HomeMy WebLinkAbout2560469 - F.I. Received Doc. - Natura Impact StatementGreenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement i | P a g e
Natura Impact Statement
Proposed 850kW Turbine
Dundrumman, Scotstown, Co. Monaghan
Compiled by: Sara Sheridan MSc BSc QCIEEM, Veon Ecology
Prepared for: Greenvolt Next Ireland
On behalf of: Connolly Meats Ltd.
Completfon Date: 18th of May 2026 RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement ii | P a g e
Table of Contents
Sectfon 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Legislatfve Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Methodology & Report Structure ........................................................................................................................... 2
1.2.1 Appropriate Assessment Methodology ........................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Guidance and Legislatfon ........................................................................................................................................ 4
1.4 Planning Process ..................................................................................................................................................... 5
Sectfon 2: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................................................................. 6
2.1 Project Locatfon ...................................................................................................................................................... 6
2.2 Project Descriptfon ................................................................................................................................................. 9
2.3 Potentfally Affected Natura 2000 Sites ................................................................................................................... 9
2.4 Potentfally Affected Habitats/Species ................................................................................................................... 10
Sectfon 3: EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................................... 12
3.1 Baseline Ecology ................................................................................................................................................... 12
3.2 Desktop Study and Informatfon Sources .............................................................................................................. 12
3.3 Field Study ............................................................................................................................................................ 13
3.3.1 Habitat Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 13
3.3.2 Avifauna ......................................................................................................................................................... 16
3.3.3 Mammals ....................................................................................................................................................... 17
3.4 Hydrology & Water Quality ................................................................................................................................... 17
3.5 Geology & Soils ..................................................................................................................................................... 18
Sectfon 4: STAGE 1. SCREENING FOR APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................. 20
4.1 Overview of Potentfal Impacts .............................................................................................................................. 20
4.2 Determining the Likely Zone of Influence ............................................................................................................. 20
4.3 Identfficatfon of Relevant Natura 2000 Sites ........................................................................................................ 21
4.4 Stage 1: Screening of Relevant Natura 2000 Sites ................................................................................................ 22
4.4.1 Special Protectfon Areas (SPAs) ..................................................................................................................... 22
4.4.2 Special Areas of Conservatfon (SACs) ............................................................................................................ 22
4.6 Screening Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 23
Sectfon 5: STAGE 2. SCREENED IN NATURA 2000 SITES .................................................................................................. 23
5.1 Conservatfon Objectfves ....................................................................................................................................... 23
5.2 Natura 2000 Site Descriptfons .............................................................................................................................. 24
5.3 Supportfng Habitats and Species .......................................................................................................................... 25
5.4 Threats and Pressures ........................................................................................................................................... 26
5.5 Potentfal Impacts from the Proposed Development ............................................................................................ 26
5.5.1 Habitat loss, disturbance and fragmentatfon ................................................................................................ 27
5.5.2 Non-natfve and invasive species .................................................................................................................... 27
5.5.3 Avifauna ......................................................................................................................................................... 28 RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement iii | P a g e
5.6 Potentfal Adverse Effects & Proposed Mitfgatfon ................................................................................................. 28
5.7 Summary of Potentfal Impacts .............................................................................................................................. 29
Sectfon 6: PROTECTIVE MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................................................................ 30
6.1 Design Phase Mitfgatfon ....................................................................................................................................... 30
6.2 Constructfon Phase Mitfgatfon ............................................................................................................................. 30
6.2.1 Inspectfon ...................................................................................................................................................... 30
6.2.2 Control of Noise ............................................................................................................................................. 30
6.2.3 Flora and Fauna .............................................................................................................................................. 30
6.3 Operatfon Phase Mitfgatfon .................................................................................................................................. 31
6.4 Decommissioning Phase Mitfgatfon ...................................................................................................................... 31
Sectfon 7: RESIDUAL EFFECT ........................................................................................................................................... 32
Sectfon 8: IN-COMBINATION EFFECT .............................................................................................................................. 33
8.1 County Development Plan .................................................................................................................................... 33
8.2 Planning Applicatfons ............................................................................................................................................ 34
8.3 Summary of Cumulatfve Impact Assessment ....................................................................................................... 35
Sectfon 9: NIS CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 37
Sectfon 10: DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................................... 38
Sectfon 11: REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................. 39
Sectfon 12: APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................................. 42
Appendix 1. MAPS & FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... 42
Appendix 2. ECOLOGICAL SURVEYS & INVESTIGATIONS ............................................................................................. 46
Appendix 3. PHOTOGRAPHS ....................................................................................................................................... 57
Appendix 4. CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................... 63
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement iv | P a g e
Executfve Summary
Veon Limited (Veon Ecology) has been appointed by Greenvolt Next Ireland, on behalf of Connolly Meats Limited, to
carry out a Screening for Appropriate Assessment (AA) and Natura Impact Statement (NIS) for the proposed erectfon
of a 850kW turbine and associated works on lands at Dundrumman, Scotstown, Co. Monaghan.
The Screening for Appropriate Assessment and Natura Impact Statement (NIS) has been prepared to provide the
competent authority, Monaghan County Council, with the relevant scientffic informatfon to conduct the Appropriate
Assessment (AA) in accordance with the requirement of Artfcle 6(3) of the Habitats Directfve (Directfve 92/43) and in
accordance with the provisions of sectfon 177T of the Planning & Development Act 2000 (as amended).
The area subject to the planning applicatfon is approximately 1.6 acres and lies within a field approximately 4.9 acres
which is under the control of applicant. The project site consists of improved agricultural grassland, grazed by cattle.
The surrounding area is predominantly improved agricultural land, with several residentfal dwellings and agricultural
buildings scattered across the landscape and some areas dominated by scrub. The project site is owned and managed
by Connolly Meats Ltd., a local meat wholesale business. The company has various facilitfes and buildings on adjacent
lands including packaging facilitfes and agricultural sheds.
The Proposed Development consists of the erectfon of a single 850kW wind turbine and associated works. Th e
proposed turbine will have a maximum height of 91 meters, 65m hub height and 26m blade length, and will be located
on land currently classed as improved agricultural grassland (GA1). The turbine will be located centred at Latftude:
54°16'46.39"N, Longitude: 7°7'48.98"W.
Two Natura 2000 sites fall with the proposed site’s ZoI: Slieve Beagh SPA (004167) and Kilroosky Lough Cluster SAC
(001786)(see Figure 2.2). Neither protected site is physically nor hydrologically connected to the Proposed
Development site. The Slieve Beagh SPA lies in close proximity to the development site, only 1.9km north. The Kilroosky
Lough Cluster SAC is 10.9km southwest of the proposed site, with no hydrological connectfon. Due the close proximity
of the Slieve Beagh SPA to the development, it has been screening in for potentfal impacts as a result of the
development. The Slieve Beagh SPA’s Qualifying Interest (QI) for which it is designated is Hen Harrier (Circus cyaneus)
and covers upland areas of blanket bog, highly suitable breeding habitat for Hen Harrier.
The contents of this NIS, produced by Veon Ecology are true and have been prepared with due regard to the Chartered
Instftute of Ecology and Environmental Management’s (CIEEM) Code of Professional Conduct. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement v | P a g e
General Details
Details of Author(s)
Name: Sara Sheridan MSc BSc
Address: Office 17, Oran House, Oran Town Centre, Statfon Road, Oranmore, Co. Galway
Company name: Veon Ltd. Veon Ecology
Phone: M: +353 87 1127182
E-mail: ssheridan@veon.ie
Details of relevant
qualifications/
affiliations/years of
experience
MSc in Ecological Management & Conservatfon Biology from Queen’s University Belfast
BSc (Hons) in Environmental Science from University of Galway
MSc earned in 2022 from Queen’s University Belfast. Extensive experience in ornithology,
with practfcal experience as a member of a field ecology team conductfng various surveys.
Experience in the completfon of ecological reports including Natura Impact Statements
and Ecological Impact Assessment. Deep knowledge of environmental legislatfon and
ecological assessment.
Describe scope of
contribution in preparing
this NIS
Desktop survey, Phase 1 habitat survey, Ecological assessment, Final report compilatfon.
Veon Ltd. Veon Ecology
Revision Description Author: Date Reviewed By: Date Authorised by: Date
1 Drafl Report SS 31/08/23 DP 01/09/23 - -
2 Final Report SS 08/11/23 DP 09/11/23 - -
3
Request for
Further
Informatfon
JG 27/01/2026 DP 12/05/2026
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 1 | P a g e
Sectfon 1: INTRODUCTION
Veon Limited (Veon Ecology) has been appointed by Greenvolt Next Ireland, on behalf of Connolly Meats Limited, to
carry out a Screening for Appropriate Assessment (AA) and Natura Impact Statement (NIS) for the proposed erectfon
of a 850kW turbine and associated works on lands at Dundrumman, Scotstown, Co. Monaghan. The locatfon of the
proposed works is presented in Figure 2.1.
The Screening for Appropriate Assessment and Natura Impact Statement (NIS) has been prepared to provide t he
competent authority, Monaghan County Council, with the relevant scientffic informatfon to conduct the Appropriate
Assessment (AA) in accordance with the requirement of Artfcle 6(3) of the Habitats Directfve (Directfve 92/43) and in
accordance with the provisions of sectfon 177T of the Planning & Development Act 2000 (as amended). This
informatfon will allow Monaghan County Council to determine, in view of best scientffic knowledge, if the proposed
project, individually or in combinatfon with other plans and projects is likely to have a significant effect on a Natura
2000 Site and, where necessary, to ascertain whether or not the proposed project would adversely affect the integrity
of a Natura 2000 Site.
A Screening for Appropriate Assessment for the proposed project has been prepared and is provided in Section 4. The
screening assessment concluded as follows:
‘It cannot be excluded beyond reasonable scientific doubt, in view of best scientific knowledge on the basis of objective
information and in light of the conservation objectives of the relevant Natura 2000 Sites, that the proposed project (i.e.,
the erection of a wind turbine along with associated works), individually or in combination with other plans and
projects, would have a significant effect on the following Natura 2000 Sites:
Slieve Beagh SPA (004167)
As a result, an Appropriate Assessment of the proposed project is required, and a Natura Impact Statement shall be
prepared in respect of the proposed project (i.e., erection of a wind turbine and associated works)’.
1.1 Legislatfve Background
The Council Directfve 92/43/EEC on the Conservatfon of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora, better known
as “The Habitats Directfve”, provides legal protectfon for habitats and species of European importance. Artfcles 3 to 9
provide the legislatfve means to protect habitats and species of Community interest through the establishment and
conservatfon of an EU-wide network of sites known as Natura 2000.
Natura 2000 sites are defined under the Habitats Directfve (Artfcle 3) as a coherent European ecological network of
special areas of conservatfon, composed of sites hostfng the natural habitat types listed in Annex I and habitats of the
species listed in Annex II, shall enable the natural habitat types and the species' habitats concerned to be maintained
or, where appropriate, restored at a favourable conservatfon status in their natural range. In Ireland, these sites are
designated as Natura 2000 Sites and include Special Protectfon Areas (SPAs), established under the EU Birds Directfve
(79/409/EEC, as codified by 2009/147/EC) for birds and Special Areas of Conservatfon (SACs), established under the
Habitats Directfve 92/43/EEC for habitats and species.
The Habitats Directfve has been transposed into Irish law by Part XAB of the Planning and Development Act, 2000 -
2015 and the European Communitfes (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulatfons 2011 (SI 477/2011) as amended.
Artfcles 6(3) and 6(4) of the Habitats Directfve set out the decision-making tests for plans and projects likely to adversely
affect the integrity of Natura 2000 Sites (Annex 1.1).
Article 6(3) establishes the requirement for Appropriate Assessment (AA):
Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the [Natura 2000] site but likely to
have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combinatfon with other plans or projects, shall be subjected
to appropriate assessment of its implicatfons for the site in view of the site’s conservatfon objectfves. In light of the RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 2 | P a g e
conclusions of the assessment of the implicatfons for the site and subject to the provisions of paragraph 4, the
competent natfonal authoritfes shall agree to the plan or project only afler having ascertained that it will not adversely
affect the integrity of the site concerned and, if appropriate, afler having obtained the opinion of the general public.
Artfcle 6(3) of the Habitats Directfve, transposed into Irish Law relevant to this project includes Part XAB of the Planning
and Development Act, 2000-2019 and the European Communitfes (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulatfons 2011 (as
amended).
Natura 2000 sites in Ireland (herein referred to as Natura 2000 Sites) that form part of the Natura 2000 network of
protected sites include Special Areas of Conservatfon (SACs) designated due to their significant ecological importance
for species and habitats protected under Annexes I and II respectfvely of the Habitats Di rectfve, and Special Protected
Areas (SPAs), designated for the protectfon of populatfons and habitats of bird species protected under the EU Birds
Directfve (Council Directfve 2009/409/EEC). Features for which SACs and SPAs are designated are termed Qualifying
Interests and Special Conservatfon Interests respectfvely. Collectfvely, Qualifying Inte rests and Special Conservatfon
Interests are herein referred to as Qualifying Features.
As the proposed project is not directly connected with or necessary to the management of any Natura 2000 Site,
Monaghan County Council as the competent authority, is obliged to assess, in view of best scientffic knowledge, if the
Proposed Development, individually or in combinatfon with other plans or projects, is likely to have a significant effect
on Natura 2000 Sites.
The appropriate assessment process undertaken to meet Artfcle 6(3) obligatfons is described in Section 1.2.1 below.
In consideratfon of the findings of the Screening report, a Natura Impact Statement (NIS) has been prepared in
accordance with the in compliance with the provisions of Sectfon 177T of the Planning & Development Act 2000 as
amended. In additfon, the NIS follows the European Commission guidance document ‘Assessment of Plans and Projects
Significantly affectfng Natura 2000 Sites: Methodological Guidance on the provisions of Artfcle 6(3) and 6(4) of the
Habitats Directfve 92/43/EEC’ (EC, 2001) and the Department of the Environment’s Guidance on the Appropriate
Assessment of Plans and Projects in Ireland (DoEHLG, 2010).
1.2 Methodology & Report Structure
The informatfon contained in this Natura Impact Statement (NIS) is formulated to comply with the provisions of
sectfons 177 T (1)(b) and 177 T (2) in that it comprises of a scientffic examinatfon of evidence and data, carried out by
competent person(s) to identffy and classify any implicatfons for the relevant Natura 2000 Sites in view of their
conservatfon objectfves, and to allow the Competent Authority to assess in accordance with the provisions of sectfon
177 V of the Planning & Development Act 2000 (as amended);
(i) Whether there will be any adverse effects on the integrity of any Natura 2000 Site, in the event the
proposed project proceeds.
(ii) Whether the proposed project, alone or in combinatfon with other plans and/or projects will adversely
affect the integrity of any Natura 2000 Sites in view of their conservatfon objectfves.
The proposed project is described in detail in Section 2 of this report. Following on from this the results of the desk
and field surveys that were undertaken are presented in Section 3, to provide the necessary details of the ecological
baseline conditfons of the site for the proposed project. The proposed operatfons of the project are considered in the
context of potentfal effects on the baseline environment, with partfcular reference to the potentfal for adverse effect
on the integrity of the relevant Natura 2000 Site(s).
The conservatfon objectfves and Qualifying Interests (QI)/Special conservatfon interests (SCI) of the “screened in”
Natura 2000 Sites are described in Section 5, with the identfficatfon of potentfal pathways for effects on each individual
(QI)/(SCI). Where potentfal pathways for effects are identffied, the potentfal for these adverse effects on each QI/SCI is
assessed with respect to the natfonal level pressures and threats. Where available, the site -specific attributes and RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 3 | P a g e
targets, associated with the individual QI/SCI are also assessed in relatfon to the proposed project taking into
consideratfon best practfce guidelines and following the precautfonary principle as detailed in Artfcle 191 of the Treaty
on the Functfoning of the European Union (TFEU). Following on from this assessment a further assessment of the
potentfal for effects when the proposed project is considered cumulatfvely and in combinatfon with other plans and/or
projects is detailed in Section 8 of this report.
Finally, a concluding statement is provided in Section 9 of the report. This includes a summary of the results of the
assessment along with a summary statement of the lack of adverse effects on the integrity of any Natura 2000 Site (in
light of the Conservatfon Objectfves of the site as per Box 10 of EC, 2001). As per EC (2001) the meaning of integrity is
defined as follows:
The integrity of a site involves its ecological functions. The decision as to whether it is adversely affected should focus
on and be limited to the site’s conservation objectives’ (MN2000, paragraph 4.6(3))’. The information contained in this
report will allow the Competent Authority to determine that the proposed project either individually or in combination
with other projects will not adversely affect the integrity of any Natura 2000 Site.
1.2.1 Appropriate Assessment Methodology
The purpose of an Appropriate Assessment (AA) is to establish whether a partfcular plan or project is likely to have a
significant effect on a Natura 2000 Site, either individually or in combinatfon with other plans and/or projects. Natura
2000 sites in Ireland are Natura 2000 Sites, including Special Protectfon Areas (SPAs), and Special Areas of Conservatfon
(SACs).
The four distfnct stages in the AA process are summarised diagrammatfcally in Figure 1.1. Stages 1-2 deal with the
main requirements for assessment under Artfcle 6(3). Stage 3 may be part of the Artfcle 6(3) Assessment or may be a
necessary precursor to Stage 4. Stage 4 is the main derogatfon step of Artfcle 6(4).
Figure 1.1: Stages of Appropriate Assessment.
Stage 1: Screening for Appropriate Assessment.
Screening is the process that addresses and records the reasoning and conclusions in relatfon to the first two tests of
Artfcle 6(3):
Whether a plan or project is directly connected to or necessary for the management of the site, and whether a plan
and/or project, alone or in combinatfon with other plans and/or projects, is likely to have significant effects on a Natura
2000 Site in view of its conservatfon objectfves.
If the effects are deemed to be significant, potentfally significant, or uncertain, or if the screening process becomes
overly complicated, then the process must proceed to Stage 2 (AA). Screening should be undertaken without the
inclusion of mitfgatfon, unless potentfal impacts clearly can be avoided through the modificatfon or redesign of the
plan or project, in which case the screening process is repeated on the altered plan. The greatest level of evidence and
justfficatfon will be needed in circumstances when the process ends at screening stage on grounds of no impact.
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 4 | P a g e
Stage 2: Appropriate Assessment (Natura Impact Statement).
The aim of Stage 2 of the AA process is to identffy any adverse impacts that the plan or project might have on the
integrity of relevant Natura 2000 Sites. As part of the assessment, a key consideratfon is ‘in combinatfon’ effects with
other plans or projects. Where adverse impacts are identffied, mitfgatfon measures can be proposed that would avoid,
reduce or remedy any such negatfve impacts and the plan or project should then be amended accordingly, thereby
avoiding the need to progress to Stage 3.
This stage considers whether the plan or project, alone or in combinatfon with other projects or plans, will have adverse
effects on the integrity of a Natura 2000 Site, and includes any mitfgatfon measures necessary to avoid, reduce or offset
negatfve effects. The proponent of the plan or project will be required to submit a Natura Impact Statement, i.e., the
report of a targeted professional scientffic examinatfon of the plan or project and the relevant Natura 2000 Sites, to
identffy and characterise any possible implicatfons for the site in view of the site’s conservatfon objectfves, taking
account of in-combinatfon effects. This should provide informatfon to enable the public authority to carry out the AA.
The informatfon required in a Natura Impact Statement, is outlined in Regulatfon 42(5) (a) of the European
Communitfes (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulatfons 2011 (S.I. No. 477/2011) as amended, as follows:
A Natura Impact Statement shall, in additfon to addressing the issues referred to in the interpretatfon contained in
Regulatfon 2(1), include such informatfon or data as the public authority considers necessary, and specifies in a notfce
given under paragraph (3), to enable it to ascertain if the plan or project will affect the integrity of the site.
Where appropriate, an Appropriate Assessment (AA) shall include, in addition:
(i) The alternatfve solutfons that have been considered and the reasons why they have not been adopted.
(ii) The imperatfve reasons of overriding public interest that are being relied upon to indicate that the plan or
project should proceed notwithstanding that it may adversely affect the integrity of a Natura 2000 Site.
(iii) The compensatory measures that are being proposed.
If the assessment is negatfve, i.e., adverse effects on the integrity of a site cannot be excluded, then the process must
proceed to Stage 3, or the plan or project should be abandoned. The competent authority must decide to that effect
before proceeding to the next stage.
1.3 Guidance and Legislatfon
The Screening for AA and This NIS report has been prepared with regard to the relevant provisions of the EU Council
Directfve 92/43/EEC and Ireland’s EU (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulatfons 2011 (as amended). The methodology
considered in preparatfon of this report and additfonal guidance and legislatfon followed for this assessment are
outlined below:
• DoEHLG (2009, rev. 2010) Appropriate Assessment of Plans and Projects in Ireland Guidance for Planning
Authoritfes. Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government.
• European Commission (EC) (2018), Managing Natura 2000 Sites: the provisions of Artfcle 6 of the ‘Habitats
Directfve’ 92/43/EEC, Office for Official Publicatfons of the European Communitfes, Luxembourg. European
Commission.
• EC (2002) Assessment of Plans and Projects Significantly Affectfng Natura 2000 Sites: Methodological guidance
on the provisions of Artfcle 6(3) and (4) of the Habitats Directfve 92/43/EEC, Office for Official Publicatfons of
the European Communitfes, Luxembourg. European Commission.
• EC (2021) Assessment of Plans and Projects in relatfon to Natura 2000 sites - Methodological guidance on
Artfcle 6(3) and (4) of the Habitats Directfve 92/43/EEC. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 5 | P a g e
• EC (2007a) Guidance document on Artfcle 6(4) of the 'Habitats Directfve' 92/43/EEC - Clarificatfon of the
concepts of: alternatfve solutfons, imperatfve reasons of overriding public interest, compensatory measures,
overall coherence, opinion of the commission. European Commission.
• EC, (2007b), Guidance document on the strict protectfon of animal species of Community interest under the
Habitats Directfve 92/43/EEC. European Commission.
• EC (2013) Interpretatfon Manual of European Union Habitats. Version EUR 28. European Commission.
• EC (2021) Assessment of Plans and Projects in relatfon to Natura 2000 sites - Methodological guidance on
Artfcle 6(3) and (4) of the Habitats Directfve 92/43/EEC.
• Chartered Instftute of Ecology and Environmental Management (CIEEM) Version 1.1 (September 2019),
Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland.
• NPWS (2019). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 2: Habitat Assessments.
Unpublished NPWS report.
• NPWS (2019). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments.
Unpublished NPWS report.
• Office of the Planning Regulator (OPR) (2021) Practfce Note PN01 - Appropriate Assessment Screening for
Development Management.
• The European Communitfes (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulatfons 2011 as amended.
• The Planning and Development Act 2000-2022.
• The Planning and Development Regulatfons 2001-2022.
1.4 Planning Process
Due to the nature of the proposed project, a Natura Impact Statement (NIS) report for the purpose of planning
applicatfons is required.
The planning applicatfon and NIS report will be made to Monaghan County Council under Sectfon 34 of the Planning
and Development Acts 2000 to 2018 for the erectfon of a single 850kW wind turbine and associated works.
For the purposes of this NIS report, where the proposed project is referred to, this relates to the development site and
associated infrastructure works.
table 1.1: Townlands containing the overall proposed project infrastructure.
Project Components Townland(s)
Erectfon of a 850kW turbine & associated works Dundrumman, Scotstown, Co. Monaghan.
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 6 | P a g e
Sectfon 2: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
2.1 Project Locatfon
The project site is located at Dundrumman, Scotstown, Co. Monaghan (X 656556, Y 837128)(ITM). The Proposed
Development site lies approximately 4km west of the village of Scotstown, 11km northwest of Monaghan town and
only 2.7km east of the border between the Republic and Northern Ireland (see Figure 2.1).
The area subject to the planning applicatfon is approximately 1.6 acres and lies within a field approximately 4.9 acres
which is under the control of applicant. The project site consists of improved agricultural grassland, grazed by cattle.
The surrounding area is predominantly improved agricultural land, with several residentfal dwellings and agricultural
buildings scattered across the landscape and some areas dominated by scrub. The Maghery stream (EPA code: 36M03)
is the nearest watercourse to the project site, flowing west to east approximately 150m west of the site boundary.
There are various other watercourse within 2km of the proposed site, however they are minor streams and ar e not
hydrologically connected to the Proposed Development site.
An unnamed local road runs along the western boundary of the proposed site which experiences a high level of traffic
from local residents and traffic associated with the local meat productfon facilitfes. The project site is owned and
managed by Connolly Meats Ltd., a local meat wholesale business. The company has various facilitfes and buildings on
adjacent lands including packaging facilitfes and agricultural sheds. The nearest private dwel lings is situated directly
across the road from the Proposed Development to the southwest.
The soil profile underpinning the Proposed Development site and surrounding area is predominantly Surface &
Groundwater Gleys, with some patches of Basin Peats & Blanket Bogs and Alluvium along the watercourses. The areas
of Basin Peats & Blanket Bogs in the surrounding area are mostly covered by scrub consistfng of Gorse (Ulex europaeus)
and various grasses and Juncus species.
The Slieve Beagh Special Protectfon Area (SPA) (004167) is located approximately 2.2km north of the Proposed
Development site. The Slieve Beagh SPA’s Qualifying Interest (QI) for which it is designated is Hen Harrier (Circus
cyaneus) and covers upland areas of blanket bog, highly suitable breeding habitat for Hen Harrier. Other protected and
rare species such as Merlin (Falco columbarius) and Red Grouse (Lagopus lagopus hibernicus) have been identffied as
breeding within the Slieve Beagh SPA. The other EU designated site within 15km of the Proposed Development is the
Kilroosky Lough Cluster Special Area of Conservatfon (SAC) (001786), which is located approximately 11km southwest
of the subject site. The (QI’s) for this SAC include aquatfc habitats and White-clawed Crayfish (Austropotamobius
pallipes). The NHA overlaps with a portfon of the Slieve Beagh SPA.
The Proposed Development site consists of improved agricultural grassland with hedgerows and treelines along the
site boundaries (see Appendix 1). The primary species of the improved agricultural grassland include a Perennial
Ryegrass hybrid (Lolium multiflorum x perenne), Yorkshire Fog (Holcus lanatus), Meadow Fox-tail (Alopecurus
pratensis), Curled Dock (Rumex crispus ssp.) and White-Clover (Trifolium repens). The hedgerow which follows the
boundary parallel to the public road consists primarily of Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna) with some Honeysuckle
(Lonicera periclymenum) and Cow Parsley (Anthriscus sylvestris). The hedgerows and treelines along the other
boundaries of the site consist of several species including Willow (Salix spp.), Ash (Fraxinus excelsior), Blackthorn
(Prunus spinosa), Bramble (Rubus fruticosus agg.) and Nettles (Urtica dioica).
A Phase 1 ecological walkover survey was completed on the 6th of July 2023, during which all species of flora and fauna
were surveyed paying partfcular attentfon for Qualifying Interests (QIs), Special Conservatfon Interests (SCIs) and
invasive species. No invasive species listed on the Third Schedule of the 2011 European Communitfes (Birds and Natural
Habitats) Regulatfons were recorded during the walkover survey. It is an offense to disperse, spread or otherwise cause
the growth of any of the species listed as a Third Schedule species. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 7 | P a g e
Mitfgatfon measures are fully detailed in Sectfon 6 of this report. These measures ensure that there are no adverse
negatfve impacts on the existfng hydrological, hydrogeological and ecological features within and in the vicinity of the
Proposed Development site. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 8 | P a g e
Figure 2.1: Site Location of the Proposed Development RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 9 | P a g e
2.2 Project Descriptfon
The Proposed Development consists of the erectfon of a single 850kW wind turbine and associated works. The
proposed turbine will have a maximum height of 91 meters, 65m hub height and 26m blade length, and will be located
on land currently classed as improved agricultural grassland (GA1). The turbine will be located centred at Eastfng
656562, Northing 837124 (ITM).
The development will include an associated transformer located within or adjacent to the turbine, buried electrical
and fibre-optfc cabling between the Connolly Meats sites, and new turbine foundatfons. The proposed turbine will be
situated on lands adjacent to existfng Connolly Meats facilitfes.
The project will entail the excavatfon of approximately 420 cubic meters of soil, the installatfon of roughly 50 square
meters of shuttering, the use of around 15 tonnes of reinforcement steel, and the pouring of approximately 320
cubic meters of concrete, subject to the final foundatfon design. Additfonally, the development includes the
constructfon of a haul road and a standing pad, which will require approximately 100 cubic meters of stone and
several rolls of geotextfle, contfngent on the ground conditfons. The project will also encompass the installatfon of
necessary pipework, ductwork, cabling, and electrical connectfons.
The foundatfon constructfon is antfcipated to span approximately two weeks. Subsequently, afler allowing sufficient
curing tfme, a suitable day for the turbine's erectfon will be selected, taking into consideratfon weather conditfons
(such as wind and rain) and the availability of resources.
The wind turbine, with a capacity of 850kW, will be delivered to the site in sectfons. It is antfcipated to be assembled
over a one-week period, weather permitting. The erectfon of the tower, nacelle, and blades is expected to be
completed in a single day.
Constructfon is projected to commence approximately two months afler receiving planning permission, allowing tfme
for final design procurement and other preparatory work. A temporary site compound will be established in or near
the existfng Connolly Meats facility, facilitatfng easy access to necessary services and welfare facilitfes.
The main infrastructural components of the Proposed Development include:
− Townlands of Dundrumman, Scotstown, Co. Monaghan.
− A 850kW wind turbine, delivered to the site in sectfons.
− Approximately 420 cubic meters of excavatfon material.
− Approximately 15 tonnes of reinforcement steel.
− Approximately 320 cubic meters of concrete, subject to the final foundatfon design.
− A haul road and standing pad, requiring approximately 100 cubic meters of stone and several rolls of
geotextfle.
− Necessary pipework, ductwork, cabling, and electrical connectfons.
2.3 Potentfally Affected Natura 2000 Sites
The Natfonal Parks & Wildlife Services (NPWS) and European Protectfon Agency (EPA) website and records were
consulted to identffy the Natura 2000 sites within a 15km Zone of Influence (ZoI) around the Proposed Development.
Each Natura 200 site within the ZoI was assessed to determine if direct physical or hydrological connectfon exists
between them and the Proposed Development site. The Special Areas of Conservatfon (SAC) and Special Protectfon
Areas (SPAs) within 15km of the subject site are shown in Appendix 1. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 10 | P a g e
Two Natura 2000 sites fall with the proposed site’s ZoI: Slieve Beagh SPA (004167) and Kilroosky Lough Cluster SAC
(001786)(see Figure 2.2). Neither protected site is physically nor hydrologically connected to the Proposed
Development site. The Slieve Beagh SPA lies in close proximity to the development site, only 1.9km north. The Kilroosky
Lough Cluster SAC is 10.9km southwest of the proposed site, with no hydrological connectfon. According to the WFD
assessment accompanying this planning applicatfon, there is a hydrological connectfon between the Lough Oughter
and Associated Loughs SAC (IE000007). It was assessed that given the 37.7km hydrological distance between the
Proposed Development and the Lough Oughter and Associated Loughs SAC (IE000007), there is no potentfal for the
Proposed Development to negatfvely impact the water quality of any Natura 2000 Site.
Due the close proximity of the Slieve Beagh SPA to the development, it has been screening in for potentfal impacts as
a result of the development.
2.4 Potentfally Affected Habitats/Species
The lands subject to potentfal impacts during and as a result of the proposed constructfon will include the development
site itself and the surround in lands.
The habitats within the Proposed Development site and the immediate surrounding area would be at risk of potentfal
impacts as a result of the proposed constructfon. However the habitats in the area of the development are primarily
improved agricultural habitats and therefore are of low ecological va lue. Furthermore the potentfal impacts to the
habitats are relatfvely low and localised.
The Slieve Beagh SPA consists of habitats which include upland blanket bogs, cutover bogs, wet and dry heaths, areas
of Sitka Spruce plantatfons, rough grazing grasslands, wet semi-rich grasslands and several small dystrophic ponds.
Habitats such as blanket bog, heaths and rough grazing are utflised by roostfng and breeding Hen Harrier (Circus
cyaneus), for which the SPA is designated. None of these habitat types occur on the Proposed Development site. The
habitats that occur within the SPA are not at risk of potentfally being affected by the constructfon of the Proposed
Development through destructfon or deterioratfon as the site is not hydrologically or physically connected to the site.
The wildlife at risk of being impacted by the Proposed Development site include species that commonly occur across
agricultural landscapes. Mammals including Red Fox and Badger may be disturbed or slightly displaced as a result of
the Proposed Development however the impacts are not likely to be significant as no dens or setts were identffied on
the site and the ample suitable habitat for the species exist in the wider landscape. The bird species which occur on
the proposed site are also typical to agricultural landscape and are not likely to be significantly impacted by the
development.
As previously mentfoned, Hen Harrier is the QI of the nearby Slieve Beagh SPA and therefore the species is at risk of
being impacted by the Proposed Development. The extent of the potentfal impacts on the species is fully considered
in following sectfons.
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 11 | P a g e
Figure 2.2: Natura 2000 Sites within the Zone of Influence RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 12 | P a g e
Sectfon 3: EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
3.1 Baseline Ecology
The study area has been mapped in detail, following a phase 1 habitat survey, and was cross referenced with ‘A Guide
to Habitats in Ireland’ (Fossitt, 2000). The findings of the Phase 1 habitat survey are described below, while habitat
maps and photographs showing the extent of habitats within the Proposed Development site are presented in Figure
3.1 below and Appendix 1 and 3.
The area subject to the planning applicatfon is approximately 1.6 acres and lies within a field approximate ly 4.9 acres
which is under the control of applicant. The surveyed area consists of a single field classified as improved agricultural
grassland (GA1) with hedgerows (WL1) and treelines (WL2) along the site boundary. The land is currently used for
livestock grazing, mainly cattle. The surrounding area is predominantly improved agricultural land, with several
residentfal dwellings and agricultural buildings scattered across the landscape and some areas dominated by scrub. An
unnamed local road runs along the western boundary of the proposed site which experiences a high level of traffic
from local residents and traffic associated with the local meat productfon facilitfes. The soil profile underpinning the
Proposed Development site and surrounding area is predominantly Surface & Groundwater Gleys, with some patches
of Basin Peats & Blanket Bogs and Alluvium along the watercourses. The areas of Basin Peats & Blanket Bogs in the
surrounding area are mostly covered by scrub consistfng of Gorse (Ulex europaeus) and various grasses and Juncus
species. The Maghery stream (EPA code: 36M03) is the nearest watercourse to the project site, flowing west to east
approximately 150m west of the site boundary.
The Slieve Beagh Special Protectfon Area (SPA) (004167) is located approximately 1.9km north of the Proposed
Development site. The Slieve Beagh SPA’s Qualifying Interest (QI) for which it is designated is Hen Harrier (Circus
cyaneus) and covers upland areas of blanket bog, highly suitable breeding habitat for Hen Harrier. The other EU
designated site within 15km of the Proposed Development is the Kilroosky Lough Cluster Special Area of Conservatfon
(SAC) (001786), which is located approximately 11km southwest of the subject site. The (QI’s) for this SAC include
aquatfc habitats and White-clawed Crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes).
3.2 Desktop Study and Informatfon Sources
An ecological desktop study was undertaken to inform this screening assessment and Natura Impact Statement report.
The desktop study comprised a review of the following key datasets and informatfon sources:
• Identfficatfon of Natura 2000 Sites within the Zone of Influence (ZoI) of the Proposed Development area
through the identfficatfon of potentfal pathways/links from the Proposed Development area and Natura 2000
Sites and/or supportfng habitats.
• Review of the Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) site synopsis, Natura 2000 data forms and
Conservatfon Objectfves for Natura 2000 Sites identffied through potentfal pathways from the Proposed
Development (https://www.npws.ie/protected-sites).
• Review of available literature and web data. This included a detailed review of the NPWS and Natfonal
Biodiversity Data Centre (NBDC) websites including mapping and available reports for relevant sites and in
partfcular Qualifying Interests and Special Conservatfon Interests described and their Conservatfon Objectfves.
• GIS Online mapping (http://dcenr.maps.arcgis.com; and EPA Mapping database
(https://gis.epa.ie/EPAMaps/AAGeoTool).
In additfon, aerial photography (Google Earth, Bing Maps) and mapping (Ordnance Survey of Ireland, Geological Survey
of Ireland) were used to identffy non-designated habitats such as rivers, woodlands, and hedgerows of local ecological
importance. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 13 | P a g e
3.3 Field Study
An ecological multf-disciplinary survey was completed by Sara Sheridan BSc MSc and James Glackin, ACIEEM, Ecologists
with Veon Ecology. A site investfgatfon at the Proposed Development site located in Dundrumman, Scotstown, Co.
Monaghan, was undertaken on the 6th of July 2023 and the 30th April 2026, following best practfce guidance
methodologies for multf-disciplinary walkover surveys, as per the Natfonal Road Authority (NRA) (2008). Weather
conditfons on the day of the survey mild, with regular light showers and a moderate breeze.
The site was searched for evidence of Annex I habitats and Annex II species listed on the EU Habitats Directfve
(92/43/EEC). The site was also searched for the presence of invasive plant species listed in Part 1 of the Third Schedule
of S.I No. 477 of 2011, European Communitfes (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulatfons (2011). Findings of the surveys
were used to inform this NIS and are summarised below.
The purpose of the investfgatfon was to define the site in terms of conservatfon status, habitat type and general
compositfon, to identffy any Annex I habitats or Annex II species and to take cognisance of the fact that some Annex
species may not be present or easily observed, and as such should identffy if suitable habitat for the species is present.
It may then be assumed, using the precautfonary principle, that the species is potentfally present on the site. Note that
Annex I habitats may be defined using indicator species which may not be present at tfme of survey.
The site was divided into different habitats and observatfons of fauna species present and surrounding land uses were
also made in additfon to research of available informatfon from Biological Records Centre (NBDC, 2022) presented in
Appendix 1.
The following methodologies were adopted for this study:
Habitat identification follows:
• Fossitt, J. A. (2000) A Guide to Habitats in Ireland. The Heritage Council, Kilkenny
Plant species identification follows:
• Webb, D. A., Parnell, J. and Doogue, D. (1996) An Irish Flora. Dundalgan Press, Dundalk
• Hubbard, C. E. (1992) Grasses: A Guide to their Structure, Identification, Uses and Distribution in the British
Isles. Penguin Books, Middlesex.
• Smith, A. J. E. (2004) The Moss Flora of Britain & Ireland. 2nd Ed. Cambridge
• Jermy, A. C., Chater, A. O. & David. R. W. (1982) Sedges of the British Isles: BSBI Handbook No. 1. BSBI, London.
Nomenclature follows:
• Stace, C. (2010) New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press.
Mammals:
• Hayden, T., Harrington, R. (2000) Exploring Irish Mammals. Town House & Country House Ltd. Dublin.
Avifauna:
• Cleave, A. (1995) Birds of Britain & Europe. Chancellor Press, Hong Kong.
3.3.1 Habitat Overview
The area subject to the planning applicatfon is approximately 1.6 acres and lies within a field approximately 4.9 acres
which is under the control of applicant. The Proposed Development site consists of an improved agricultural grassland
used for livestock grazing (GA1) with hedgerows (WL1) and treelines (WL2) along the site boundaries.
The improved agricultural grassland (GA1) consisted of common agricultural grass and weed species such as Perennial
Rye-grass hybrid (Lolium multiflorum x perenne), Yorkshire Fog (Holcus lanatus), Meadow Fox-tail (Alopecurus RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 14 | P a g e
pratensis), Curled Dock (Rumex crispus ssp.) and White-Clover (Trifolium repens). A public road (BL3) runs along the
eastern boundary of the site. The hedgerow (WL1) which follows the boundary parallel to the public road consists
primarily of Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna) with some Honeysuckle (Lonicera periclymenum) and Cow Parsley
(Anthriscus sylvestris). The hedgerows (Wl1) and treelines (WL2) along the other boundaries of the site consist of
several species including Willow (Salix spp.), Ash (Fraxinus excelsior), Blackthorn (Prunus spinosa), Bramble (Rubus
fruticosus agg.), Nettles (Urtica dioica), Gorse (Ulex europaeus) and Holly (Ilex aquifolium). The improved agricultural
grassland and hedgerows and treelines on-site provide no suitable habitat for breeding or roostfng Hen Harrier. The
land surrounding the site consists of similar habitats, again not providing any suitable habitat for the species.
The landscape surrounding the proposed sire is characterised by improved agricultural land (GA1), with sev eral
scattered residentfal dwellings and agricultural buildings (BL3) and some outcrops of scrub (WS1) dominated by Gorse
(Ulex europaeus) and Bramble (Rubus fruticosus agg.). Large agricultural buildings and industrial meat wholesale
buildings (BL3) operated by Connolly Meats Ltd are situated north and south if the Proposed Development site. The
Maghery stream (FW1/FW2) is the nearest watercourse to the project site, flowing west to east approximately 150m
west of the site boundary. Kilmere Lake (EPA segment code: 03_93), a small freshwater lake (FL1), exists approximately
1km northwest of the proposed site, as well as Drumloo Lake (EPA segment code: 36_211) (FL1) approximately 1.5km
southeast of the proposed site.
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 15 | P a g e
Figure 2.3: Habitat within the Redline Boundary RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 16 | P a g e
3.3.2 Avifauna
The avifauna identffied on and around the Proposed Development site is typical of an agricultural landscape. Corvids
and passerine species are abundant in the locality, likely nestfng in the hedgerows and treelines during the breeding
season. The multf-disciplinary survey conducted on-site recorded many small and medium passerine species included
Robin (Erithacus rubecula), Goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis), and Woodpigeon (Columba palumbus). Species such as
these nest in dense hedgerows and treelines. Swallows (Hirundo rustica) were also recorded on-site and were thought
to be nestfng in the surrounding residentfal dwellings and agricultural buildings. Large flocks of Jackdaws (Corvus
monedula) of up to 80 individual birds were also recorded over the proposed site and the surrounding area. Fewer
numbers of Rooks (Corvus frugilegus) also flocked with the Jackdaws. Corvid species such as these nest locatfons
including trees and old buildings.
Table 3.1: Bird species recorded during the Phase 1 Habitat Survey
Bird species recorded during the Phase 1 Habitat Survey
Common Name Scientific Name Designations/Conservation Status
Black-billed Magpie Pica pica Green List
Common Blackbird Turdus merula Green List
Woodpigeon Columba palumbus Green List
Rook Corvus frugilegus Green List
Eurasian Jackdaw Corvus monedula Green List
Hooded Crow Corvus cornix Green List
Swallow Hirundo rustica Amber List
Robin Erithacus rubecula Green List
Goldfinch Carduelis carduelis Green List
House Sparrow Passer domesticus Amber List
No Hen Harrier or signs of species were recorded during the field survey, either on-site or during the driving transect.
Although Hen Harrier actfvity is high relatfve to the rest of the country in upland area of the SPA, the species’ actfvity
on and around the proposed development site is low.
The National Biodiversity Data Centre (NBDC) records report no protected species of bird within the 2km grid square
‘H52T’, in which the proposed development is located (NBDC, 2023). The NBDC records for the 10km grid square ‘H53’
reported multiple protected bird species, including; Barn Owl, Kestrel, Snipe, Swift, Curlew, Teal, Woodcock, Great
Crested Grebe, Hen Harrier, Merlin, Lapwing, Red Grouse, Tufted Duck and Whooper Swan (NBDC, 2023). Most of
these records of the protected species within the 10km grid square, were recorded for the Bird Atlas 2007 -2011
(Balmer et al. 2013).
A consultation of NBDC online database to identified specific records of Hen Harrier sightings in the area of the
proposed development site. As expected, there are multiple records of Hen Harrier sightings in the ‘H53’ 10km grid
square, both confirmed individual sightings and sightings recorded as part of the Birds Atlas 2007 -2011 (Balmer et
al. 2013). Once the search was narrowed to sightings of the species that can be located to a precision of 2km or 1km
grid
squares, there were significantly fewer records as you move further out of the Slieve Beagh SPA. A confirmed sighting
of a male Hen Harrier was recorded in March 2020 (NBDC, 2023). The location of the sighting can be narrowed to a
precision of 1km of the Irish grid reference ‘H5638’ (NBDC, 2023). The grid reference given for the sighting is just
over 1km northwest of the proposed development site. Considering the time of year that the s ighting was recorded
it is likely that the male bird was scouting for or establishing a territory and/or searching for females (Hardey et al.
2013).
The NBDC online database was also consulted for records of Merlin (NBDC, 2023). There were significantly le ss
records of Merlin sightings and all records that were found came from the 2009 -11 Bird Atlas (Balmer et al. 2013).
The location of the Bird Atlas records of Merlin were narrowed to a precision of only 2km. The sightings were
narrowed the ‘H53E’ and ‘H53P’ 2km grid squares, which both are partly included by the Slieve Beagh SPA RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 17 | P a g e
(NBDC, 2023).
Although Kestrel is not an Annex I species under the Birds Directive (2009/147/EC), it is a Red List species,
experiencing steep declines in Ireland in recent years. The NBDC records for Kestrel in the area of the proposed
development were mostly historic records from the Breeding Bird Atlas 1988-1991. The 2009-2011 Bird Atlas did
record the species also, again down to a precision of 2km in grid square ‘H53P’, which the proposed site is not located
in (NBDC, 2023). There was an individual recording of a Kestel, sex unknown, in February of 2018, at Irish grid
reference ‘H548399’ (NBDC, 2023). The abundance and breeding status of the species in the area is unknown.
National surveys for protected bird species are typically limited to the locations of sites for which they are designated
such as SPA’s. Therefore although species such as Merlin are known to breed in the Slieve Beagh SPA, the national
Merlin survey in 2018 did not cover the Slieve Beagh SPA as Merlin are not a QI.
The Proposed Development site is located in area defined as ‘Low Sensitfvity’ under the Bird Sensitfvity Mapping for
Wind Energy, with a score of 19 (BWI, 2023; McGuinness et al. 2015). An area with a score of 14.8 – 23.4 is classified
as ‘Low Sensitfvity’ according to McGuinness et al. (2015). The only species of bird with a sensitfvity score in the area
of the development is Hen Harrier (BWI, 2023).
All bird species that were seen or heard during the survey period are presented in Appendix 2.
3.3.3 Mammals
No underground mammal dwellings, including Badger (Meles meles) setts or Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) dens , were
encountered on the Proposed Development site during the survey. No evidence of mammal presence such a prints,
scats or hair was observed during the survey on the site. However, some gaps and in the hedgerows and treelines along
the site boundary were observed during the survey on-site and these may be trails used by commutfng mammals such
as Badgers and Foxes. Mammals such as these two species are common occurrences in an agricultural landscape.
Badger have been recorded in the NBDC 2km grid square ‘H53T’ in which the Proposed Development lies (NBDC, 2023).
It is likely that Badgers and Foxes use the proposed site as part of a commutfng corridor however they do not dwell on
the site.
A specific bat survey was not conducted; however the proposed site and immediate surrounding area was assessed for
bat suitability. No potentfal roost sites were identffied on-site. A preliminary suitability assessment of the buildings in
the surrounding area, both residentfal and agricultural was conducted during the multf-disciplinary survey. All buildings
were of low suitability. No mature trees or trees with rot holes were identffied on-site or surrounding the site which
would be suitable for roostfng bats. It is possible that some bat species may utflise the treelines and hedgerows on the
proposed site and the surrounding are for foraging and commutfng.
The results of the Phase 1 habitat survey and photographs of the Proposed Development site are presented in full in
Appendix 2 and 4.
3.4 Hydrology & Water Quality
The European Protectfon Agency (EPA) assessed the biological water quality of the Maghery Stream (EPA code: 36M03)
at the Maghery bridge southwest of Kilmore (Statfon code: RS36M030200) (Eastfng 255072, Northing 336818) in 2022
as being of ‘Poor’ quality, with a Q Value of 2-3 (EPA, 2023). The stream flows west to east approximately 150m
southwest of the western site boundary. No hydrological pathways were identffied between the development site and
the Maghery Stream. The Proposed Development site lies in an area classified as ‘low vulnerability’ under the GSI
groundwater vulnerability assessment, meaning that there is a low level of risk of water contaminatfon as a result of
human actfvitfes in the area (EPA, 2023).
No records of water quality exist for Kilmere Lake (EPA segment code: 03_93) or Drumloo Lake (EPA segment code:
36_211) as they were not assessed under the Water Framework Directfve (2000/60/EC). RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 18 | P a g e
3.5 Geology & Soils
The Geological Survey of Ireland (GSI) online database and the Teagasc Natfonal Soil and Subsoil dataset were consulted
for the available informatfon on the soil and geology underpinning the Proposed Development site.
The Proposed Development site is positfoned on the Benbulben Shale bedrock formatfon which consists of calcareous
shale with minor calcarenite and an Aquifer of local importance (EPA, 2023; GSI, 2016). The subsoil profile underpinning
the Proposed Development site is mostly Sandstone & Shale Till from the Devonian and Carboniferous periods. The
subsoil profile of the wider landscape consists of the same Sandstone & Shale Till along with large areas of Sandstone
Till from the Devonian and Carboniferous periods, undifferentfated Alluvium and small areas of Bedrock at or near the
surface.
The soil types that unlay the Proposed Development site include Surface & Groundwater Gleys and Alluvium (see Figure
3.1)(Teagasc, EPA & GSI, 2006). Surface & Groundwater Gleys is the predominant soil type in the area surrounding the
site also with some outcrops of Basin Peats & Blanket Peats, Deep Peaty Gleys and Acid Brown Earths & Brown Podzols.
The Slieve Beagh SPA is underpinned predominantly by Surface & Groundwater Gleys and large areas if Blanket Peat. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 19 | P a g e
Figure3.1: Soil Profile within the Redline Boundary RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 20 | P a g e
Sectfon 4: STAGE 1. SCREENING FOR APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT
4.1 Overview of Potentfal Impacts
The Site Synopsis and Conservatfon Objectfves for the Slieve Beagh SPA (Site Code: 004167) names the site as one of
few strongholds for breeding Hen Harrier (Circus cyaneus) in the country (NPWS, 2012; NPWS, 2022). The main threats
identffied for the SPA are peat extractfon and walking paths & cycling tracks (EEA, 2022). Potentfal impacts to the
Qualifying Interests and the Conservatfon Objectfves of the Slieve Beagh SPA as a result of the Proposed Development
constructfon and operatfon include potentfal direct and indirect impacts to the Hen Harrier. The 2021 Hen Harrier
Monitoring report by the Hen Harrier Project stated the significant pressures to the local breeding Hen Harrier
populatfon is peat extractfon, forestry actfvitfes and recreatfon actfvitfes (HHP, 2021). Peat extractfon and illegal cutting
caused the failed breeding attempt of one pair in the SPA in 2021 (HHP, 2021).
A screening matrix of unmitfgated impacts on the Natura 2000 habitats and species found to be present, or considered
possibly present, is presented in Section 5. The reasons for decision in the screening matrix are detailed below.
Potentfal impacts on habitats and species not occurring within the zone of impact can be screened out.
There are a number of elements associated with the proposed constructfon works that may give rise to direct and
indirect impacts that have the potentfal to result in likely significant effects on Natura 2000 Sites. The significance of
these impacts depends on the scale of the impact as well as the ecological conditfon and the sensitfvitfes of the
qualifying interests. Elements of the Proposed Development that may give rise to impacts which have been considered
with regards to potentfal likely significant effects to Natura 2000 Sites are as follows:
• The introductfon or spread of invasive alien species due to constructfon works.
• Disturbance to fauna (e.g., through noise from constructfon actfvity and/or human presence) resultfng in the
displacement of affected species.
• Accidental mortality of wildlife from constructfon machinery during the constructfon period.
• Avian collision mortality with operatfonal wind turbine.
4.2 Determining the Likely Zone of Influence
Guidance on AA of Plans and Projects in Ireland notes that a distance of 15km is recommended in the case of plans,
derived from UK guidance. In some cases, the distance could be much less, or much more than 15km, but this must be
evaluated on a case-by-case basis with reference to the nature, size and locatfon of the Proposed Development, and
the sensitfvitfes of the ecological receptors and for the in-combinatfon effects (OPR, 2021).
Using the source-pathway-receptor (SPR) model an examinatfon of the potentfal effects of the Proposed Development
was undertaken (alone and in-combinatfon with other plans and projects) to identffy what Natura 2000 Sites, and
which of their Qualifying Interests or Special Conservatfon Interest species were potentfally at risk. This examinatfon
was used to determine the Zone of Influence (ZoI) for the Proposed Development. It is vital that an assessment of
potentfal pathways is undertaken to assess potentfal impact links between the receptor (Natura 2000 Sites) and source
(Proposed Development) to establish the risk of any likely significant effects. Additfonal designated sites including
proposed Natural Heritage Areas (pNHA’s), Natural Heritage Areas (NHA’s) sites were also reviewed, although they do
not form part of the AA, they oflen provide important supportfng functfons to Natura 2000 Sites.
With regards to potentfal habitat degradatfon effects associated with the release of sediment and other pollutants to
surface water, the ZoI of the Proposed Development is considered to include receiving water bodies adjacent to, or
downstream of, the Proposed Development site during the constructfon phase. The distance downstream is associated
with the current biological conditfon of the acceptfng water body and its capacity to accept and assimilate sediment RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 21 | P a g e
and other pollutants. The distance downstream is also associated with the sensitfvity of the Qualifying Interests of the
Natura 2000 Site which is hydrologically connected to the Proposed Development site.
Noise from constructfon actfvitfes has the potentfal to cause disturbance to restfng, foraging and commutfng Qualifying
Interest and Special Conservatfon Interest species. With regards to disturbance effects, the potentfal ZoI is considered
to be in the local vicinity (within 300m) of the Proposed Development during the Constructfon Phase. The proposed
works during the constructfon phase are antfcipated to generate relatfvely low levels of noise and only during permitted
constructfon hours. In general, machinery will be designed to ensure that the maximum nois e level 10m outside the
site boundary do not exceed an equivalent contfnuous sound level beyond what is recommended in the BSI Britfsh
Standards (BS5228-1:2009+A1:2014). It should be noted, no night works are antfcipated.
4.3 Identfficatfon of Relevant Natura 2000 Sites
The source-receptor-pathway (S-P-R) conceptual model was used to identffy a list of ‘relevant’ Natura 2000 Sites (i.e.,
those which could be potentfally affected by the Proposed Development). This conceptual model is a standard tool in
environmental assessment (OPR, 2021). In order for an effect to occur, all three elements of this mechanism must be
in place. The absence or removal of one of the elements of the mechanism means there is no li kelihood for the effect
to occur. In the context of the Proposed Development, the model comprises:
• Source (s) – e.g., Sediment run-off from Proposed Development works.
• Pathway (s) – e.g., Rivers and drains connectfng to a Natura 2000 Site.
• Receptor (s) – e.g., Special Conservatfon Interests (SCI) or Qualifying Interests (QI).
There are currently two Natura 2000 Sites within 15km of the Proposed Development (see Table 4.1 below): Slieve
Beagh SPA and Kilroosky Lough Cluster SAC. Of these Natura 2000 Sites, the Slieve Beagh SPA is considered relevant
based on proximity to the Proposed Development and source - receptor pathway relatfonships.
Table 4.1: Natura 2000 Sites located within 15 km of the Proposed Development site.
Designated Site Site Code Approximate Distance from Proposed Works
(km)
Slieve Beagh SPA 004167 1.9km
Kilroosky Lough Cluster SAC 001786 10.9km
Potentfal impacts and their significance, if any, within the Natura 2000 Sites are considered below. Impacts are
considered in light of the Conservatfon Objectfves/Special Conservatfon Interests for which these Natura 2000 Sites
are designated.
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 22 | P a g e
4.4 Stage 1: Screening of Relevant Natura 2000 Sites
4.4.1 Special Protectfon Areas (SPAs)
Natura site(s) Potential effects
to Natura Site Rationale
Slieve Beagh SPA (004167)
~1.9km
Yes
This SPA lies approx. 1.9km northwest of the Proposed
Development site. Due to the close proximity there is potentfal
for direct and indirect impacts on the following QIs as a result
of the development:
− [A082] Hen Harrier (Circus cyaneus)
There is a potentfal pathway (i.e., physical connectfvity) from
the source site and so the Qualifying Interests of this SPA could
be affected. Although, there is not much area of suitable
surrounding the redline boundary and no suitable habitat
within the redline boundary, the precautfonary principle was
used, therefore, this Natura 2000 can be considered a potentfal
receptor.
Based on this ratfonale, Slieve Beagh SPA has been screened in
for potentfal impacts.
4.4.2 Special Areas of Conservatfon (SACs)
Natura site(s)
Potential effects
to Natura Site Rationale
Kilroosky Lough Cluster SAC
(001786)
~10.9 km
No
This SAC lies
development.
being
approx. 10.9km southwest of the proposed
The Qualifying Interests of the SAC at risk of
impacted included:
[3140] Hard Water Lakes
[7210] Cladium Fens*
[7230] Alkaline fens
− [1092] White-clawed Crayfish (Austropotamobius
pallipes)
Due to the large distance and lack of connectfvity between the
SAC and the project site, there is no potentfal for the Natura
2000 site to experience impacts.
Based on this ratfonale, Kilroosky Lough Cluster SAC has been
screened-out for potentfal impacts.
* = Priority habitat under EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
The Water Framework Directfve (WFD) Assesment, accompanying this planning applicatfon concludes that the
Proposed Development shall not have any negatfve effects to the water quality of surrounding waterbodies due to its RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 23 | P a g e
separatfon between the nearest waterbody and the redline boundary of the Proposed Development, thus, hydrological
and hydrogeological connectfon with the Proposed Development and Natura 2000 Sites shall not be considered further.
Table 4.2: Natura 2000 Sites within the Proposed Development ’s Zone of Influence using SPR model.
Site Code Site Name Qualifying Interests / Special Conservation
Interest Species
Distance from
Study Area
Source-Pathway-Receptor
Connectivity
004167
Slieve Beagh SPA
[A082] Hen Harrier (Circus cyaneus)
~1.9km
northwest
There is a potentfal pathway
(i.e., physical connectfvity) from
the source site to the SPA and
so the Qualifying Interests of
this SPA could be affected.
Therefore, this Natura 2000 site
can be considered a potentfal
receptor. Although, there was
sightfngs of the Hen Harrier
and the habitat is not suitable
for Hen Harrier, a precautfonary
principle was applied to screen
this European Site in for further
assessment.
001786
Kilroosky Lough
Cluster SAC
[3140] Hard Water Lakes
[7210] Cladium Fens*
[7230] Alkaline fens
[1092] White-clawed Crayfish (Austropotamobius
pallipes)
~10.9km
southwest
No source pathway
connectfvity exist via surface
water, groundwater, physical
connectfvity or environmental
vectors. Therefore, the SAC is
not considered a potentfal
receptor.
* = Priority habitat under EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC)
4.6 Screening Conclusion
There is connectfvity between the Proposed Development site and the Slieve Beagh SPA (004167). Although the
proposed site is not directly connected to the SPA, the close proximity between the two locatfons means there is a
physical connectfon of sorts between them. As the qualifying interest of the Slieve Bea gh SPA is Hen Harrier, which
may commute in and out of the SPA and therefore potentfally linking the project site and the SPA directly.
In the case of the other designated Natura 2000 site which fall within 15km of the purposed development site, the
Kilroosky Lough Cluster SAC (001786), there exists no potentfal physical, hydrological or environmental pathways
between the site and the purposed development, therefore excluding the QIs from being at risk of being impacted.
Sectfon 5: STAGE 2. SCREENED IN NATURA 2000 SITES
5.1 Conservatfon Objectfves
Conservatfon objectfves for Natura 2000 Special Areas of Conservatfon (SACs) and Special Protectfon Areas (SPAs) have
to be set for the habitats and species for which the sites are selected. These objectfves are used when carrying out
appropriate assessments for plans and projects that might impact on these sites.
Site-specific conservatfon objectfves outline attributes with targets, which define favourable conditfon for a habitat or
species at a partfcular site. They are used for appropriate assessment of plans or projects. In additfon, they can provide
useful informatfon for conservatfon management planning. The maintenance of habitats and species within Natura RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 24 | P a g e
2000 sites at favourable conservatfon conditfon will contribute to the overall maintenance of favourable conservatfon
status of those habitats and species at a natfonal level.
The concept of favourable conservatfon status is central to the E.U. Habitats Directfve. Annex I habitats, Annex II
species, and habitats of Annex II species (of the Habitats Directfve), as well as the Birds Directfve Annex I species and
other species designated as Special Conservatfon Interests must be maintained at or restored to favourable
conservatfon status.
In summary, it is required that the range and areas of the listed habitats, and the range and populatfon of the listed
species, should be at least maintained at their status at the tfme of designatfon. Site -specific conservatfon objectfves
for each Natura 2000 Site aim to define favourable conservatfon conditfons for habitats/species of the site.
European and natfonal legislatfon places a collectfve obligatfon on Ireland and its citfzens to maintain at favourable
conservatfon status areas designated as SAC and SPA. The Government and its agencies are responsible for the
implementatfon and enforcement of regulatfons that will ensure the ecological integrity of these sites.
Favourable conservatfon status of a habitat is achieved when:
• Its natural range, and area it covers within that range, are stable or increasing.
• The specific structure and functfons which are necessary for its long-term maintenance exist and are likely to
contfnue to exist for the foreseeable future.
• The conservatfon status of its typical species is favourable.
The favourable conservatfon status of a species is achieved when:
• Populatfon dynamics data on the species concerned indicate that it is maintaining itself on a long-term basis
as a viable component of its natural habitats.
• The natural range of the species is neither being reduced nor is likely to be reduced for the foreseeable
future.
• There is, and will probably contfnue to be, a sufficiently large habitat to maintain its pop ulatfons on a
longterm basis.
The integrity of a Natura 2000 Site (referred to in Artfcle 6.3 of the EU Habitats Directfve) is determined based on the
conservatfon objectfves and of the site. The Qualifying Interests (QI) and Special Conservatfon Interests (SCI) are
obtained through a review of the most recently published (web-published or otherwise) Conservatfon Objectfve
supportfng documents and Site-Specific Conservatfon Objectfves documents (where available) for the Natura 2000 Site.
5.2 Natura 2000 Site Descriptfons
Site descriptions for the relevant Natura 2000 Sites within the project ZoI are presented below.
Slieve Beagh SPA (004167)
The Slieve Beagh SPA comprises much of the eastern and south-eastern sectors of the Slieve Beagh upland area that
extends from County Monaghan into Northern Ireland1. Upland blanket bog habitat is well developed at the higher
altftudes including on the Eshbrack, which is 365m high at its peak. This area of well intact blanket bog falls within the
Eshbrack Bog NHA (Site code: 001603). The vegetatfon of the blanket bog habitat is dominated by Deergrass (Scirpus
cespitosus), Ling Heather (Calluna vulgaris), Cross-leaved Heath (Erica tetralix), Hare’s-tail Cottongrass (Eriophorum
vaginatum), Common Cottongrass (E. angustifolium) and mosses including several Sphagnum species (NPWS, 2012).
1 As per the OPR (2021) guidance, the sectfon of the Slieve Beagh SPA that extends into Northern Ireland has not been considered
as it no longer forms part of the Natura network. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 25 | P a g e
Bog and heath habitats cover approximately 43% of the SPA site (NPWS, 2012). A large portfon of the site is covered in
forestry plantatfons including areas of clear-fell, mature closed canopy and newly replanted open canopy (NPWS,
2012). Some more lowland areas of the SPA were previously used for upland grazing and are now rough grassland
habitats (NPWS, 2012). Some small upland dystrophic lakes are also scattered across the SPA.
Hen Harrier is the only Qualifying Interest (QI) of the Slieve Beagh SPA. The most recent report on breeding Hen Harrier
in SPAs across Ireland is from 2021 by the Hen Harrier Project (HHP, 2021). The 2021 report confirmed three breeding
pairs of Hen Harrer in the Slieve Beagh SPA with two pairs successfully fledging one chick each (HHP, 2021). The third
pair failed to breed successfully as they were disturbed by local turf cutting and then abandoned their nest due to
surrounding disturbance and illegal burning (HHP, 2021). The Hen Harrier populatfon fluctuates from year to year, bu t
this is thought to be due to the movement of pairs between nest sites that lay over the border with Northern Ireland
(see Figure 2.2 below) and therefore the Slieve Beagh breeding populatfon is thought to be stable (HHP, 2021).
The site-specific conservatfon objectfves for the Slieve Beagh SPA include the maintenance of the breeding populatfon
of Hen Harrier within the SPA at 3-4 confirmed breeding pairs a year, a minimum of 1 to 1.4 successful fledging’s per
pair and other objectfves that support these targets such as habitat maintenance and avoidance of disturbance (NPWS,
2022).
5.3 Supportfng Habitats and Species
Slieve Beagh SPA (004167)
Species:
• Hen Harrier (Circus cyaneus) [A082]
The destructfon or disruptfon of key habitats, partfcularly peatlands, would be detrimental to the success of the
breeding populatfon of Hen Harrier in the Slieve Beagh SPA. The conservatfon objectfves for the Slieve Beagh SPA
includes the maintenance of the extent and conditfon of bog and heath habitats and associated habitats in the SPA and
the maintenance of a low level of disturbance to breeding Hen Harrier (NPWS, 2022). The destructfon of habitat was
the cause of a failed breeding attempt of one breeding pair of Hen Harrier in 2021 as a result of turf cutting and illegal
burning (HHP, 2021).
The Proposed Development will not significantly impact on the supportfng habitats of the SPA as there is no suitable
habitat for Hen Harrier within the redline boundary. The potentfal impacts that the Proposed Development may have
on the QI of the SPA are likely noise disturbance and collision mortality. The mitfgatfon measures for the potentfal
impacts are described in Sections 6. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 26 | P a g e
5.4 Threats and Pressures
Threats and pressures published for the Slieve Beagh SPA are presented in Table 5.1 below.
Slieve Beagh SPA (Site code: 004167)
Table 5.1: Negative Threats, Pressures and Activities for Slieve Beagh SPA.
Slieve Beagh SPA
Threat Code1 Threat Type Rank2 i (inside) / o (outside) / b (both)
C01.03 Peat extractfon M i
D01.01 Paths, tracks and cycling tracks L i
D01.02 Roads and motorways L i
5.5 Potentfal Impacts from the Proposed Development
Potentfal effects associated with the Proposed Development to the Qualifying Habitats and Species of Natura 2000
Sites within the project Zone of Influence are as follows:
Table 5.2: Impact Source - Pathway and Zone of Influence for the proposed project
Source of Potential Effect Description of Pathway Potential Zone of Influence of the
Effect
Construction Phase
−
−
−
−
−
Noise
Vibratfon
Human presence/ visual
deterrence
Movements of vehicles associated
with constructfon actfvitfes
Terrestrial - contact (direct contact with
constructfon personnel or machinery
during site works), air (through its ability
to transmit noise and associated noise
disturbance), visibility (on site presence
of constructfon personnel and
disturbance due to human presence).
The Zone of Influence varies depending
on habitat and species in questfon. Hen
Harrier are thought to have Medium
sensitfvity to disturbance (Goodship &
Furness, 2022). HH sensitfvity to visual
and audio disturbance (e.g. forestry
operatfons) is a min of 500m from nest
site during breeding season (Ruddock &
Whitiield, 2007). Alert distance (AD) for
HH on average is 225m-310m and Flight
Initfatfon Distance (FID) 30m-225m
(Goodship & Furness, 2022).
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 27 | P a g e
Source of Potential Effect Description of Pathway Potential Zone of Influence of the
Effect
Operational Phase
• Collision Mortality
• Disturbance
• Displacement
Direct – Avian collisions (esp. Hen
Harrier) with the turbine’s rotor blades
causing mortality.
Indirect – Displacement of HH due to the
visual impact of the turbine. Disturbance
and displacement of HH as a result of
human actfvity (e.g. turbine
maintenance, site traffic).
The rotor swept area of the turbine
occupies a 22m radius around the
turbine mast, and between 39m – 91m
above ground level. This rotor swept
area is the collision risk zone, with an
additfon ~5m as a precautfonary
principle.
The disturbance and displacement ZoI of
the proposed turbine for Hen Harrier in
partfcular is approx. 1km (Ruddock &
Whitiield, 2007; Whitiield & Madders,
2006). However this distance can vary
significantly depending on suitable
habitat and food availability. Arroyo et
al. (2014) reported males foraging on
average up to 2km from an actfve nest
and females 1km. Hen Harriers have
been recorded nestfng 200-300m from
an operatfonal wind farm (Whitiield &
Madders, 2006).
5.5.1 Habitat loss, disturbance and fragmentatfon
According to the Ornithology Report associated with the planning applicatfon, the habitat within the redline is not
suitable for Hen Harrier. Habitats adjacent to and surrounding the Proposed Development site primarily consist of
improved agricultural grassland, built land and some small areas of scrub, all of which will not be impacted significantly
by the purposed works. The existfng habitats on the proposed site and the surrounding land are improved ag ricultural
habitats and/or built land and therefore shall not support Hen Harrier nestfng.
The proposed works associated with the development would involve the disruptfon of agricultural grassland for the
installatfon of the turbine, including excavatfons, pouring of concrete areas and laying of access tracks on site. The
removal of hedgerows and treelines would also be required as a result of these works however none of these habitats
are of high ecological value. The Proposed Development would not result in the fragmentatfon of ecologically
important habitats, partfcularly habitats important to Hen Harrier such as heath and peatland. Thus, there is no
potentfal to negatfvely cause habitat loss, disturbance and fragmentatfon.
5.5.2 Non-natfve and invasive species
No high impact invasive plant species (as listed by NBDC) were recorded during the site visits at the Proposed
Development site. Likewise, there were no plant species recorded on Third Schedule applying to non -natfve species
subject to restrictfons under Regulatfons 49 of S.I. No. 477/2011 - European Communitfes (Birds and Natural Habitats)
Regulatfons 2011 within the Proposed Development site or its immediate environs.
The potentfal spread of invasive, non-natfve species has been identffied as a pathway for the transmission of impacts
affectfng Annex I species of the Bird’s Directfve for which the Slieve Beagh SPA. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 28 | P a g e
The requirement for fill material or machinery employed within the site during the constructfon phase may potentfally
result in the importatfon of non-natfve species, both aquatfc and terrestrial. Plants and pathogens can be transported
with the machinery and equipment. Stringent and robust mitfgatfon measures are proposed for the avoidance of
impacts affectfng water quality during the Proposed Development constructfon in order to protect the Annex I habitats
Annex species. Machinery should always be cleaned before entering the site to avoid transport of alien invasive species.
5.5.3 Avifauna
Although, there was no Hen Harriers recorded within the redline boundary within the Ornithology Report
accompanying this planning applicatfon. A precautfonary principle has been applied to during this assessment and has
considered the potentfal for Hen Harrier to be negatfvely impacted through collision with the blades of the Proposed
Wind Turbine.
5.6 Potentfal Adverse Effects & Proposed Mitfgatfon
Slieve Beagh SPA (004167)
Conservation objectives:
Generic CO’s: To maintain or restore the favourable conservation condition of the habitats and species listed as Qualifying Interests
for this SPA. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 29 | P a g e
Table 5.3: Conservation Objectives for the Slieve Beagh SPA
Slieve Beagh SPA
Qualifying Interest(s) Potential Adverse Effect Mitigation
Hen Harrier (Circus cyaneus) [A082]
EU Birds Directfve: Annex I
Bern Conventfon: Annex II
Birds of Conservatfon Concern: Amber
Hen Harrier or signs of HH actfvity were
not recorded onsite, or within the
immediate vicinity of the site, during the
ecological walkover survey.
HH have been recorded within the
NBDC 10km grid square and are the QI
for the SPA 1.9 km north.
Precautionary Measures:
Minimising of the footprint of works to
limit noise & human disturbance.
Fatality monitoring during the
operatfonal phase and appropriate
response consultatfon and measures if
needed.
5.7 Summary of Potentfal Impacts
The assessment of the potentfal for adverse effects on the qualifying interests of the Slieve Beagh SPA using the source
-pathway-receptor (SPR) model, identffied qualifying interests at risk of potentfal adverse effects associated with the
Proposed Development works in the absence of any mitfgatfon measures.
There is physical, direct, and indirect pathway connectfons between the Proposed Development and the Slieve Beagh
SPA. Works associated with the constructfon phase o f the Proposed Development have the unlikely potentfal to cause
disturbance and displacement to Hen Harrier, the Qualifying Interest of the SPA. There will be no direct disturbance or
destructfon of habitats essentfal to Hen Harrier e.g., peatlands and heath, as a result of the Proposed Development.
Potentfal impacts as a result of the operatfonal phase of the development include disturbance, displacement and
collision mortality.
The works associated with the constructfon phase of the proposed development will potentfally impact on the QI of
the SPA causing disturbance and displacement. However, these potentfal impacts would likely be minimal as the
proposed development site lies outside the accepted disturbance zone distances for breeding and wintering HH and
there was no suitable habitats for Hen Harrier within or surrounding the redline boundary (Ruddock & Whitiield, 2017).
Mitfgatfon measures implemented during the constructfon phase of the development will further reduce the extent of
the potentfal impacts on the relevant Natura 2000 site(s).
Potentfal impacts of the operatfonal phase of the Proposed Development include disturbance, displacement and
collision mortality. Potentfal disturbance and displacement effects on Hen Harrier is likely minimal as the Hen Harrier
have been recorded breeding within 188m of operatfonal windfarms according to Ruddock & Whitiield, 2007,
meanwhile, the Proposed Development includes only a single turbine. Moreover, the Ornithology report accompanying
this report states that there are no suitable habitats within the redline boundary with negligible habitat suitability in
the immediate vicinity of the redline boundary. Collision risk with an operatfonal turbine is a potentfal, however the
low level of Hen Harrier actfvity on the Proposed Development site means the collision risk would be low.
Provided that the overarching policies, objectfves, best practfce, and mitfgatfon measures are adhered to, the potentfal
impacts as a result of the Proposed Development, are considered minimal. Mitfgatfon measures to be implemented
are outlined in Section 6. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 30 | P a g e
Sectfon 6: PROTECTIVE MITIGATION MEASURES
This sectfon presents the mitfgatfon measures that will be implemented during constructfon and operatfon of the
Proposed Development to avoid or reduce the potentfal impacts of the Proposed Development on the Slieve Beagh
SPA. All of the mitfgatfon measures will be implemented in full and are best practfce, tried and tested, effectfve control
measures to protect the receiving environment.
6.1 Design Phase Mitfgatfon
As part of the Proposed Development design, the proposed development footprint will be kept to a minimum. The site
selected for the Proposed Development consists of improved agricultural land surrounded by land of the same type
and areas of built land, all of which are of low ecological value. The limitfng of the proposed development to a single
turbine is another measure taken at the design phase to limit the extent of the impacts on the receiving environment.
6.2 Constructfon Phase Mitfgatfon
6.2.1 Inspectfon
In advance of constructfon commencing the pollutfon preventatfve measures detailed above will be assessed and
approved by a person appointed by the client. This person shall have overall responsibility for implementatfon of
environmental protectfon measures and will carry out routfne inspectfons of the measures to ensure their effectfveness
and the correct maintenance is being followed.
6.2.2 Control of Noise
Environmental noise arising from actfvitfes on site will be controlled in accordance with the requirements of Britfsh
Standard BS5228.
The following noise control measures for generated noise shall be implemented during the constructfon works:
• The hours of constructfon will be subject to the requirements and prior agreement with Monaghan County
Council.
• All contractors will ensure that the plant and constructfon methods employed are the quietest available for the
required purpose insofar as practfcable.
• All contractor vehicles will use existfng site access roads and constructfon compound area.
• Engines, vehicles and equipment will be switched off when not in use.
• Machinery having rotatfng parts will be serviced according to supplier recommendatfons to prevent frictfon
induced sound.
• Materials should be lowered, not dropped, insofar as practfcable and safely.
6.2.3 Flora and Fauna
There shall be on-going monitoring of wildlife in the vicinity of the constructfon site and any unusual species, dead
species or damaged habitats should be reported immediately to the Constructfon Manager and/or Environmental
Officer. This will be co-ordinated with the appointed Ecologist for the Proposed Development who will be responsible
for the ecological monitoring on-site. Where unexpected ecological habitats are uncovered the habitats protectfon
protocol will be adhered to by site contractors.
Protectfon Protocol
This protocol is designed to ensure that ALL persons working on the constructfon site are fully aware of their legal
obligatfons under the Wildlife Act 1976, as amended. This Act affords protectfon to a range of wildlife in Ireland RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 31 | P a g e
including wild birds, animals and plants. Where a project has received permission to proceed, this does not override
certain laws that prevent wilful harm to protected species.
• Weather conditfons shall be considered during the constructfon phase. Works may need to be halted during
or following periods of heavy rain or other conditfons likely to lead to large-scale or additfonal water flow that
would carry soil or silt into the local watercourses.
• All wild birds and their eggs, nests and young, with the exceptfon of certain species, are protected under the
Wildlife Acts. Certain animals including all bat species. Areas of the site found containing nests will be cordoned
off to a distance of 20 metres where possible from any nests and all plant and constructfon will remain outside
of this cordon untfl the young have fledged (lefl the nest entfrely). The 20-metre radius will be centred on the
nest site and each nest would be protected by an equivalent circle. All other areas are safe for operatfons.
When a 20m buffer zone around actfve birds’ nests is not possible due to constructfon works, alternatfve
mitfgatfon and guidelines will be adopted.
• Surveys of the area have already been carried out to locate where protected species may be living.
• Contractors may discover bat roosts and if any bats are found the works must halt and the NPWS contacted.
6.3 Operatfon Phase Mitfgatfon
The following mitfgatfons will be implemented during the operatfonal phase of the development:
• Yearly bird monitoring to be carried for a minimum of 2 years post constructfon, but ideally for up to 5 years.
• Both breeding and winter bird surveys, with partfcular emphasis placed on Hen Harrier, to be completed as
part of the monitoring. Surveys should include flight actfvity details (i.e. flight height and flight paths) of birds
observed.
• Fatality monitoring of the turbine to be conducted at minimum quarterly each year, for a minimum of 3 years
post constructfon. This shall implement canine fatality monitoring is implemented as canines have been proven
to be significantly more effectfve at identffying collision fatalitfes. Where there is one Hen Harrier collided with
the wind turbine per year, the Proposed Development shall undergo a redesign and shall implement Shutdown
on Demand, implement noise deterrents. The EcOW will be responsible for suggestfng and implementfng these
measures based on findings obtained from the yearly bird monitoring surveys.
• Blade visibility enhancement shall take place. This shall entail paintfng one blade black and use UV reflectfve
coatfngs on the blades.
6.4 Decommissioning Phase Mitfgatfon
Measures will be taken during the decommissioning phase to restore the site to a state similar to its former conditfon
or to a conditfon that is required for the future intended land use. Due to the longevity of the Proposed Development
changes to habitat and vegetatfon may occur. Inspectfons by an appropriately qualified person will be carried out during
decommissioning phase to certffy that the measures recommended are being implemented effectfvely and, if required,
removal of materials from the site will be halted and correctfve actfon taken. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 32 | P a g e
Sectfon 7: RESIDUAL EFFECT
Afler assessing the impacts of the proposed project all attempts should be made to avoid and mitfgate ecological
impacts. The Proposed Development will not result in the loss or fragmentatfon of habitats that are essentfal to the
Conservatfon Objectfves for the Slieve Beagh SPA.
This NIS has examined and analysed in the light of the best scientffic knowledge, the potentfal source -receptor
pathways and how these could impact on the designated site’s conservatfon objectfves, in or der to make an educated
assessment on whether or not these impacts are likely to adversely affect the integrity of the Natura 2000 Site(s).
Provided that the recommended mitfgatfon measures set out in Sections 6 are implemented in full, it is not expected
that significant impacts will result to the qualifying features identffied for appraisal in this NIS and thus it is not expected
that the proposed works will have an adverse impact on the integrity of the relevant Natura 2000 site(s). Assuming
that the mitfgatfons measures are implements accurately during the constructfon phase and recommended post-
constructfon monitoring is followed, then it is believed that there will not be significant residual effects on the receiving
environment and the Slieve Beagh SPA as a result of the Proposed Development.
There is no other Natura 2000 Site(s) at risk of effects from the Proposed Development. It has been objectfvely
concluded, following an examinatfon, analysis and evaluatfon of the relevant informatfon, including the nature of the
predicted impact from the Proposed Development, that the Proposed Development will not adversely affect (either
directly or indirectly) the integrity of the Slieve Beagh SPA or any other Natura 2000 Site, either alone or in combinatfon
with other plans or projects, and there is no reasonable scientffic doubt in relatfon to this conclusion. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 33 | P a g e
Sectfon 8: IN-COMBINATION EFFECT
The Proposed Development was considered in combinatfon with other plans and projects in the locality that could
result in cumulatfve / in-combinatfon effects on Natura 2000 Sites. In-combinatfon and cumulatfve impacts of the
project and plans within the Zone of Influence of the Proposed Development are considered below. Cumulatfve effects
can result from individually insignificant but collectfvely significant actfons taking place over a period of tfme or
concentrated within an area or locatfon.
Cumulatfve effects can occur where a Proposed Development results in impacts that when considered in-combinatfon
with impacts caused by other proposed or permitted projects and plans may result in a cumulatfve effect. Plans or
Projects Which Might Act in Combinatfon Artfcle 6(3) of the Habitats Directfve requires that, any plan or project not
directly connected with or necessary to the management of the Natura 2000 Site(s) but likely to have a significant
effect thereon, either individually or in combinatfon with other plans or projects, shall be subject to appropriate
assessment of its implicatfons for the site(s) in view of the site’s conservatfon objectfves.
8.1 County Development Plan
The purpose of the Monaghan County Development Plan for the period 2025-2031 is to guide the future development
of the county. Currently, the following sectfons of Monaghan County Council Development Plan 20 25-2031 apply to
this development:
HCLSO 1 To promote and encourage the conservation and preservation of the County’s natural environment,
cultural heritage and amenities in accordance with legislation, plans and policies developed to specifically
address these areas and to ensure a rich cultural landscape, healthy environment and the full provision of
ecosystems services in the County.
HCLO 2 To contribute as appropriate towards the protection of designated sites in compliance with relevant EU
Directives and applicable National Legislation.
HCLP 1 No projects giving rise to significant cumulative, direct, indirect or secondary impacts on Natura 2000
sites arising from their size or scale, land take, proximity, resource requirements, emissions (disposal to land,
water or air), transportation requirements, duration of construction, operation, decommissioning or from any
other effects shall be permitted on the basis of this plan (either individually or in combination with other plans
or projects6).
HCLO 12 To cumulatively contribute towards, in combination with other users and bodies, the achievement of
the objectives of the regulatory framework for environmental protection and management, including
compliance with EU Directives – such as the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC, as amended), the Birds Directive
(2009/147/EC), the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (2011/92/EU, as amended by 2014/52/EC) and
the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive (2001/42/EC), and relevant transposing Regulations
HCLO 16 To consult with the National Parks and Wildlife Service, where appropriate, and take account of their
views and any licensing requirements, when undertaking, approving or authorising development which is likely
to affect plant, animal or bird species protected by law.
HCLP 4 Any plan or project in the Plan area not directly connected with or necessary to the management of a
Natura 2000 site but likely to have a significant effect on a Natura 2000 site(s), either individually or in -
combination with other plans or projects, shall be subject to Appropriate Assessment, in view of the site’s
conservation objectives; in accordance with Article 6(3) and Article 6(4) of the Habitats Directives (92/43/EEC),
transposing national legislation, and applicable European and national guidelines.
HCLP 5 Monaghan County Council shall complete Appropriate Assessment, where required as a Competent
Authority, in accordance with Article 6 of the Habitats Directive; and shall only grant consent for developments RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 34 | P a g e
projects after having ascertained that such projects will not adversely affect the integrity of any Natura 2000
site.
HCLP 6 Protect, conserve and enhance natural heritage, insofar as practicable having regard to the remit of
the Council; including Natura 2000 sites (SPAs and SACs), proposed Natura Heritage Areas (pNHAs), other
designated sites, and non-designated areas of high nature conservation value known as locally important areas
which also serve as ‘Stepping Stones’ for the purposes of Article 10 of the Habitats Directive, improving the
ecological coherence of Natura 2000 sites.
HCLP 8 Any plan or project which is likely to impact on the conservation objectives of a Natura 2000 site shall
be screened for Appropriate Assessment (AA) and where pertinent, a Stage 2 Appropriate Assessment (Natura
Impact Statement) shall be undertaken in order to make a determination. Natura 2000 sites outside the County
and located within 15km of the Proposed Development site should also be screened for Appropriate
Assessment. A Natura Impact Statement shall incorporate a written statement which sets out mitigation
measures to prevent the risk of invasive species onto a Natura 2000 site.
The policies and objectfves outlined in the Monaghan County Development Plan 2025-2031 has been assessed prior
to undertaking the Appropriate Assessment of the Proposed Development on Natura 2000 sites. These have been
considered and applied to the assessment to ensure that the Proposed Development is compliant with the
requirements when assessing potentfal impacts on Natura 2000 Sites.
8.2 Planning Applicatfons
A search of the Monaghan County Council planning enquiry system (https://www.eplanning.ie), was carried out in April
2026. Finalised applicatfons lodged within the vicinity of the Proposed Development within the last 5 years were
examined. Planning applicatfons within the last 5 years in the locality of the Proposed Development site consisted
primarily of applicatfons for alteratfons and extensions to existfng buildings, along with the constructfon of a windfarm
development and other major projects (see Table 8.1).
Table 8.1: In-combination Assessment with regards to the Proposed Development.
File
Number
Applicatfon Status Decision
Code
Development
Address
Development Descriptfon
21149 Applicatfon finalised Conditfonal Dundrumman Td.,
Scotstown,
Co. Monaghan
Permission to construct 2 no. attached
agricultural buildings over existfng hardened
area previously used as a silage base, use
existfng agricultural entrance together with all
ancillary site works.
21243 Applicatfon finalised Conditfonal Dunddrumman Td.,
Scotstown,
Co. Monaghan
Permission to demolish existfng derelict two
storey dwellinghouse and ancillary outbuildings
and construct a new replacement two storey
dwellinghouse and detached domestfc garage,
install new mechanical eftfuent treatment
system, new mounded percolatfon area, develop
existfng domestfc entrance together with all
ancillary site works.
21433 Applicatfon finalised Conditfonal Dundrumman,
Scotstown,
Co Monaghan
Permission for the constructfon of a dormer
style detached dwelling, with a rear carport and
domestfc garage, a wastewater treatment
system with percolatfon area, domestfc site
entrance off an existfng lane and associated site
works. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 35 | P a g e
File
Number
Applicatfon Status Decision
Code
Development
Address
Development Descriptfon
21340 Applicatfon finalised Conditfonal Derryarrit,
Scotstown,
Co Monaghan
Permission to erect a two-storey dwelling house,
car port and domestfc garage insert a filter unit
and percolatfon area and exit onto public road
by way of existfng laneway.
21603 Applicatfon finalised Conditfonal Derryarrit ,
Scotstown,
Co. Monaghan
Permission for retentfon of a development
consistfng of 1) elevatfonal changes, 2) internal
alteratfons to accommodate 1st floor
accommodatfon 3) agricultural outbuilding to
keep horses (exempt development) 4) all
associated works.
318047
(ACP)
Approve with
Conditfons
Approve with
Conditfons
Killycronaghan,
Newbliss, County
Monaghan
Killycronaghan Closed Landfill Remediatfon
Project
322345
(ACP)
Grant permission with
conditfons
Grant
permission
with
conditfons
St. Patrick's Direct
Provision Centre,
Drumgoask,
Monaghan, H18
WT18
Contfnuatfon of permission for 54 residentfal
units with all associated works.
317882
(ACP)
Grant permission with
revised conditfons
Grant
permission
with revised
conditfons
10 Hillside ,
Monaghan , Co.
Monaghan
Constructfon of an apartment block comprising
6 apartment units and all associated site works.
322477
(ACP)
Grant permission with
revised conditfons
Grant
permission
with revised
conditfons
Killygowan,
Monaghan,
Co.Monaghan
Constructfon of 34 dwellings, vehicular and
pedestrian access, new connectfons to drainage
system and associated site works.
8.3 Summary of Cumulatfve Impact Assessment
There are a number of other Proposed Developments that have been submitted to the local planning authoritfes and
an Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP) for review. Any and all projects across three countfes that have the potentfal to result in
cumulatfve impacts in conjunctfon with this Proposed Development project were considered. As all of the approved
developments applicatfons have been assessed by the relevant authority, it can be assumed that the projects are not
resultfng in likely significant effects on any designated Natura 2000 Site(s). As it can be shown objectfvely that the
proposed project, will not have a likely significant effect on any Natura 2000 Site(s) it can be concluded that the
Proposed Development will not contribute to any possible cumulatfve effects when considered with the other
developments in the wider area.
In additfon, related projects are accompanied with Appropriate Assessment Statements, which will aim to identffy and
mitfgate potentfal impact sources to the relevant Natura 2000 Sites within the project Zone of Influence. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 36 | P a g e
All Proposed Developments considered in the Zone of Influence of the Proposed Development are subject to the
statutory planning process and where required are accompanied by the requisite planning and environmental
assessment documentatfon, including Appropriate Assessment.
Therefore, other projects, programmes and plans within the project zone of influence have been developed under the
consideratfon of potentfal impacts and effects to their receiving and surrounding environment and are tasked with
avoiding and minimising such impacts, through the Appropriate Assessment processes.
Provided adherence to the overarching policies and objectfves of the plans and programmes, best practfce and
mitfgatfon measures are implemented for individual projects, there is no potentfal for the mentfoned plans and projects
to have a cumulatfve impact to features of biodiversity interest, in combinatfon with the Proposed Development. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 37 | P a g e
Sectfon 9: NIS CONCLUSION
Artfcle 6 of the EU Habitats Directfve and Regulatfon 15 of the European Communitfes (Natural Habitats) Regulatfons
state that any plan or project that may, either alone or in combinatfon with other plans or projects, significantly affect
a Natura 2000 site, should be the subject of an AA. Cumulatfve impacts can occur when proposals have an impact that
combines with other plans or projects resultfng in a significant impact on a Natura 2000 site. The European Commission
Habitats Directfve and Habitats Regulatfons 2011 require that the impacts on Natura 2000 Sites be assessed for the
plan or project in questfon and in the presence of other plans and projects that could affect the same Natura 2000
sites.
Thus, as well as singular effects, cumulatfve effects were also considered in relatfon to the Proposed Development. The
AA Screening (See Section 4) found that the proposed project, in the absence of mitfgatfon measures and
incombinatfon with other unmitfgated works, could result on s ignificant impacts on the relevant Natura 2000 Sites.
Therefore, an NIS (presented in Section 5) was undertaken to ascertain whether the proposed works would have an
adverse effect on the integrity of Natura 2000 Sites within the project ZoI. The NIS concluded that assuming the correct
mitfgatfon procedures are followed, and other development projects have been appropriately assessed, then it can be
concluded that this Proposed Development will not result in significant negatfve impacts on the relevant Natura 2000
sites.
The proposed works have the potentfal to result in disturbance and displacement of Hen Harrier, this impactfng on the
Conservatfon Objectfves of the Slieve Beagh SPA. Best practfce and mitfgatfon measures (as outlined within Section 6)
have been identffied to ensure that potentfal disturbance effects are not released from the Proposed Development site
to the receiving and surrounding environment such that there will be no risk of adverse effects on the Qualifying
Features of Natura 2000 Sites within the project’s ZoI.
With the implementatfon of constructfon best practfce and mitfgatfon measures, there will be no significant effects
which would adversely affect the Qualifying Interests or Conservatfon Objectfves of the relevant Natura 2000 Sites
under consideratfon with regard to the favourable conservatfon conditfon of the considered habitats and species of
Qualifying Interest.
The provisions of Artfcle 6 of the ‘Habitats’ Directfve 92/43/EC (2000) defines integrity as the ‘coherence of th e sites
ecological structure and functfon, across its whole area, or the habitats, complex of habitats and/or populatfon of
species for which the site is classified’. It is clear that, given the applicatfon of prescribed protectfve measures for the
avoidance of impacts and the implementatfon of the required mitfgatfon measures, the proposed works will not give
rise to adverse effects on the integrity of any of the identffied Natura 2000 Sites evaluated herein.
It has been concluded that the development of the proposed project will not adversely affect the integrity of relevant
Natura 2000 Sites, and there is no reasonable scientffic doubt in relatfon to this conclusion. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 38 | P a g e
Sectfon 10: DECLARATION
It can be objectfvely concluded that, when the above mitfgatfon(s) are implemented, there will be no significant direct,
indirect or in-combinatfon effects on the Qualifying Interests of the Slieve Beagh SPA (004167), Hen Harrier (Circus
cyaneus).
Therefore, in keeping with Regulatfon 42(16) of the European Communitfes (Birds & Natural Habitats) Regulatfon 2011
(as amended) & based on objectfve informatfon, I/we declare that the project, either individually or in -combinatfon
with other plans or projects, will not adversely affect the integrity of any Natura 2000 Site.
I/We declare that this Natura Impact Statement accurately reports on the scientffic examinatfon of the project within
the context of any relevant Natura site(s), & on the findings of that scientffic examinatfon.
Author name(s): Signature: Date:
12/05/2026
Sara Sheridan
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 39 | P a g e
Sectfon 11: REFERENCES
Aughney, T., Roche, N. and Langton, S. (2022) Irish Bat Monitoring Programme 2018-2021. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No.
137. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Ireland.
Balmer, D.E., Gillings, S., Caffrey, B.J., Swann, R.L., Downie, I.S. & Fuller, R.J. (2013). Bird Atlas 2007-11: The breeding
and wintering birds of Britain and Ireland. BTO Books, Thetiord.
Burke, B., Lewis, L. J., Fitzgerald, N., Frost, T., Austfn, G. & Tierney, D. T. (2018) Estimates of waterbird numbers wintering
in Ireland, 2011/12 – 2015/16. Irish Birds. 11:1-12
BWI, (2023). Bird Sensetivity to Wind Energy Map Viewer. Accessed at https://maps.biodiversityireland.ie/Map.
Caravaggi, A., Irwin, S., Lusby, J., Ruddock, M., Mee, A., Nagle, T., O’Toole, L., O’Neill, S. & O’Halloran, J. (2020).
Anthropogenic pressures within the breeding range of the Hen Harrier Circus cyaneus in Ireland . Bird Study,
66(4), pp. 461-470. doi: 10.1080/00063657.2020.1725420
CIEEM, (2018) The Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal
and Marine. Version 1.2. Chartered Instftute of Ecology and Environmental Management, Hampshire, UK.
Cleave, A. (1995) Birds of Britain & Europe. Chancellor Press, Hong Kong.
DEHLG, (2010). Appropriate Assessment of Plans and Projects in Ireland Guidance for Planning Authorities.
Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government. Available at:
https://www.npws.ie/sites/default/files/publicatfons/pdf/NPWS_2009_AA_Guidance.pdf
EEA, (2022) Standard Data Form: Slieve Beagh SPA. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
EPA, (2023) EPA Maps. European Protectfon Agency. Available Online at: https://gis.epa.ie/EPAMaps/default
Everaert, J. (2014) Collision risk and micro-avoidance rates of birds with wind turbines in Flanders. Bird Study, 61:2, 220-
230, DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2014.894492
Fitzgerald, N., Burke, B. & Lewis, L. J. (2021) Irish Wetland Bird Survey: Results of waterbird monitoring in Ireland in
2016/17 and 2017/18. BirdWatch Ireland, Wicklow.
Fitter, R., Fitter, A., & Farrer, A. (1984) Grasses, sedges, rushes and ferns of Britain and Northern Europe. Harper Collins,
London.
Fossitt, J.A. (2000) A Guide to Habitats in Ireland. The Heritage Council, Kilkenny.
Gilbert, G., Stanbury, A. & Lewis, L. (2021) Birds of Conservation Concern in Ireland 4: 2020-2026. Irish Birds 43: 1-22.
HHP, (2021). Hen Harrier Monitoring Programme 2021 Report. The Hen Harrier Project, Galway, Ireland.
Hubbard, C.E. (1992) Grasses: A Guide to their Structure, Identification, Uses and Distribution in the British Isles. Penguin
Books, Middlesex.
Jermy, A.C., Chater, A.O. & David, R.W. (1982) Sedges of the British Isles. BSBI Handbook No. 1. Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland, London.
King, J.L., Marnell, F., Kingston, N., Rosell, R., Boylan, P., Caffrey, J.M., Fitzpatrick, Ú., Gargan, P.G., Kelly, F.L.,
O’Grady, M.F., Poole, R., Roche, W.K. & Cassidy, D. (2011) Ireland Red List No. 5: Amphibians, Reptiles & RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 40 | P a g e
Freshwater Fish. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Dublin,
Ireland.
Lundy, M. G., Aughney, T., Montgomery, W. I., & Roche, N. (2011) Landscape conservation for Irish bats & speciesspecific
roosting characteristics. Bat Conservatfon Ireland.
Marnell, F., Looney, D. & Lawton, C. (2019) Ireland Red List No. 12: Terrestrial Mammals. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife
Service, Department of the Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Dublin, Ireland.
Mc Guinness, S., Muldoon, C., Tierney, N., Cummins, S., Murray, A., Egan, S., & Crowe, O. (2015). Bird Sensitivity
Mapping for Wind Energy Developments and Associated Infrastructure in the Republic of Ireland. BirdWatch
Ireland, Kilcoole, Wicklow.
NBDC, (2023) Biodiversity Maps, Natfonal Biodiversity Data Centre. Available at:
https://maps.biodiversityireland.ie/Map
NPWS, (2012). Site Synopsis: Slieve Beagh SPA 004167. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts,
Heritage and the Gaeltacht.
NPWS, (2013). Site Synopsis: Kilroosky Lough Cluster SAC 001786. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of
Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs.
NPWS, (2016). Conservation Objectives: Slieve Beagh SPA 004167. Version 1. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service,
Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage.
NRA, (2005) Guidelines for the Crossing of Watercourses During the Construction of National Road Schemes. Natfonal
Road Authority, Dublin.
NRA, (2009) Guidelines for the Assessment of Ecological Impacts. Natfonal Roads Authority. Available Online at:
http://www.tfi.ie/technical-services/environment/planning/Guidelines-for-Assessment-of-
Ecologicalhttp://www.tfi.ie/technical-services/environment/planning/Guidelines-for-Assessment-of-
Ecological-Impacts-of-Natfonal-Road-Schemes.pdfImpacts-of-Natfonal-Road-Schemes.pdf.
Olsen, L. H. (2013) Tracks and Signs of the Animals and Birds of Britain and Europe. Princeton University Press,
Oxfordshire.
OPR, (2021) Appropriate Assessment Screening for Development Management. Office of the Planning Regulator.
Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Ireland.
Reid, N., Hayden, B., Lundy, M.G., Pietravalle, S., McDonald, R.A. & Montgomery, W.I. (2013) National Otter Survey of
Ireland 2010/12. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 76. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts,
Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Dublin, Ireland.
Ruddock, M., Mee, A., Lusby, J., Nagle, A., O’Neill, S. & O’Toole, L. (2016). The 2015 National Survey of Breeding Hen
Harrier in Ireland. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 93. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Arts,
Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland.
Ruddock, M. & Whitiield, D.P. (2007). A Review of Disturbance Distances in Selected Bird Species. A Report for the
Scottish Natural Heritage Council.
Scholefield D. & Stone A.C. (1995) Nutrient losses in runoff water following application of different fertiliser to grassland
cut for silage. Ag Env 55: 181–191. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Grenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 41 | P a g e
Smith, A. J. E. 2004. The Moss Flora of Britain & Ireland. 2nd Ed. Cambridge.
Smith, G.F., O’Donoghue, P., O’Hora, K. and Delaney, E. (2011) Best Practice Guidance for Habitat Survey and Mapping.
The Heritage Council, Kilkenny.
SNH, (2016a). Guidance: Assessing Connectivity with Special Protection Areas (SPAs). Version 3. Scottish Natural
Heritage.
SNH, (2016b). Guidance: Assessing the impact of small-scale wind energy proposals on the natural heritage. Version 3.
Scottish Natural Heritage.
SNH, (2017). Guidance: Recommended bird survey methods to inform impact assessment of onshore windfarms.
Version 2. Scottish Natural Heritage.
Stace, C. (1991) New flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press.
The Birds Directfve, (2009) Council Directive 2009/147/EC on the Conservation of wild birds. The European Union.
The Habitats Directfve, (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna
and flora. The European Union.
Webb, D. A., Parnell, J. and Doogue, D. (1996) An Irish Flora. Dundalgan Press, Dundalk.
Whitiield, D.P. and Madders, M. (2006) A Review of the Impacts of Wind Farms on Hen Harrier Circus Cyaneus and an
Estimation of Collision Avoidance Rates. Natural Research Informatfon Note 1 (revised). Natural Research Ltd,
Banchory, UK
Wilson, M.W., Fernandez-Bellon, D., Irwin, S. and O’Halloran, J. (2017). Hen Harrier Circus cyaneus population trends in
relation to wind farms. Bird Study. Vol 64, No. 1. Pg 20-29.
Wyse Jackson, M., FitzPatrick, Ú., Cole, E., Jebb, M., McFerran, D., Sheehy Skeffington, M. & Wright, M. (2016) Ireland
Red List No. 10: Vascular Plants. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage,
Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs, Dublin, Ireland. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 42 | Page
Sectfon 12: APPENDICES
Appendix 1. MAPS & FIGURES
Figure 12.1 Proposed Development site location map. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 43 | Page
Figure 12.2 Map of Natura 2000 sites within 15km of the site. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 2026
Natura Impact Statement 44 | Page
Figure 12.3 Soil profile of the proposed site and hinterland. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Figure 12.4: Bird Sensitivity to Wind Energy Mapping of proposed site (BWI,2023). RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 46 | Page
Appendix 2. ECOLOGICAL SURVEYS & INVESTIGATIONS
1. Introductfon
An ecological field survey was completed by Sara Sheridan MSc BSc, ecologist with Veon Ecology. A site investfgatfon
at the Proposed Development site located in Dundrumman, Scotstown, Co. Monaghan, was undertaken on the 6th of
July 2023 and the 30th April 2026, following best practfce guidance methodologies for multf -disciplinary walkover
surveys, as per the Natfonal Road Authority (NRA) (2008). Weather conditfons on the day of the survey were mild, with
heavy intermittent drizzle and a moderate breeze. The site visit was completed between the hours of 17:00 and 19:30.
The site was searched for evidence of Annex I habitats and Annex II species listed on the EU Habitats Directfve
(92/43/EEC). The site was also searched for the presence of invasive plant species listed in Part 1 of the Third Schedule
of S.I No. 477 of 2011, European Communitfes (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulatfons (2011). Findings of the surveys
were used to inform this NIS and are summarised below.
The purpose of the investfgatfon was to define the site in terms of conservatfon status, habitat type and general
compositfon, to identffy any Annex I habitats or Annex II species and to take cognisance of the fact that some Annex
species may not be present or easily observed, and as such should identffy if suitable habitat for the species is present.
It may then be assumed, using the precautfonary principle, that the species is potentfally present on the site. Note that
Annex I habitats may be defined using indicator species which may not be present at tfme of survey.
1.1 Objectfve
The Phase 1 Habitat Survey is conducted at early-stage planning and is the core element of a Preliminary Ecological
Appraisal. The survey determines whether there is a requirement for additfonal species-specific surveys. If such a
requirement exists, then an extended Phase 1/2 Habitat Survey will be conducted to encompass additfonal habitat
preservatfon and/or protected species. The primary objectfve of the phase 1 habitat survey is to record the biodiversity
and habitat types present within the site. This ecological report will be used to assess the sites potentfal habitat
suitability for the proposed project. This report gives a summary of the biodiversity and habitat types observed and
recorded during the walkover survey.
1.2 Phase One habitat Surveys
The survey identffied a variety of different Macro habitat types across the Proposed Development site, each supportfng
a variety of different flora and fauna species within them. This phase one habitat and ecological report has been
prepared in accordance with the current guidance (Heritage Council, 2011).
The purpose of the phase one habitat survey is to designate the site in terms of conservatfon status, habitat
classificatfon, and to identffy any potentfal Annex I habitats or Annex II species present on site and/or identffy the sites
suitability for Annex species. Through the applicatfon of the precautfonary principle, Annex I habitats may stfll be
defined using indicator species which may not be present at the tfme of sur veys. The results of the survey will inform
the subsequent relatfve reports.
The following research has been carried out to inform this report:
• Ecological data search
• Phase 1 habitat survey
• Site specific Habitat mapping
1.3 Survey Methodology
A phase 1 habitat survey was carried out to determine the types of vegetatfon present, species compositfon, their
extent, and locatfon. Site boundaries within and around the survey area were mapped and their structure (hedge,
drain, etc) recorded. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 47 | Page
The results of the survey are presented in accordance with the standard Phase 1 habitat survey format with habitat
descriptfons and mapping provided. In additfon, informatfon gathered relatfng to recorded species, habitat type and
structure are also presented in this report.
Desk study
An ecological data search for the survey site and the surrounding area was reviewed through the NBDC and biodiversity
Ireland. In additfon, aerial mapping and ordnance survey maps were reviewed to identffy any features of i nterest within
and surrounding the survey site (e.g., waterbodies).
Field surveys
The phase 1 habitat survey follows the methodology given in “Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey” (JNCC, 2003).
The vegetatfon communitfes and habitats present are described to level three using Fossitt (2000).
Faunal Surveys
Faunal species were recorded during the habitat survey, including inter alia; birds, mammals and amphibians, observed
or heard. Specific attentfon was also given to the presence of any protected or invasive species.
2. Site Overview
The project site is located at Dundrumman, Scotstown, Co. Monaghan. The Proposed Development site lies
approximately 4km east of the village of Scotstown, 11km northwest of Monaghan town and only 2km east of the
border between the Republic and Northern Ireland.
The area subject to the planning applicatfon is approximately 1.6 acres and lies within a field approximately 4.9 acres
which is under the control of applicant. The project site consists of improved agricultural grassland, grazed by cattle.
The surrounding area is predominantly improved agricultural land, with several residentfal dwellings and agricultural
buildings scattered across the landscape and some areas dominated by scrub. The Maghery stream (EPA code: 36M03)
is the nearest watercourse to the project site, flowing west to east approximately 150m west of the site boundary.
There are various other watercourse within 2km of the proposed site, however they are minor streams and are not
hydrologically connected to the Proposed Development site.
An unnamed local road runs along the western boundary of the proposed site which experiences a high level of traffic
from local residents and traffic associated with the local meat productfon facilitfes. The project site is owned and
managed by Connolly Meats Ltd., a local meat wholesale business. The company has various facilitfes and buildings on
adjacent lands including packaging facilitfes and agricultural sheds. The nearest private dwellings is situated directly
across the road from the Proposed Development to the southwest.
The Slieve Beagh Special Protectfon Area (SPA) (004167) is located approximately 1.9km north of the Proposed
Development site. The Slieve Beagh SPA’s Qualifying Interest (QI) for which it is designated is Hen Harrier (Circus
cyaneus) and covers upland areas of blanket bog, highly suitable breeding habitat for Hen Harrier. Other protected and
rare species such as Merlin (Falco columbarius) and Red Grouse (Lagopus lagopus hibernicus) have been identffied as
breeding within the Slieve Beagh SPA. The other EU designated site within 15km of the Proposed Development is the
Kilroosky Lough Cluster Special Area of Conservatfon (SAC) (001786), which is located approximately 11km southwest
of the subject site. The (QI’s) for this SAC include aquatfc habitats and White-clawed Crayfish (Austropotamobius
pallipes).
The Proposed Development site consists of improved agricultural grassland with hedgerows and treelines along the
site boundaries. The primary species of the improved agricultural grassland include a Perennial Rye -grass hybrid
(Lolium multiflorum x perenne), Yorkshire Fog (Holcus lanatus), Meadow Fox-tail (Alopecurus pratensis), Curled Dock
(Rumex crispus ssp.) and White-Clover (Trifolium repens). The hedgerow which follows the boundary parallel to the
public road consists primarily of Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna) with some Honeysuckle (Lonicera periclymenum)
and Cow Parsley (Anthriscus sylvestris). The hedgerows and treelines along the other boundaries of the site consist of RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 48 | Page
several species including Willow (Salix spp.), Ash (Fraxinus excelsior), Blackthorn (Prunus spinosa), Bramble (Rubus
fruticosus agg.) and Nettles (Urtica dioica).
3. Habitat & Vegetatfon Descriptfon
The habitats identffied within and in close proximity to the survey area are outlined below:
Linear woodland (WL)
• Hedgerows (WL1)
• Treelines (WL2)
• Improved grassland (GA)
• Improved agricultural grassland (GA1)
• Built land (BL)
• Buildings and Artfficial Surface (BL3)
The features of these habitats and associated micro-habitats are described below with their suitability for biodiversity
conservatfon within the context of the project. Photographs of the individual macro -habitats identffied within the
survey site are included in Appendix 3 for illustratfon purposes.
Improved Grassland (GA)
Improved Agricultural Grassland (GA1)
The Proposed Development site comprises of improved agricultural grassland habitats (GA1). At present, these habitats
support farming practfses and are managed for grazing livestock. On the day of the site survey cattle were grazing the
land. The ground within the grassland is poached in areas, partfcularly around the access point, feeders and along some
stretched of the boundary. The improved agricultural grassland habitat within the Proposed Development site is a
relatfvely species poor habitat and hots common species a Perennial Rye-grass hybrid (Lolium multiflorum x perenne),
Yorkshire Fog (Holcus lanatus), Meadow Fox-tail (Alopecurus pratensis), Curled Dock (Rumex crispus ssp.), White-Clover
(Trifolium repens), Pineappleweed (Matricaria discoidea), Foxglove (Digitalis purpurea) and Ribwort Plantain (Plantago
lanceolata).
Linear woodland (WL)
Hedgerows (WL1)
Hedgerow exists along the western boundary of the site which consist primarily of Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna)
and has been regularly cut, standing less than 2m high. Hedgerow is also mixed in with treelines along the other site
boundaries. These lengths of hedgerow consist additfonal species including Bramble (Rubus fruticosus agg.), Holly (Ilex
aquifolium) and Gorse (Ulex europaeus). Fencing made of barbed-wire and wooden posts follows the site boundary
and is mostly engulfed by the hedgerow.
Treelines (WL2)
Stretches of treelines can be found along the eastern and southern boundaries of the site, mixed with hedgerow at
tfmes. The treelines consist of species including Willow (Salix spp.), Ash (Fraxinus excelsior), Blackthorn (Prunus
spinosa), Gorse (Ulex europaeus), Holly (Ilex aquifolium) and Rowan (Sorbus aucuparia). The treelines are not very
mature, with a maximum height of approximately 6m. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 49 | Page
Built Land (BL)
Buildings and Artfficial Surface (BL3)
There are no buildings or artfficial surfaces within the site boundary, however there are several buildings and artfficial
surfaces within close proximity of the site. A residentfal dwelling with detached shed and garage is located on the
western side of the road, across from the southern corner of the project site. Multfple large agriculture buildings are
located north of the site, as well as an industrial wholesale building south of the site. A public road runs alon g the
western boundary of the development site.
4. Ecological Appraisal & Species Recorded
A multf-disciplinary ecological survey approach was taken during the walkover survey on the 6 th of July 2023, and
species of fauna observed were recorded, as well as any signs of fauna actfvity were noted . The walkover survey was
used to record the presence, or likely presence, of a range of protected species, including bats, non -volant mammals,
amphibians, and birds. Potentfal suitable habitats were investfgated for any signs of faunal presence. As part of this
report the relevant historic records from the Natfonal Biodiversity Data Centre (NBDC) will be accessed and the findings
included as part of the overall biodiversity summary of a site.
4.1 Volant & Non-Volant Mammals
Historic NBDC records for protected volant and non-volant mammals were reviewed within the 10km and 2km grid
squares surrounding the Proposed Development site and tabulated below in Further Appendices.
Bat Habitat Appraisal
The walkover survey of the site was carried out during daylight hours, during the summer season. Relevant features on
the site were visually assessed for potentfal foraging and roostfng habitats for bats. Trees on site were surveyed at
ground level through exterior inspectfons.
The NBDC 10km grid square ‘H531’, within which the site is located, recorded the following bat species: Daubenton's
Bat (Myotis daubentonii) and Natterer's Bat (Myotis nattereri) (NBDC, 2023). The overall suitability of the area for bat
actfvity is relatfvely low (27.11). The habitat suitability index for ‘All bats’ and for each individual species of bat is
presented below (See Table 12.1 below). The index ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 being most suitable for bats.
Table 12.1: Bat Suitability Index for the site and its surrounding area (NBDC, 2023).
Bat Landscape Suitability Index
Common Name Scientific Name Suitability Score
Soprano pipistrelle Pipistrellus pygmaeus 41
Brown long-eared bat Plecotus auritus 32
Common pipistrelle Pipistrellus pipistrellus 45
Lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros 2
Leisler's bat Nyctalus leisleri 39
Whiskered bat Myotis mystacinus 12
Daubenton's bat Myotis daubentonii 33
Nathusius' pipistrelle Pipistrellus nathusii 7
Natterer's bat Myotis nattereri 33
Total Suitability Score for All Bat Species 27.11 RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 50 | Page
Eurasian Badger (Meles meles)
Badger was a species recorded in the NBDC 10km ‘H53’ grid square and 2km ‘H53T’ grid square, the squares within
which the development site is located. The species was not observed on-site during the survey and no setts or dwellings
were noted on-site either. No identffiable Badger signs such as prints or latrines were identffied on -site, however some
trails through the hedgerows and treelines were recorded. These trails are signs of mammal actfvity on/through the
site, and it is possible that actfvity include Badger, but the species cannot be determined with certainty.
Otter (Lutra lutra)
Otter was recorded by the NBDC within the ‘H53’ 10km grid square, but not within the 2km grid square ‘H53T’. No
otter sightfngs or signs of Otter actfvity was recorded on-site. No suitable Otter habitat was identffied on-site or within
the area surrounding the site. It is very unlikely that Otter occurs on-site or in the area.
Other non-volant mammals
No other species of mammal or signs of mammals were identffied on-site during the survey. Species that have been
recorded by the NBDC ‘H53’ 10km grid square include Pine Marten (Martes martes), Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Irish
Stoat (Mustela erminea subsp. hibernica). None of these were recorded within the 2km grid square ‘H53T’. It is likely
however that Red Fox occur on-site and/or commute through the site as the species is common in agriculture
landscapes.
4.2 Amphibians & Reptfles
The Common Frog (Rana temporaria) was recorded in the 10km grid square surrounding the site. Historic NBDC records
show that no species of amphibian and reptfle have been recorded in the 2km square grid surrounding the
development site. During the walkover survey no incidental signs of amphibians or reptfles were recorded and very
little suitable amphibian or reptfle habitat was identffied in the area, and none was identffied on-site.
4.4 Birds/Avifauna
A variety of bird species were recorded flying over or within the Proposed Development area during the site visit (See
Table 12.2). The majority of the recorded bird species are green-listed and are common throughout Ireland. These
birds are typical of Irish farmlands and woodlands and are found in habitats typical of those present in the Proposed
Development area.
No Annex I bird species were recorded utflising the habitats within the site during field surveys. The habitats within
and surrounding the site are dominated by improved agricultural grassland and wet grassland habitats and may provide
supportfng habitat for Annex species. Protected birds recorded in the NBDC 10km grid squares which may utflise the
site, wider site, or adjacent habitats are listed below in Section 8: Further Appendices.
Table 12.2: Bird species observed and recorded during the phase 1 habitat survey site visit.
Bird species recorded during the Phase 1 Habitat Survey
Common Name Scientific Name Designations/Conservation Status
Black-billed Magpie Pica pica Green List
Common Blackbird Turdus merula Green List
Woodpigeon Columba palumbus Green List
Rook Corvus frugilegus Green List
Eurasian Jackdaw Corvus monedula Green List
Hooded Crow Corvus cornix Green List
Swallow Hirundo rustica Amber List RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 51 | Page
Bird species recorded during the Phase 1 Habitat Survey
Common Name Scientific Name Designations/Conservation Status
Robin Erithacus rubecula Green List
Goldfinch Carduelis carduelis Green List
House Sparrow Passer domesticus Amber List
5. Discussion & Conclusion
The Phase 1 habitat survey was conducted on the 6th of July 2023, following best practfce guidance methodologies for
multf-disciplinary walkover surveys, as per the Natfonal Road Authority (NRA) (2008). Weather conditfons on the day
of the survey were dry and bright with a moderate breeze, favourable conditfons.
The development site is comprised primarily of improved agricultural grassland (GA1), used for livestock grazing, with
hedgerows (WL1) and treelines (WL2) along the site boundaries. The nearest watercourse to the site is the Maghery
Stream (EPA code: 36M03), however there is no hydrological connectfvity between the site and the stream.
There are no Annex I habitats listed under the EU Habitats Directfve present within the site boundary. No botanical
species protected under the Flora (protectfon) Order (1999, as amended 2015), listed in the EU Habitats Directfve
(92/43/EEC), or listed in the Irish Red Data Books were recorded on the site. In additfon, no high impact inva sive plant
species (as listed by NBDC) were recorded during the site visits at the Proposed Development site. Likewise, there were
no plant species recorded on Third Schedule applying to non-natfve species subject to restrictfons under Regulatfons
49 of S.I. No. 477/2011 - European Communitfes (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulatfons 2011 within the Proposed
Development site or its immediate environs.
No evidence of protected Irish mammal or bird species under the Irish Wildlife Act 1976 -2018, were recorded during
the walkover survey. No habitat significant to protected bat species will be lost as part of the proposed project. The
site does host suitable habitat for aquatfc species of fauna.
The greater area surrounding the site hosts habitats significant to protected bird species, namely peatland and heath
which are key habitats for Hen Harrier, the QI for the Slieve Beagh SPA. However, majority of these habitats fall within
the area of the SPA and their protectfon is included in the SPA’s Conservatfon Objectfves.
With consideratfon of the precautfonary principle and taking into account the above informatfon set out in this report,
including recommended mitfgatfon measures, it can be concluded that the proposed project will not result in the loss
of ecologically significant habitats and/or species, and will not have significant effects on the receiving environment
and the Natura 2000 network.
7. Further References
Brooker, M. P. (1985). The Ecological Effects of Channelization. The Geographical Journal 151, 63- 69.
CIEEM, (2018). Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Terrestrial, Freshwater, Coastal and
Marine. Version 1.2. Chartered Instftute of Ecology and Environmental Management, Winchester.
Cleave, A. (1995). Birds of Britain & Europe. Chancellor Press, Hong Kong.
DAFM, (2019) Appropriate Assessment Procedure: Guidance Note & iFORIS SOP for DAFM Forestry Inspectors
(v.05Nov19) (DAFM, 2019).
DoEHLG, (2010) Appropriate Assessment of Plans & Projects in Ireland. Guidance for Planning Authorities. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 52 | Page
Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government. Available at:
www.npws.ie/sites/default/files/publicatfons/pdf/NPWS_2009_AA_Guidance.pdf
EC, (2002) Assessment of plans and projects significantly affecting Natura 2000 sites: Methodological guidance on the
provisions of Artfcle 6(3) and (4) of the Habitats Directfve 92/43/EEC. Office for Official Publicatfons of the
European Communitfes, Luxembourg.
EC, (2018) Managing Natura 2000 sites: the provisions of Article 6 of the habitat’s directive 92/43/EECA. European
Commission, Luxembourg: Office for official publicatfons of the European Communitfes.
EPA, (2023) Appropriate Assessment Tool. European Protectfon Agency. Available at:
https://gis.epa.ie/EPAMaps/AAGeoTool
Fossitt, J. A. (2000) A Guide to Habitats in Ireland. The Heritage Council, Kilkenny.
Gardiner, M. J. & Radford, T. (1980) Soil Associations of Ireland and Their Land Use Potential: Explanatory Bulletin to
Soil Map of Ireland. An Foras Taluntais, Dublin.
Hayden, T. & Harrington, R. (2000) Exploring Irish Mammals. Town House & Country House Ltd. Dublin.
Hubbard, C. E. (1992) Grasses: A Guide to their Structure, Identfficatfon, Uses and Distributfon in the Britfsh Isles
Lundy, M. G., Aughney, T., Montgomery, W. I., & Roche, N. (2011) Landscape conservation for Irish bats & speciesspecific
roosting characteristics. Bat Conservatfon Ireland.
Mc Guinness, S., Muldoon, C., Tierney, N., Cummins, S., Murray, A., Egan, S., & Crowe, O. (2015). Bird Sensitivity
Mapping for Wind Energy Developments and Associated Infrastructure in the Republic of Ireland. BirdWatch
Ireland, Kilcoole, Wicklow.
NBDC, (2023) Biodiversity Maps. Natfonal Biodiversity Data Centre. Available at:
https://maps.biodiversityireland.ie/Map.
NIFM, (2023). Flood Maps. Natfonal Indicatfve Fluvial Mapping. Office of Public Works, Ireland. Available at:
https://www.floodinfo.ie/map/floodmaps/#
NPWS, (2012). Site Synopsis: Slieve Beagh SPA 004167. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts,
Heritage and the Gaeltacht.
NPWS, (2013). Site Synopsis: Kilroosky Lough Cluster SAC 001786. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of
Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs.
NPWS, (2016). Conservation Objectives: Slieve Beagh SPA 004167. Version 1. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service,
Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage.
NRA, (2009) Guidelines for the Assessment of Ecological Impacts. Natfonal Roads Authority. Available Online at:
http://www.tfi.ie/technical-services/environment/planning/Guidelines-for-Assessment-of-
Ecologicalhttp://www.tfi.ie/technical-services/environment/planning/Guidelines-for-Assessment-of-
Ecological-Impacts-of-Natfonal-Road-Schemes.pdfImpacts-of-Natfonal-Road-Schemes.pdf.
Olsen, L. H. (2013) Tracks and Signs of the Animals and Birds of Britain and Europe. Princeton University Press,
Oxfordshire.
OSI, (2023) Geohive. Ordinance Survey Ireland, Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage. Available at:
https://webapps.geohive.ie/mapviewer/index.html RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 53 | Page
Reid, N., Hayden, B., Lundy, M.G., Pietravalle, S., McDonald, R.A. & Montgomery, W.I. (2013) National Otter Survey of
Ireland 2010/12. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 76. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts,
Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Dublin, Ireland.
Smith, G. F., O’Donoghue, P., O’Hora, K. & Delaney, E., (2011) Best Practice Guidance for Habitat Survey and Mapping.
The Heritage Council, Kilkenny.
Stace, C. A. (2010) New Flora of the British Isles. 3rd Editfon. Cambridge University Press.
Svensson, L., Mullarney, K. and Zetterstrom, D. (2022) Collins Bird Guide. 3rd Ed. Collins Publisher, London.
Wyse Jackson, M., FitzPatrick, Ú., Cole, E., Jebb, M., McFerran, D., Sheehy Skeffington, M. & Wright, M. (2016) Ireland
Red List No. 10: Vascular Plants. Natfonal Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage, Regional,
Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs, Dublin, Ireland.
8. Further Appendices (Biodiversity Data)
Table 12.3: Protected bird species recorded in 10km2 grid surrounding the site (NBDC, 2023).
Protected Bird species recorded in 10km2 in the last 20 years
Common & Scientific Name Designations/Conservation Status
Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Red List
Black-headed Gull (Larus ridibundus) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Red List
Common Coot (Fulica atra)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex II, Sectfon I Bird Species || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve >> Annex III, Sectfon II Bird
Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon
Common Grasshopper Warbler (Locustella
naevia)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Common Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Common Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex I Bird Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Common Linnet (Carduelis cannabina) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Common Pheasant (Phasianus colchicus)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex II, Sectfon I Bird Species || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve >> Annex III, Sectfon I Bird
Species
Common Pochard (Aythya ferina)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex II, Sectfon I Bird Species || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve >> Annex III, Sectfon II Bird
Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon
Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 54 | Page
Protected Bird species recorded in 10km2 in the last 20 years
Common & Scientific Name Designations/Conservation Status
Common Snipe (Gallinago gallinago)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex II, Sectfon I Bird Species || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve >> Annex III, Sectfon III
Bird Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species: Birds of
Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Common Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Common Swifl (Apus apus) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Common Tern (Sterna hirundo)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex I Bird Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Common Wood Pigeon (Columba palumbus)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex II, Sectfon I Bird Species || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve >> Annex III, Sectfon I Bird
Species
Eurasian Curlew (Numenius arquata)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex II, Sectfon II Bird Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern ||
Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Red List
Eurasian Teal (Anas crecca)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex II, Sectfon I Bird Species || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve >> Annex III, Sectfon II Bird
Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon
Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Eurasian Tree Sparrow (Passer montanus) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Eurasian Woodcock (Scolopax rusticola)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex II, Sectfon I Bird Species || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve >> Annex III, Sectfon III
Bird Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species: Birds of
Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Great Crested Grebe (Podiceps cristatus) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Hen Harrier (Circus cyaneus)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex I Bird Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Red List
House Martfn (Delichon urbicum) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 55 | Page
Protected Bird species recorded in 10km2 in the last 20 years
Common & Scientific Name Designations/Conservation Status
Lesser Black-backed Gull (Larus fuscus) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Little Grebe (Tachybaptus ruficollis) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex II, Sectfon I Bird Species || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve >> Annex III, Sectfon I Bird
Species
Merlin (Falco columbarius)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex I Bird Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Mew Gull (Larus canus) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Mute Swan (Cygnus olor) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Northern Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex II, Sectfon II Bird Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern ||
Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Red List
Red Grouse (Lagopus lagopus)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex II, Sectfon I Bird Species || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve >> Annex III, Sectfon I Bird
Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon
Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Red List
Sand Martfn (Riparia riparia) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Sky Lark (Alauda arvensis) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Spotted Flycatcher (Muscicapa striata) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Stock Pigeon (Columba oenas) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Tufled Duck (Aythya fuligula)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex II, Sectfon I Bird Species || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve >> Annex III, Sectfon II Bird
Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon
Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Water Rail (Rallus aquaticus) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Whooper Swan (Cygnus cygnus)
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts || Protected Species: EU Birds Directfve || Protected Species: EU Birds
Directfve >> Annex I Bird Species || Threatened Species: Birds of Conservatfon Concern || Threatened Species:
Birds of Conservatfon Concern >> Birds of Conservatfon Concern - Amber List
Table 12.4: Protected Mammal species recorded in 10km2 grid surrounding the site (NBDC, 2023). RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 56 | Page
Protected Mammal species recorded in 10km2 in the last 20 years
Common & Scientific Name Designations/Conservation Status
Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts
Eurasian Red Squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts
European Otter (Lutra lutra) Protected Species: EU Habitats Directfve || Protected Species: EU Habitats Directfve >> Annex II ||
Protected Species: EU Habitats Directfve >> Annex IV || Protected Species: Wildlife Acts
Pine Marten (Martes martes) Protected Species: EU Habitats Directfve || Protected Species: EU Habitats Directfve >> Annex V ||
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts
West European Hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts
Daubenton's Bat (Myotis daubentonii) Protected Species: EU Habitats Directfve || Protected Species: EU Habitats Directfve >> Annex IV ||
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts
Natterer's Bat (Myotis nattereri) Protected Species: EU Habitats Directfve || Protected Species: EU Habitats Directfve >> Annex IV ||
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts
Table 12.5: Protected amphibian species recorded in 10km2 grid surrounding the site (NBDC, 2023).
Protected Amphibian species recorded in 10km2 in the last 20 years
Common & Scientific Name Designations/Conservation Status
Common Frog (Rana temporaria) Protected Species: EU Habitats Directfve || Protected Species: EU Habitats Directfve >> Annex V ||
Protected Species: Wildlife Acts
Table 12.6: Protected mammal species recorded in 2km2 grid(s) surrounding the site (NBDC, 2023).
Protected Mammal species recorded in 2km2 in the last 20 years
Common Name/Scientific Name Designations/Conservation Status
Eurasian Badger (Meles meles) Protected Species: Wildlife Acts RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 57 | Page
Appendix 3. PHOTOGRAPHS
Photograph 12.1: Improved agricultural grassland (GA1) at proposed turbine location.
12.2 Hedgerows (WL1) along western boundary along public road (left). RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 58 | Page
Photograph 12.3: Hedgerow (WL1) and treeline (WL2) on the eastern site boundary. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 59 | Page
12.4 Hedgerow (WL1) and treeline (WL2) on the eastern site boundary.
Photograph 12.5: GA1, BL3, WL1 & WL2 surrounding the site (looking northwest). RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 60 | Page
12.6 Southwest corner of the site with BL3 & residential dwelling obscured by trees (right). RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 61 | Page
Photograph 12.7: Large agricultural buildings (BL3) northeast of the site. RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 62 | Page
Photograph 12.8 ESB substation location south of turbine on GA1 by industrial buildings (right).
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 63 | Page
Appendix 4. CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES
Slieve Beagh SPA (004167) RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 64 | Page
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 65 | Page
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026
Greenvolt Next Ireland May 202 6
Natura Impact Statement 66 | Page
RECEIVED: 26/05/2026