage 2 Scoping Stage and concentrate on the potential of the site being Subject to pluvial flooding. 12 Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan i(\(( 2 AS:: ;N+FNi (s (;rIPMc ,iiv.(:E) - i[`!filAl Pl <>t)1 Ill A', LSSMH H lu',�i+ri I lorxlincr The PFRA pluvial flood extents represent broad -scale national mapping and are not intended for site -specific or property - level assessment. While these datasets indicate potential areas of ponding, this reflects generalised topographic variability across the site rather than a defined storage feature. Accordingly, a site -specific assessment has been undertaken to more accurately characterise surface water behaviour under existing greenfield conditions. Given this limitation, it was determined that the assessment should progress to Stage 3, incorporating a site -specific hydraulic model based on topographic survey data and design rainfall inputs. This approach enables quantification of pluvial flood depths, extents, and volumes, ensuring the development layout incorporates appropriate mitigation measures. Monaghan County Council pluvial flood mapping indicates that the site is subject to surface water flooding during extreme rainfall events. This mapping has been used as the basis for identifying flood -prone areas within the site. The Stage 3 assessment constitutes a quantitative evaluation of flood risk and includes field investigation, review of soil infiltration characteristics, and pluvial flood modelling to assess surface water behaviour across the site under existing greenfield conditions. A site walkover was undertaken in September 2025. Observations included: • Localised low-lying areas consistent with natural undulating ground levels typical of agricultural land. • Well -drained soils across most of the site, with minor areas of shallower gradients • No visible groundwater seepage, springs, or waterlogging • Existing open drains to the south and west, with no hydraulic connection to Major Lough Stream Roughness coefficients used for modelling were informed by local land cover and aligned with CFRAM regional values. 647 m i I ! 420 m 369 m 319 m 2;3m 1228 m 187 m 148 m 112 m 80rr ,2m 28 m 9 rn 13 Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney. Co. Monaghan The topographic map colour graduation provides a clear spatial representation of elevation change, facilitating the identification of slope gradients, drainage pathways, and potential areas of cut or fill. The moderate variation in levels suggests generally undulating terrain, which has been taken into account during site design, Rainfall information was derived for the site from the Met Eireann Rainfall Return data. As a matter of best practice, the impact of climate change has been considered, with a 20% increase on the 1 in 1 00 -year rainfall return period incorporated into the design calculation. • Critical Storm Duration = 6 hours • Rainfall depth = 67.0mm • Plus 20% for climate change = 80.4mm _. , •-_� Fi,,: all rr.la: L,1 .1 J1:,Q - L 1. .6, 14 ...4......., .C, .. .. ... .. .. _, .1, 5.: .9, 32.4, N/A Pluvial flooding arises from rainfall -generated overland flow and is a natural characteristic of greenfield sites. Monaghan County Council pluvial flood mapping indicates that the development area is subject to surface water flooding during periods of intense rainfall. The site currently experiences such flooding under existing conditions, and this will continue to occur following development. The proposed development does not seek to prevent or alter this natural behaviour. Instead, it is designed on the basis that the site will continue to flood in a manner consistent with the mapped and existing conditions. The development will maintain existing ground levels and will not alter natural overland flow paths or drainage patterns. As such, surface water behaviour across the site will remain unchanged. Temporary ponding of water across the playing surface during extreme rainfall events is therefore anticipated and is considered acceptable given the nature of the development as open space recreational use. 14 Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Costleblayney, Co. Monaghan � t• fr } S. Figure 6.6 above show that the pluvial flood level of the site. The development area is at risk of pluvial flooding. 15 Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan No engineered flood compensation or attenuation measures are proposed as part of the development. The design approach ensures that existing ground levels and natural drainage characteristics of the site are maintained. Surface water runoff will continue to behave in accordance with the existing greenfield condition, with no increase in runoff rates or volumes. The development does not involve raising ground levels, infilling, or altering flow paths, and therefore will not result in any displacement of flood waters or increase flood risk to adjoining lands or downstream receptors. Residual risk is limited to temporary surface water ponding during extreme rainfall events. This is considered low and is managed through the nature of the proposed use, as the playing surface will not be in use during such conditions. Access and egress routes remain unaffected at all times. No mitigation measures are required, as the development does not alter existing ground levels, drainage patterns, or flood behaviour, and therefore does not give rise to any additional flood risk. As no fluvial or coastal 'Flood Zone A' areas occur within the development site, the project can be deemed appropriate. Notwithstanding this, a Development Management Justification Test was carried out in respect of the proposed development in accordance with Section 5.15 of the Flood Risk Management Guidelines. Table 8.1 presents the results of this test which conclude that the proposed development satisfies the criteria of the Justification test. 16 Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan Criterion Response 5.1.1. The subject lands have been zoned or The subject lands are currently zoned as Not zoned. otherwise designated for the particular use or form of development in an operative development plan, which has been adopted or varied taking account of these Guidelines 5.1.2 (i) The development proposed will not The Flood Risk Assessment shows that the proposed increase flood risk elsewhere and, if development activity will be positioned outside of a fluvial practicable, will reduce overall flood risk, and coastal Flood Zone A'. Consequently, the proposed development will not displace flood water to adjoining lands and thus will not increase flood risk in the vicinity of the site or wider environment during the 1 in 100 -year event. The development maintains existing ground levels and surface water behaviour as identified by Monaghan County Council pluvial flood mapping and therefore will not increase flood risk elsewhere. 5.1.2 (ii) The development proposal includes Site -specific assessment, informed by available mapping and measures to minimise flood risk to people, property, site conditions, confirms that the development maintains the economy and the environment as far as existing greenfield runoff characteristics and does not alter reasonably possible. surface water behaviour. No engineered flood compensation measures are proposed, as the development maintains existing greenfield runoff characteristics and does not alter surface water flow paths or drainage behaviour across the site. 5.1.2 (iii) The development proposed includes The proposed development does not impact on any existing measures to ensure that residual risks to the area flood protection measures and will not prevent any potential and/or development can be managed to an future flood risk management measures being installed, given acceptable level as regards the adequacy of the setback distances between the site, and the nearby existing flood protection watercourses. No fluvial or coastal flooding under the 1.0% measures or the design, implementation and AEP scenario was modelled to occur at the site entrance as funding of any future flood risk management part of the CFRAM study. Site access and egress routes are measures and provisions for emergency services located outside of areas subject to pluvial flooding and will access. remain operational during all flood events, including the 1 in 100 -year event (plus climate change allowance). Therefore, safe access for users and emergency services will be maintained at all times. No buildings are proposed onsite, thus no Finished Floor Levels (F.F.Ls) accounting for climate change allowances need to be specified. 5.1.2 (iv) The development proposed addresses the The subject lands are currently not zoned, above in a manner that is also compatible with the achievement of wider planning objectives in relation to development of good urban design and vibrant and active streetscapes. 17 Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan Based on the detailed assessment undertaken, the following conclusions are made: I. Fluvial and coastal flooding do not pose a risk to the development site under any assessed scenario. 2. PFRA datasets indicate potential pluvial flood susceptibility; however, this reflects existing greenfield conditions and natural surface water behaviour across the site. 3. Site -specific assessment confirms that pluvial flooding reflects existing greenfield conditions and natural surface water behaviour across the site. 4. Site -specific assessment confirms that the proposed development will maintain existing ground levels and drainage characteristics, ensuring that surface water runoff behaviour remains unchanged from the current scenario. As no alteration to topography, flow paths, or runoff rates is proposed, the development will not increase flood risk elsewhere. 5. The development comprises open space recreational use and is classified as 'Less Vulnerable' in accordance with the Planning System and Flood Risk Management Guidelines (2009). Such uses are considered appropriate in areas subject to flood risk, as they can accommodate occasional flooding without adverse consequences. 6. Temporary ponding of water across the playing surface during extreme rainfall events will occur, consistent with existing conditions, playing surface during extreme rainfall events does not present a safety risk, as the area will not be in use during such conditions and no buildings or enclosed structures are affected. Site access and egress routes remain outside of flood -affected areas and will remain operational at all times. 7. No engineered flood compensation or attenuation measures are required, as the proposed development maintains existing greenfield runoff characteristics and does not alter surface water behaviour. 8. This approach is consistent with similar recreational developments, where periodic inundation of playing surfaces is accepted as part of normal operation. 9. The proposed development is not considered to be at risk of flooding in planning terms, as any flooding is shallow, predictable, non -hazardous, and consistent with the existing use of the site. 10. Monaghan County Council pluvial flood mapping indicates that the site is subject to flooding under extreme rainfall events, and this condition will remain unchanged following development. 11. The site currently floods under existing conditions and will continue to flood following development. This is an inherent characteristic of the site and is considered acceptable given the nature of the proposed use as open space recreational development. The proposed development does not seek to prevent flooding but is designed to accommodate it in a safe and controlled manner consistent with existing conditions. As such, no mitigation measures are required, and the development will not increase flood risk elsewhere. Signed: Nevin Traynor BSc. Env, H. Dip I.T, Cert SHWW. For Traynor Environmental Ltd 18 p U � Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT COMPLETED BY TRAYNOR ENVIRONMENTAL LTD - MONAGHAN COUNTY COUNCIL FLOOD ZONES MAP Ray or EnvironnlentQl Ltd. 21 uy tl 111 � y s�Wr y4 fir. � ".a `+� � `�► F, 'ii C 0 t 0) a 0 a U T n) N 6 <0 C 00 cc O c LL Y Flood Risk Assessment Kinnagin, Castleblayney, Co. Monaghan 20.00 in (5088 mm) 1 12.00 in (305 mm) 21.50 in (546 mm) 26.00 in (660 mm) Luminaire Data Weight (luminaire) 40 lb (18 kg) UL listing number E338094 UL listed for USA/Canada UL1598 CSA-C22.2 No.250.0 CE Declaration LVD, EMC, RoHS Ingress protection (luminaire) IP65 Impact rating IK07 Material and finish Aluminum, powder -coat painted Wind speed rating (aiming only) 150 mi/h (67 m/s) UL, IEC ambient temperature 50°C (122°F) (pending) rating (luminaire) Photometric Characteristics Projected lumen maintenance per IESTM-21-11 L90 (20k) >120,000 h L80 (20k) >120,000 h L70 (20k) > 120,000 h Lumens104,000 Cl[ correlated color temperature 5700 K Color rendering index (CRI) 75 typ, 70 min LED binning tolerance 5 -step MacAdam Ellipse Footnotes: 1) Incorporates appropriate dirt depreciation factor for life of luminaire. PLANNNG SECTION 23 APR 2026 1/926/34 (`1II rX11I U.S. and foreign patent(s) issued and pending • ' 2018, ; 23il�lt�s>joSpoftt ic�hting, LLC • TLC -LED -900 5700 K 75 CR(Ty1 • M-2628-en04-8_2023 I.I_1t.IJscD 1 Driver Data Electrical Data Rated wattage' Per driver Per luminaire Number of luminaires per driver Starting (inrush) current Fuse rating UL, IEC ambient temperature rating (e►ectrical components enclosure) Ingress protection (electrical components enclosure) Efficiency Dimming mode Range, energy consumption Range, light output Flicker Total harmonic distortion (THD) at full output 880 W 880 W 1 <40 A, 256 µs 15A 50°C (122°F) (pending) IP54 95% optional 21 - 100% 26-100% <2% <20% Typical Wiring Surge protection Controller (ifpresent) - fl �` Fuse Driver + �� Luminaire L2* Fuse * If L2 is neutral then not switched or fused. t Not present if indoor installation. Max operating current 5.43 A 5.22 A 4.93 A 4.72 A 4.52 A 3.92 A 3.13 A 2.86 A 2.72 A 2.62 A 2.26 A per luminaire' Footnotes: 1) Rated wattage is the power consumption, including driver efficiency losses, at stabilized operation in 25'C ambient temperature environment. 2) Operating current includes allowance for 0.90 minimum power factor, operating temperature, and LED light source manufacturing tolerances. Notes 1. Use thermal magnetic HID -rated or D -curve circuit breakers. 2. See Musco Control System Summary for circuit information. U.S. and foreign patent(s) issued and pending • O2018, 2023 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC • TLC -LED -900 5700075 CRITyp • M-2628-en04-8_2023 musco 2 mn Proposed Floodlighting at Blackhill GFC Kinnagin Castleblaney Co. Monaghan 25/20 Response to Further Information Request Compiled by Neil McSherry BEng MIET Proposed Floodlighting at Blackhill GFC As instructed, Musco Lighting Europe has undertaken the sports lighting design for the proposed playing pitch. Our design is prepared in compliance with: • Chartered Institute of Building Services Engineers Lighting Guide 4: Sports Lighting (CIBSE LG4) • BS EN 12193:2018 Light and lighting - Sports lighting • Institute of Lighting Professionals (ILP) ON 01/21 - Guidance Notes for the Reduction of Obtrusive Light Terminology For clarity some typical floodlighting terms have been defined/explained to assist in the comprehension of this report and the design documents: • Horizontal Illuminance (Eh) - the level of light at a given point measured on a horizontal plane, such as the sports pitch, roadway, or a path. Used in sports applications as an evaluation of light from a visual and playability standpoint. Measured by holding a light meter horizontal to the ground, facing toward the sky. • Vertical Illuminance (Ev) - the level of light at a given point measured on a vertical plane, such as a wall, the side of a building, or window. Measured by holding a light meter vertically towards the light source. • Lux - unit of measure for illumination. o Sunny Day = 50,000 - 150,000 lux o Overcast Day = 5,000 - 10,000 lux o Major sports stadium = 2,000 - 3,000 lux o Office lighting = 300 - 500 lux o Roadway lighting = 15- 30 lux o Sunset = 10 lux • Luminaire - Light fitting/floodlight • Uniformity (EminlEav) - Evaluation of how evenly light is distributed across a given area. Expressed as a ratio of the minimum point divided by the average of all points. • Metal Halide (HID) - Traditional lamp technology used in sports lighting. Combines specific gases and electricity to produce light. • LED - (Light Emitting Diode) - Light is produced electronically using a semiconductor The objective of the design was to produce a system compliant with CIBSE LG4 as follows: Training Pitch: 100m x 60m — 250 lux horizontal average, 0.6 Emin/Eay. In addition, the impact of the residential amenity of properties has been considered. In accordance with the BS EN 12193:2018 the local area can be classified as a residential suburban environment and therefore Environmental Zone 'E3' applies. E3 areas are defined for lighting purposes as Medium District Brightness Areas' (Table 2) and typically include suburban areas. In accordance with Table 2, Light Intrusion into Windows is limited to 10 lux vertical (Ev). The lighting design is compliant with this requirement with a maximum Light Intrusion into Windows of 9 lux vertical (E) as demonstrated at a height of 1.5m above ground level on page 3 of lighting design document 2425306. Blockage from tress and foliage is not modelled into the design. See below for reference: 5.32 5.30 In addition, horizontal and vertical light spill blankets including coloured contour lines are shown on pages 5 & 6. Contours are shown at 10, 5 and 2 lux. The developed design is optimised for compliance with !LP Guidance Notes for the Reduction of Obtrusive Light GN 01/21 by minimising obtrusive light; Spill, sky glow and glare. This is achieved in the following ways: Column height, number of columns and aiming angles Choosing appropriate number of columns and column heights is key to the overall quality of the lighting design. Based on the size of the pitch, the sport being played, the competition level, and the application of the floodlighting system (televised or non - televised); column numbers and height requirements must be accurately assessed to ensure the aiming angle of the floodlight onto the pitch is at an appropriate degree to maintain good playability, control glare, and reduce spill light on adjoining properties and roadway. See the diagram below: Higher Mounting Height Lower Mounting Height To achieve the lighting standard required 6 no. 12m columns are proposed. These column heights achieve optimal aiming angles; minimising glare and spill light while facilitating even light distribution as set out by CIBSE LG4. 2. Class Leading Light Control The proposal uses Musco's Light Structure Green TLC for LEDTM - Total Light Control system. The Musco LED system luminaire is available in a multitude of beam patterns, wattages and cut off visors or cowls ensuring class leading light control and minimal light spill and glare. Typical cut off visor illustrated below In accordance with GN01/21 — ILP The Reduction of Obtrusive Light lighting the system proposed is designed 'so that the front glazing is kept at or near horizontal; parallel to the surface to be lit or ground'. Furthermore 'only luminaires with upward light ratio of 0% and good optical control' and 'always be mounted on the horizontal, i.e., no upward tilt.' are proposed. The proposal adopts best practice as set out in GN01/21 for limiting Sky Glow with a Upward Light Ratio of 0% and no light emitted above the horizontal 'in a zone between 90° and 110°'. Musco are leaders in the development of LED technology for sports lighting applications. Some high -profile installations include: • Aviva Stadium • Kingspan Stadium Belfast • Wexford Park • Pearse Stadium • Connacht Rugby The following images of completed projects illustrate the enhanced spill control of the TLC for LEDTM system over typical LED sports lights available in the market. 5 Lu I- C,) F- w J i 0 U J I- 0 0 U) S W 2 I- LL 0 U) LI S N 0 Q 0 O ►w V z C, C) C.) 0 coco 3. Patented Technological Advancements The Musco LED system is designed to perform for more than ten times as long as traditional metal halide system (L90 >120,000 hours). This means less maintenance required, thus less disturbance on the surrounding area. Musco offers a fully inclusive 10 - year warranty with the entire system, so it will never fall into disrepair. The environmental impact relating to energy consumption and CO2 emissions is significantly reduced with the proposed LED system. Analysis of both technologies shows the LED system will reduce energy consumption and OO2 emissions by around 66% over 2kW metal halide systems. Attachments 1. 242530C Lighting Design 2. TLC -LED -900 Data Sheets 1 W •G • ID N) N N Cn W O C) T ID 0 N Ui NI r' o w p:� 11 t/1 z N XX Oo rho III m 3.�3.vv 3 J< J J J H J DID in 0(D � 3 O( n n � n n r) 11 m a� TO T d 0 O 0 VT O � � c C) 0 d Co 3 G w 3 010 00 0* v 0 TO o O 0 N be O O N O V be O A W O D c O 0 0 m O v� fJ (S N N N N N LA 3 s d 3 0• ffQ 9f f, 00 c lJ N A � 3 9 J m l0 o ID A d a A T 0 3 S 0 3 ID O 0 v 0 --n 7)0 7)0 7 O 3 rn m 2 m m tA I-. V -< Ui O O NJ N •P W N w 03 s UNi V 3 0 0 O (n 32.2m. W N — N (A) 32.2m (n co — N O) co W O) A L � 3I - W N — N (A) -P Cn C) � N) 6) Cn O 4 O)(31 N W N -� N N N (3) C) — C7 C) O0 CD P N N -I CO (O N N) N Wi C) C - C) W C) _ W W N — -� WO o= o W ( CJ) 0o U) om 3� 3 W W N) 0o N W 0)4 32.20.) v CC 4 N C3) O0 C) —J N C) —CSI 32_2m (1)(1)k—er N — N W co C)C) N) co - O) O) N) N) — N N N OO O0 — C) Cn 4 -4 N) N N N N) W N) C)) (fl CS) — C) O) O C) ' C) co CA Fw,4 AI W N — - W N1 � 00._ C) Y N W C3I O0 CO 3�E 2.2n� W N N) W 32.2m n O H N CD N 0 CD a pq C N o + 3 o. 000 c Q _ r-1 n 0 0 N n, O 3 F<o �.v°' vi3nf°i aim z c c 3 OQ O N" N n O pa z A N d p2, m G) > wroc�3 E,�3 noa °0 zz v m n m m 3 sm cv ao v v 3•n3a m 3 33 << 30# Dflacm °w `da as<< ww c o i A N o. 1 S N �+ D V O N 0 O O F+ A N N T S (DCN O N CD lr 00 V tD 00 W .....Al w 00 O1 O' D 00 C ri ti, d w, F W to A !n O O O ' n A Al CD O <2 0 2OCD $2 O N 03 l-< O3 .� o CD v 0> + 03 O C O CCD3z w 3 a o a n � in 0 n o- ., ro S.. 3 m m ^ n 0 CD 0 0 0 i < n 0 3 tai m z m 1 rn LA N O -n (D N) N N Ul 0 O 03 C-) • I -- N CD IS In NJ 3 O1 W O rri In U -� • m I-. p z p m _ I m 3 m mc, on _ N d N D O" 2 ro 3 � n m z A , o 3 V I / \ (vn, W 1 is I p o ; m f S oo�m 3. N fD .nr n 3 d C 1 C -� j w - �< 2 inr I'fl w r0°Dc jai i.nm am a. — T z n� m 3 sa .. m m d 3.n3 0 3 3v D aN m Dn N � o -• c ={ 3 v D c d o �vO° am v 2 c xw 3 3 m O C O m ID n" ' - C 0<41- f+ f+ D to O O O O A tp m m �' y� O .. N D! � In 00 o o A m N O Da (0 E n -4, Di -' r DD 0 o In to m Z-' _; J A 0F3 3 C A m o�m ..2D 4,aoo 1 v N O lD a aID 03 o 01 OD N CD m v y•a w n CD Q ao' m r3D , 1-+ OD ~O 00 N m Yl Dr x 3 N w r'i o x a m (03 00 0 0° o al a 3 0 a 3� 0 •Z m 3 :T< m 2 CD O 3 x Co S o m m A .2 < m Co I D � m o 00 W 0 32.2w N e T 4t N -- th N (D O Ul o O T w 32.2m W lh _ C 3 0 m m m m ooh o�m 3o�mo Q D N O • It (P3 C ID C W n �N d3 C C d n 3m 3 m �3 � < 22 Q • Z C 0 Z w 2J' aa: m 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o0 0 0 0 0 0 0//1/j 0 0 0 0 0 0 O000000...ww.0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '/ 32.2m N J V N3z 2m �U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N $ Al o 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o wfi °i m v o o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 g 3w - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E/" o e w m m & � 0 0 o c 0' "'� '3��' -� 8' m w w m .� N o 0 0 (n >U) 0 0 0 0 - w w o Ut 3�2.2m m m w 032.2m N w 0 0 0 0 o o1 0 o N m 32.2m m N ='832.210,1 � W o 0 0 0 0 0 aoat 0 0 0 y�wm�`d1ii�� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 w. > m mN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dl ::'j o 0 0 o a o o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a� o o m o o dl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o I #p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o 0 0 0 o a o a o 0 0 o O 0 0 o a o pm 5-r emu; G1 o 0 CD CD 0 a 0� � n°� y O N J F <20C w c o 3 —CD —n sID Q om'.". rno w C• � V 7 n� A n N maa p o T rD Q,-, o 0 7 N N D C O< rt N d Ort u N O N ? < oj3 .�O • + m D 0 , O wCD 3 C m 3 z no_� �n Co D ] D C 3 Do CD'. 011 3 w ns ID < a - v ° o CD Z F o D m v z Z v n n m o °1• c �• v 3 D c 'w D I o o 0 0 CO W 0 In DDCO P' O o 00 a A n o o r - a N W N LG1 CD D 0 0 0) 00 r � S em C a -p K D1 CD Q. � N C) T 0) QQ 3 N m z m m 0 O O ' G oo__ w0000/0000 0 pow :111 ii:'::: a�N,�m �aN�oo a,,,,w::N::N� ::Nwo 1 32.2m �32.2m �J a'3` w N w 0 0 rn^'F0 - - 0 0 0,, 0 0 0 o N TIIp ? ~�,►3e' N w 0 a 0 3 fi. 0 0 m • r 1 3 a �, w N 0 ... _, 0 I Pt N w0 0 a m m 0 0 r. W k0_0 m 0w m� A 0 w m 0 t w 32..2m m 3 32.2m 3 N HIV _ A 0 10a 0 0 w ti � w- .>Iacna N w N 32.2m3 9 3 832.2m!; I0J?L 0 w � - W : : o w- w v m m e : N o q' a w N w o o — �� � � N w o �-�w m � � v o71 w w w .. � .. .. 0 0 ,/ , , N N : ca > : w N w „ : > > , , _ � 0 0 w 0 o „ w w w w w 0 ti :' X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , - , , _ , , , , - , , ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.w (D3 Q n 3 a CC a v v 0_a w n nn 0 3 N n1 3 0—' Q3`° aN -� >(O0 3D2 CO N O 0 mss Ol 0. d°° S 04 N C () 00 ID 3 ,. QZ o D • N w 3- E0 N° a3 C. CO C N O• 30 N CD N w ° 3 m n�i Q •2ID C z 70 C O D m O o v Z Z 2 v 2 3.n30— m 33 � D o °1• n a 3 D c c o. z cxw 3 3 m N r D -JO w 0 0 0 0 w 010 00 toO p b 0O0 100100 01 'm 9 0 = v z ° N 01 S m N 0 O o E 3 v 3 3 ID be O X 030 O 0• ID 3 � 3. n DO � DC CD v� T 3 s (D 41 3 ^ N G1 0) OQ n O a ) &�� _moi((� $ }(�� \ 2 %«(&�- : . }\�[}\ }� ' 2 = = &y§ / '53 - k \ § - \�§ R J § V) o @ `o . n ~ w 0'3 3} - §§ K \ ® \