The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2572 - F.I. Received Doc.c ra tst u r I Q architecture Old Train Station North Road Monaghan Ireland t 1 +353 47 71568 e I info@craftstudio.ie w 1 www,craftstudio.ie 2th June 2026 Planning Office 1 Dublin street, Monaghan, Co. Monaghan H18 HF84 Project Ref: Tydavnet Community Creche Our Ref: 26-07 MON CO. PLT 1 0 JUN 2026 MONAcIHAN CO. COUNCIL PLAINING SECTION 10 J U €N 2026 FURTHER INFORMATION Re: Response to Further Information Request in relation to Tydavnet Community Creche Project at Mullanarockan, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan. Dear Sir/ Madam, On behalf of our clients, Tydavnet Community Creche, we wish to submit this Substantial Further Information/ Revised Plans submission for development at Mullanarockan, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan (Planning ref. 25/72). The development applied for consisted of permission to insert adapted prefabricated unit as temporary classrooms for proposed creche, connect to existing public sewer and exit on to public road by existing laneway an all associated works Revisions to the development comprise of: 1) Revised description of development as a 'Proposed temporary community childcare facility' 2) Amended site boundaries 3) Amended site layout to include revised location of the prefabricated units, revised vehicular and pedestrian access and egress configurations, and revised parking configuration. 4) updated surface and foul and surface water layouts The original application was submitted on behalf of the applicant by a different agent, Niall McKenna. Niall has provided a letter formally withdrawing interest in the project as agent/lead consultant which has already been submitted to the local authority. Craftstudio Architecture has been appointed as agent/lead consultant on the project. A letter of consent to agent has been included with the Further Information submission. Ronan Fitzpatrick MRIAI, M Arch, BA( Hons) Atch, BSc Arch Tcch Peter McGonagle RIBA, M Arch, BA (Hon) Arch, tered Architect PSDP itect Accredited In Accroditatlonconservatlon M:2026 G3 P In response to the recommendations and concerns raised by Monaghan County Council through the Further Information process, the proposed temporary childcare facility and associated site layout have been comprehensively redesigned. The revised proposal represents a significant evolution of the original scheme, with careful consideration given to site circulation, pedestrian safety, accessibility, parking provision, traffic management and the overall functionality of the development. The revised layout has been informed by detailed consultation with the relevant stakeholders and a thorough review of the issues identified by the Planning Authority. The proposed design seeks to provide a safe, accessible and well -organised environment for children, staff and visitors, while ensuring that the development integrates appropriately with the surrounding school, church and community facilities. Particular emphasis has been placed on achieving clear vehicular and pedestrian segregation, improving accessibility throughout the site and establishing a robust circulation strategy that minimises potential conflicts between users. It is considered that the revised design responds comprehensively to the matters raised in the Further Information request and achieves a high standard of site planning and design. The applicant is satisfied that the proposed development provides a safe, practical and sustainable childcare facility that will serve the needs of the local community while respecting the character and operational requirements of the surrounding area. The original Please find enclosed the following information to demonstrate compliance with the Further Information requirements: - Newspaper Notice - Site Notice of Significant Further Information / Revised Plans - Letter of consent to Agent - Letter from original agent withdrawing interest in the - Stage 1 Road Safety Audit by DBFL Consulting Engineers - Letter of Permission from Landowner - Letter from Alan Traynor Consulting Engineer in response to Fl - Engineers Services Report - Drawings - 00 GA 26-07 Proposed Site Location Plan (OS Map @ 1/1000) - 01 GA 26-07 Proposed Site Plan - 02 GA 26-07 Proposed Landscape plan - 03 GA 26-07 Proposed Ground Floor Plan - 04 GA 26-07 Proposed Section & Elevations - 05 GA 26-07 Proposed Site Section and Details - 26-106-100 Site Service Layout - 26-106-101 Site Service Layout — Longitudinal Sections - 26-05-33-01A Public Lighting Layout Public Lighting Specification Ronan Fitzpatrick MRIAI, MArch, BA (Hens) Arch, BSc Arch Tech Peter McGonigle RIBA, h1 Arch, BA (Hons) Arch, )VIO INJ G HJ, ? \ CO. C 5` M. N" PLANNING SECTION 18 JUN 2026 FU71THER INFORMIA: 'r; Registered Amhltoct pS.. Archllnct Arcrcdilad in Accrnditnllon conservation 2026 G3 P In addition to the submission of the above documents, I wish to further elaborate on the points raised in the Further Information request. 1. The application as submitted is considered insufficient in terms of road/traffic safety. In this regard the applicant is requested to submit the following information; a) A Stage 1 & 2 Road Safety Audit in accordance with TII Publications. The submitted audit shall assess the impact of the development in terms of road safety from the point of view of all road users' including drivers, motorcyclists, pedestrians, cyclists, etc. b) Revised drawings incorporating all design measures required to address any problems highlighted in the Stage 1& 2 Road Safety Audit. The applicant has engaged the services of DBFL Consulting Engineers to prepare a Stage 1 & 2 Road Safety Audit in accordance with the relevant Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) publications and standards. The findings and recommendations of the Road Safety Audit have informed the comprehensive redesign of the proposed access arrangements, internal road network, pedestrian infrastructure and car parking layout. In addition to addressing the specific matters raised by the Planning Authority, the revised site layout has been developed to incorporate the recommendations of DBFL Consulting Engineers with the objective of enhancing road safety, improving accessibility and reducing the potential for conflict between vehicles and pedestrians. Revised design drawings provide clear and legible circulation strategies for all site users and includes improvements to vehicular access, parking arrangements, pedestrian routes and traffic management measures. It is considered that these amendments significantly improve the overall functionality and safety of the development and ensure that the proposal accords with current and traffic M(iNAGHJ\N CO. engineering. i- Nlf•i)+f r: f•..,, r� ... 18 JUN 2026 2. The applicant is requested to submit the following information: (a) A revised site layout plan/cross section showing the proposed design leve{si4d widths of the extended carriageway and new footpath in relation to the existing chapel car park levels. The new footpath shall have a minimum width of 2.0m. (b) Plans indicating how any level differences or steep gradients between the new footpath and the chapel car park will be managed and mitigated. Ronan Fitzpatrick MRIAI, M Arch, BA (lions) Arch, Bk Arch Tech Peter McGonigle RIBA, MArch, BA(Hons) Arch, terml Ahitect PSDPtect Accredited In Accredilnllen IM2026 G3 P (c) Revised site layout detailing a disabled parking space with appropriate standards in terms of widths, gradient and accessibility. (d) Details of how it is proposed to enforce the Exit only arrangement onto the R186, as shown on the Site Layout Map. It should be noted that the existing right of way to the graveyard and adjoining agricultural land is accessible in both directions at this location. (e) Proposals to demonstrate how any potential conflicts with traffic associated with the development may have with established traffic accessing the graveyard, creche and agricultural land, and how it is proposed to maintain the informal car parking associated with the adjoining graveyard. (f) A revised site layout plan at a scale of 1:500, with section details provided at appropriate scales. Applicant shall illustrate on the revised site layout plan all necessary site work which would be required to be removed. In response to Item No. 2 of the Further Information request, the applicant has undertaken a comprehensive redesign of the proposed site layout, access arrangements and associated pedestrian infrastructure. The revised design represents a significant departure from the original proposal. Rather than relying upon existing parking and circulation arrangements associated with the church complex, the proposed temporary community childcare facility now benefits from its own dedicated parking, drop-off facilities, pedestrian infrastructure and internal circulation network. This approach significantly reduces the potential for conflict between different site users and provides a safer and more legible environment for children, parents, staff and visitors. The revised design incorporates a continuous pedestrian network designed in accordance with current accessibility standards. The primary pedestrian access to the creche facility is designed with a reduced gradient to the steeper access road in accordance with current best practice guidance relating to dimensions, gradients and pedestrian connectivity. Level changes between the proposed footpath network and adjacent lands have been carefully considered and are managed through appropriate grading, retaining features and accessible transitions as detailed on the Site Layout Plan and Landscaping Plan. Appropriate barriers will be provided where necessary. A dedicated accessible parking space has been incorporated within family parking spaces and an accessible drop -down area. MONAGHAN CO. COUNCIL PLANNING SECTION 10 J U % 2026 FURTHER INFORMATION Ropielared Architect Architect Accredited In conservallon Ronan Fitzpatrick M RIAI, M Arch, BA (Hons) Arch, BSc Arch Tech 2026 G3 Peter McGonigle RIBA, M Arch, BA (lions) Arch, NSop Acc,erlitatimt P Following a comprehensive review of the site access strategy, the revised proposal no longer relies upon a formal one-way circulation system or an "Exit Only" arrangement at the junction with the R186. The revised site layout has been designed to operate safely as a conventional two-way access arrangement, with appropriate road widths and internal circulation provided in accordance with the recommendations of the Stage 1 and Stage 2 Road Safety Audit undertaken by DBFL Consulting Engineers. It is acknowledged that during occasional periods of peak activity associated with church events, local traffic management practices may be informally adopted by users of the wider church grounds. However, these arrangements are not associated with, nor are they required for, the operation of the proposed temporary community childcare facility. Peak drop off and collection times at the creche will typically not overlap with church mass times. The revised site layout has been carefully designed to accommodate traffic associated with the proposed temporary community childcare facility while maintaining access to the graveyard, church facilities and adjoining agricultural lands. The informal parking area previously used by graveyard visitors has been incorporated into the proposed parking arrangement, providing a more organised and efficient use of the available space. Recognising the steep gradient between the graveyard and the main community car park, a new accessible footpath has been introduced to provide a safe pedestrian connection between these areas. Visitors to the graveyard can now utilize the main community car park in a safe manner or use the proposed creche parking outside of operational hours. Existing agricultural access has been retained and remains fully operational. The revised Site Layout Plan demonstrates the measures proposed to mamCan:exi$'�s ��IL while providing a safe and efficient arrangement for the operation of the hildcafCj1yJT`Tldr��Sti� identify the extent of site works required to facilitate the revised layout. 10 JUN 2026 '' PITHEf INP � O6�MATtn. 3. The applicant is requested to provide additional information demonstrating how the p_ roposecl eve satisfactorily complies with Section 15.24 Car Parking Standards and Table 15.5 Car Parking Standards of the Monaghan County Development Plan 2025 - 2031, The revised proposal has been designed to comply with the parking requirements set out in Section 15.24 and Table 15.6 of the Monaghan County Development Plan 2025-2031. The proposed development provides a total of 15 parking spaces within the childcare facility site. Of these, 14 spaces are allocated for use by the childcare facility, while 1 additional space is provided to replace an existing parking space lost from the adjoining community car park as a result of the proposed development. Ronan Fitzpatrick MRIAI, M Arch, BA (Hons) Arch, BSc Arch Tech Peter McGonagle RIBA, M Arch, BA (Hons) Arch, Hopietorod Architect PSDP Architect Accredited In Accrediletion Conservation 2026 G3 P In accordance with Table 15.6 of the Monaghan County Development Plan 2025-2031, childcare facilities are required to provide 1 parking space per 6 children and 1 parking space per staff member, in addition to circulation and set -down areas. The proposed parking provision has been designed to satisfy these requirements and is supplemented by a dedicated drop-off and pick-up area incorporated within the site layout. 4. The current proposal does not adequately demonstrate the provisions of appropriate vehicular circulation, pick up and set down facilities. The applicant shall clarify how compliance with an acceptable car parking and circulation arrangement will be managed and enforced within the site. The revised site layout incorporates a dedicated drop-off and pick-up area located immediately adjacent to the proposed childcare facility. This arrangement allows parents and guardians to safely set down and collect children without interfering with parking movements or through traffic within the site. The internal road layout has been designed around a one-way circulation system that provides clear, safe and efficient vehicle movement around the car park. Road markings and signage will ensure users are fully aware of the traffic system. The one-way system is supplemented by dedicated pedb �a$f ffi ffn ra> s � � defined parking areas, ensuring safe segregation between vehicular and pedest ian . J fl6R`11��99 Co' COUNCIL VINC SECTION 10 Jiity 2026 5. (a) The application as submitted is considered insufficient in terms of road/traffic sa �QTrON applicant is requested to submit the following The Planning Authority notes that part of the proposed development (steps and car parking space) are located outside the application site red line boundary. The applicant is requested to submit a revised site location map and site layout plan incorporating all aspects of the proposed development within the red outline of the application site. The applicant should note that where the revised details encroach on third -party lands, the relevant landowner consents (to make the application) must be provided. (b)Having regard to the above, the planning authority has concerns that the steps are not located in a safe and appropriate location given the vulnerability of the users involved. The applicant shall revise the location of the steps/ ramp to a safer location removed from traffic exiting the existing car park. Where this involves the loss of an existing car parking space within the Church car park, submit revised plans indicating a new space In lieu of the lost space included within the red outline of the application site, Ronan Fitzpatrick MRIAI, M Arch, BA(Hons) Arch, BSc Arch Tech Peter McGonagle RIBA, M Arch, BA(Hons) Arch, Hogietored ArchitectDAI.,.M�l Architect Accredited h'conservation2028 G3 The revised red line boundary has been amended to incorporate all elements of the proposed development, including pedestrian infrastructure, parking alterations and associated site works. Letters of consent from the relevant landowners were submitted with the original planning application and remain valid for the revised development proposals. Accordingly, all works proposed as part of this application are contained within lands subject to the necessary landowner permissions. The location and design of the pedestrian access arrangements have also been comprehensively reviewed. The previously proposed steps have been removed and replaced with an improved pedestrian connection that provides a safer and more accessible route between the existing community car park, graveyard and proposed childcare facility. This revised arrangement removes potential conflict points between pedestrians and vehicles exiting the car park and significantly improves accessibility throughout the site. In addition, the revised parking layout includes a replacement parking space to com church parking space affected by the proposed development, ensuring that the ovf wider community facilities is maintained. 6. The Planning Authority notes the proposed hardcore footpath linking the creche to the existing rlict m tiff In tbo. CO— ( J' �' PLANNING SECTION 10 JUN 2026 The applicant is requested to submit a revised design, providing a suitable pedestrian connection from proposed creche to the school entrance gates ensuring safe and direct pedestrian access. In response received directly from the Planning Authority, the proposed pedestrian connection between the childcare facility and St. Dympna's National School has been redesigned. The revised gravel footpath has been carefully aligned to respond to the existing site contours, allowing it to achieve accessible gradients throughout its length and provide a safe and convenient route for pedestrians. The proposed path forms the first phase of a wider pedestrian connection between the childcare facility and the school. The route has been positioned to facilitate future pedestrian links within the school grounds, which will connect directly to the existing school entrance and ensure a safe and legible route for children, parents and staff. 7. The application as submitted is considered insufficient in terms of the proposed lighting design. In this regard, the applicant is requested to: (a) Submit a Lighting Design Report for the development showing the junction and road connecting it to the existing public road taking into account the conflict area lighting requirements at the entrance with the Ronan Fitzpatrick MRIAI, M Arch, BA(Hons) Arch, BSc Arch Tech Peter McGonigle RIBA, M Arch, BA (Hons) Arch, MATIQN Repialomd Architect PSOP Architect Accredited in Accreditation Conservation 2026 G3 P public road, the footpath lighting requirements, the existing street lighting in place, the need to ensure uniformity of lighting, and minimisation of light spill into neighbouring private properties. (b) Include individual grid lighting reports for the whole project, the development only, the road connecting it to the development and the junction with the existing road, and new footpath to be constructed. The Lighting Design Report shall be carried out by a competent, qualified Lighting Designer. The applicant must liaise with Monaghan County Council's Public Lighting Officer regarding the specification of the existing street lighting in place. (c) Indicate all lighting columns placed on the inside/rear of footpaths to minimise physical obstruction to pedestrians and reduce risk of impact from vehicles and shall be placed in line with property boundaries or building lines. No lights, to be considered for future adoption by Monaghan County Council, shall be mounted on walls of any buildings. MON�,CHAN CO. COUNCIL (d) Indicate all lanterns accessible for maintenance purposes from hois parkP(,.p3pj� I lis g�dl.Jp�N situations where this is not possible, then collapsible columns, capable , f safe operation by one operator, shall be used. 10 JUN 2026 (e) Submit a planting layout drawing clearly indicating exclusion zones whe��Oi�r�e�t'ON will take place, i.e. there shall not be any mature tree within 6m horizontal distance o a " or within 8m horizontal distance of an 8m lighting column, etc. A comprehensive lighting plan has been prepared by VeeLite Lighting. The lighting design has been prepared having regard to the requirements of the Planning Authority and includes details of the proposed lighting layout, lighting levels, column locations, junction lighting, pedestrian route illumination and associated technical assessments. The design has been developed to provide a safe and secure environment for pedestrians and vehicles while minimizing light spill and impacts on the surrounding area. The Landscaping Plan provided for the site acknowledges the requirements for separation distances between lighting columns and proposed soft landscaping. 8. The proposed development is considered insufficient in terms of the environmental information provided. In this regard, the applicant is requested to submit: (a) Submit a completed Water Protection Plan checklist for the proposed development using the new Water Protection Checklist Plan as per the new County Development Plan 2025 - 2031. (b) Submit proposals for the storm water drainage system to take account of the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage guidance document on Nature -based solutions for the management of Ronan Fitzpatrick MRIAI, M Arch, BA(Hons) Arch, BSc Arch Tech Peter McGonigle RIBA, M Arch, BA (Mons) Arch, Ropietered Architect PBOP Architect Accredited In Ace editaAon ConcervaUon 2026JJJ G3 P rainwater and surface water run-off in urban areas. Proposal should include design details for a petrol interceptor for the car park area. (c) Submit a revised site layout plan clearly showing the following: (i)The storm water drainage system (in blue) and foul drainage (in red) (ii) Location of interceptor and/or any nature -based solutions (iii) The storm water outfalls (iv) Location of any watercourses within the vicinity of the site. Included in the Further Information submission is a Civil Engineering Design Package prepared by Alan Traynor Consulting Engineers detailing the proposed drainage infrastructure, surface water management measures and associated engineering works required to serve the development. The strategy for dealing with rainwater and surface water run-off includes Nature -based solutions and a petrol interceptor. In addition, a Water Protection Checklist prepared by Traynor Environmental has been completed and submitted. This assessment outlines the measures proposed to protect water quality during both the construction and operational phases of the development and demonstrates that the proposed works can be undertaken without adverse impact on surrounding watercourses, groundwater resources or the wider receiving environment. 9. The Planning Authority notes that no supporting statement has been submitted.ap .elation to the operation of the proposed development. In the interest of clarity and to allow for a fully inforn'r' • ist�eIQI?ar�hkr,ty requested to provide the following operational details; �� `,'Vt"..� S r= w IOPN (i) Proposed operating hours a JUN 226 (ii) Proposed number and ages range of children attending (iii) Proposed number of staff (iv) Proposal arrival and departure times of both children and staff (v) Clarification as to whether the type and size of the proposed developmenf intended use, particularly as there is such an important demand for childcar 4 Uiti,es in the local area. The proposed temporary community childcare facility will operate between the hours of 8:00am and 6:00pm, Monday to Friday. Initially, the facility is intended to accommodate up to 48 children, comprising a mix of pre- school and after -school age groups. However, the proposed building has been sized to facilitate growth in the short to medium. The facility will be staffed in accordance with all relevant Tusla requirements and applicable staff -to -child ratios. In this case there will be 5 staff to begin with. The proposed development has been designed to address a recognised shortage of childcare provision within Tydavnet and the surrounding area. The temporary facility represents the first phase of a wider strategy to establish a permanent community childcare facility on the site. The applicant has been advised that grant funding for a permanent childcare facility is contingent upon the successful operation of a temporary facility. Ronan Fitzpatrick MRIAI, M Arch, BA(Hons) Arch, B5c Arch Tech Peter McGonagle RIBA, M Arch, BA (Huns) Arch, Heylslmed Ar hltao PSDP Archilecl Accredited In AccredilMlon conservallon 2026 G3 P Accordingly, the proposed development is considered an essential first step in delivering a long-term childcare solution for the community, The scale of the proposed facility has been carefully considered having regard to the immediate childcare requirements of the area while also providing flexibility for future growth. Allowances have been incorporated into the site layout to facilitate the development of a permanent childcare facility with additional car parking at a later date, subject to the receipt of a separate grant of planning permission. High quality pedestrian connections are proposed between the creche building and existing community car park so it can be used in the short to medium term for allow the expansion of services to maximise the full area available within the temporary creche structure. While dedicated parking is provided for the childcare facility, peak drop-off and collection periods generally occur outside the principal periods of use associated with the adjoining church and community facilities. Furthermore, with the exception of staff parking, the majority of childcare -related parking spaces will remain unoccupied for much of the day following morning drop-off periods and prior to afternoon collection times. A significant advantage of the proposed location is its immediate proximity to St. Dympna's National School. The proposed pedestrian connection between the childcare facility and the school grounds will facilitate the direct movement of after -school children between both facilities, reducing the number of individual vehicle trips associated with collections and drop-offs and encouraging more sustainable travel patterns. It is therefore considered that the proposed temporary community childcare fa�ili,ty: i,S a} �tjcr�Pip lUsi�er a, �,,jIC'L meet current demand, while also establishing the foundations for the deliverof a pej-tnar�er�tlthlMt�fd�ili�;� that will provide a long-term benefit to the wider Tydavnet community. 10 J U N 2026 10, Applicant is required to submit revised plans which indicate details of exterfi�T' ii JMF'i�)ffMcATJP?ik, buildings. Plans, sections and elevations of the proposed temporary creche building have been provided including notes of proposed materials. 11. The Planning Authority notes that the proposed development description is currently described as 'proposed creche'. However, having reviewed all aspects of the development the Planning Authority considers this development to be inaccurate. The applicant is therefore requested to amend the description of development to read 'proposed temporary community childcare facility' Ronan Fitzpatrick MRIAI, M Arch, BA(Hons) Arch, BSc Arch Tech Peter McGonagle RIBA, M Arch, BA (Hons) Arch, Rngislorod Arehileot PSDP Architect Acerediled In Accredilalion conservation 2026 G3 P This would constitute Significant Further Information. In accordance with Article 35 of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 (as amended), the Applicant shall: (i) Revise the Site Notice indicating 'Significant Further Information/Revised Plans, as appropriate' (ii) Erect revised Site Notice on site (iii) Revise the Press Notice indicating 'Significant Further Information/Revised Plans, as appropriate' (iv) Submit a Copy of the Revised Site Notice and Revised Press Notice to the Planning Authority. The description of development has been amended from a "proposed creche" to a "Proposed Temporary Community Childcare Facility" in accordance with the requirements of the Further Information request. As this amendment constitutes Significant Further Information, the applicant has complied with the requirements of Article 35 of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 (as amended). A revised Site Notice and Newspaper Notice have been prepared and published reflecting the amended description of development and the revised proposals submitted as part of this Further Information response. Copies of the revised notices are enclosed with this submission. I trust the enclosed is in order, however if you require any additional information please don't hesitate to contact me. Mise le mpas, Francis Moran B Arch, BSci (Hoes) (Arch), MRIAI for Craftstudio Architecture Ronan Fitzpatrick MRIAI, M Arch, BA (Mons) Arch, BSc Arch Tech Peter McGonigle RIBA, M Arch, BA (Hons) Arch, 4K)INNAGHAN CO. U . PLANNING SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FI. fl ►'H R INFORMATION Ropist.—I A,el,Ann([Am.d11j.1I.n Architect Accredited Inconservation 2026 G3 28th May 2026 Mary McQuaid Chairperson Mullanarockan Tydavnet Co. Monaghan Re: Consent to Agent Dear Sir/ Madam, We hereby provide consent to Ronan Fitzpatrick in Craftstudio Architecture to act as our agent and to submit a planning application on our behalf. I trust the enclosed is in order, however if you require any further clarification please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours Respectfully, MONAGHAN CO. COUNCIL PLANNNG SFCT!ON 1 0 JUN 2026 Name "!_.!fTH%R IIVF©R�I�.T!Ot, To: The Committee of Tydavnet Community Childcare Project: Proposed Childcare Facility, Tydavnet Village, Co. Monaghan Planning Reference : Subject: Acknowledgement of Change of Professional Representation Dear Committee, We acknowledge your notification dated )-regarding the decision to appoint a new architect/engineer for the planning permission application and re -submission of the Tydavnet Community Childcare facility. By way of this letter, we confirm the following: • Withdrawal of Interest: We formally withdraw as the agents/lead consultants for this project effective from this date. • No Objection: We have no objection to a new firm or individual taking over the project, finalising the design, and submitting the planning application to Monaghan County Council. • Transfer of Rights: Upon settlement of our final invoice, we grant permission for the project to proceed using the existing surveys and preliminary work as a basis for the re -submission, subject to the new firm's professional indemnity and oversight. Yours sincerely, A \ c V Q wz MQ�.l.AC11AN �; 0.C0UNCIL I o �!� 2026 FU�fl II FORMA` ION Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit 260066-X-90-X-XXX- R P- D B F L -C E-0001 June 2026 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Engineering Sustainable Futures MONAO6 NCO. PLANNiN0 SEC I0 ��IL 10 JUN 2026 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit LJBFL L CONSULTING ENGINEERS ProjectTitle: Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan Document Title: Stage 1 Road Safety Audit File Ref: 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 Status: P1 - Information Rev: 1 S - Issued P1 0 23/04/26 First Issue Sayed Ahmad Saeed Thomas Jennings Thomas Jennings P1 1 02/06/26 Final Issue Sayed Ahmad Saeed Thomas Jennings Thomas Jennings Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the exclusive use of our Client and unless otherwise agreed in writing with DBFL Consulting Engineers no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of this document. The document has been compiled using the resources agreed with the Client and in accordance with the agreed scope of work. DBFL Consulting Engineers accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than for the purposes for which It was originally commissioned and prepared, including by any third party or use by others of opinions or data contained in this document. DBFL Consulting Engineers accepts no liability for any documents or Information supplied by others and contained within this report. It Is expressly stated that no independent verification of any documents or information supplied by others for this document has been made. DBFL Consulting Engineers has used reasonable skill, care and diligence in compiling this document and no warranty is provided as to the report's accuracy. Copyright The contents and format of this report are subject to copyright owned by DBFL Consulting Engineers unless that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or Is used by DBFL Consulting Engineers under licence. This report may not be copied or used for any purpose other than the intended purpose. 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Contents DBFL. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 ROAD SAFETY AUDIT SCOPE......................................................................................................... 5 1.3 REPORT STRUCTURE...................................................................................................................... 6 2 CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPOSALS.................................................................................................... 7 2.1 SCHEME DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................................. 7 3 ROAD SAFETY AUDIT CONTEXT........................................................................................................... 8 3.1 COLLISION HISTORY...................................................................................................................... 9 4 ITEMS RAISED DURING THIS STAGE 1 AUDIT.................................................................................. 10 4.1 PROBLEMS AT GENERAL LOCATIONS.......................................................................................10 Location(G1) - Lighting.....................................................................................................................10 Location(G2) - Drainage Design......................................................................................................10 Location (G3) - Traffic Circulation and Associated Road Marking and Signages .......................11 Location (G5) - Vehicle Manoeuvring.............................................................................................. 11 Location (G6) - Car Parking Bays.....................................MON4Gf AN.. Q 12 0�rNC'li::. PLANNING SFrTI,.w Location(G4) - Vehicle Access Route......................................................................................... 13 4.2 PROBLEMS AT SPECIFIC LOCATIONS ....................... .....1tWL.2Q26...................13 Location(S1) - Pedestrian Route to/from School.......................................................................13 F.I. lTFiIER 'NFORi iiA i IQN Location (S2) - Site Access/R1 82 Junction..........................14 Location (S3) - Pedestrian Steps......................................................................................................14 Location (S4) - Pedestrian Route to/from Existing Car Park.........................................................15 4.3 COMMENTS..................................................................................................................................16 Comment (Cl) - Design Information...................................................................................................16 Comment (C2) - Off -Site R182 / Local Access Junction..................................................................16 5 AUDIT TEAM STATEMENT..................................................................................................................18 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 ii Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit [:)BFL 5.1 AUDIT TEAM STATEMENT...........................................................................................................18 6 LIST OF INFORMATION RECEIVED....................................................................................................19 Appendix A: Problem Location Map.................................................................................................... A AppendixB: Feedback Form...................................................................................................................J Figures Figure1-1 Subject Site Location................................................................................................................ 4 Figure 1-2 Geographical Scope of the Road Safety Audit...................................................................... 5 Figure 2-1 Proposed Development Layout.............................................................................................. 7 Tables Table 6-1 Information Received as basis for the Road Safety Audit..................................................19 ',..•,_,i SI E TONt: W� I0 JUN 2026 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan 1.. Stage 1 Road Safety Audit CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND DBFL Consulting Engineers have been commissioned to undertake a Stage 1 Road Safety Audit (RSA) for the proposed Tydavnet Community Creche development on a green field site at Mullanarockan, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan. The general location of the subject site in relation to the surrounding road network is illustrated in Figure 1-1 below. Figure 1-1 Subject Site Location 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 4 Figure 1-2 Geographical Scope of the Road SafetyAudit Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co, Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit D B L CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1.2 ROAD SAFETY AUDIT SCOPE The geographical scope of this Stage 1 Road Safety Audit considers infrastructure including pedestrian/cyclist facilities within the extents of the subject site boundary and its immediate transitions with the adjoining infrastructure and lands. The geographical scope of this Road Safety Audit is illustrated in Figure 1-2. b0. CO'NICIL SECTION iN 2026 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 5 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan i C Stage 1 Road Safety Audit BFL._ CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1.3 REPORT STRUCTURE Section 2 introduces the principal characteristic of the proposed development. Section 3 discusses the purpose and context of the Road Safety Audit process. A summary of the Audit findings and associated recommendations are outlined in section 4 whereas Section 5 details the Audit Team Statement. Section 6 details a list of the information provided to the audit team for the purposes of the audit. 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 6 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan ��1 Stage 1 Road Safety Audit --. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2 CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPOSALS 2.1 SCHEME DESCRIPTION The development proposals include a Prefabricated Creche building, new car park, all associated site works and widening of a section of local vehicle access between the R186 and Tydavnet Cemetery as illustrated in Figure 2.1 below. (<1If '7!aa /.Tfl_ I a `1 [:tPla' GIIAN CO. COUNCIL Figure 2-1 Proposed Development Layout (Architects LaNNING SECTION 1 0 JUN 2026 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P11 ER INFORMATION June 2026 r� �0 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit 3 ROAD SAFETY AUDIT CONTEXT DBFL CONSULTING ENGINEERS This section describes the general context of the Stage 1 Road Safety Audit. The scope of the audit considers the subject development site and the immediate pedestrian/cycle/vehicular routes leading to/from the development site. The Audit Team membership was as follows: Team Leader: Thomas Jennings BEng MSc MIEI MIHT CMILT DBFL Consulting Engineers (Waterford) TII approval number: Ti 135381 Team Member: Sayed Ahmad Saeed BEng Tech BEng (Hons) MEng CEng MIEl Cert Comp RSA DBFL Consulting Engineers (Dublin) TII approval number: SS 3419515 The Audit comprised a desktop review of the information listed in Section 6 of this report in addition to an examination on -site of the existing local road network characteristics. The site visit was undertaken by both auditors together on Wednesday 8th April 2026 between 11:30 and 13:00. At the time of the site audit the weather was dry with all road/footway surfaces being noted as dry. This Audit has been carried out in accordance with the relevant sections of Transport Infrastructure Ireland guidance GE -STY -01024 May 2025 for Road Safety Audits. The Audit Team has examined only those issues within the proposed design relating to the road safety implications of the scheme and has therefore not examined or verified the compliance of the design to any other design criteria. The objective of the site visit was quantifying: • existing traffic (pedestrian, cyclist and vehicular) and travel demand cl • the provision of dedicated facilities availability for vulnerable road usE • the likely travel desire lines/links to/from the subject site, and • any issues that might impact the safety of non -motorised users (NMU '=.AC H4N CO. CC'iINCIL PLANNING SECTION 10 JUN 2026 F(r THER INFORMATION 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 8 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit DBFL CONSULTING ENGINEERS The problems identified and described in this report are considered by the Audit Team to require action in order to improve the safety of the Scheme and minimise accident occurrence. 3.1 COLLISION HISTORY The audit Team was not provided with historical road traffic collision data for the study area. The auditors checked the Road Safety Authority website and noted that access to Road Traffic Collision (RCT) data is not available at the moment. The Road Safety Authority website states the below. "We are in the process of reviewing our road traffic collision (RTC) data sharing policies and procedures. Record -level RTC data cannot be shared until this review is complete". 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan E:JBFL Stage 1 Road Safety Audit CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4 ITEMS RAISED DURING THIS STAGE 1 AUDIT 4.1 PROBLEMS AT GENERAL LOCATIONS Location (G1) - Lighting Problem: No details regarding the proposed schemes street lighting have been provided to the audit team. As a result, the audit team cannot comment upon the appropriateness of the proposed schemes street lighting strategy. Recommendation: It is recommended that appropriate level of illumination should be achieved across all pedestrian, cycle, and vehicle routes should these routes be used during night time conditions. The street lighting poles should be positioned as such that they do not present hazard to pedestrian and cyclists or reduce effective width of footpath. Location (G2) - Drainage Design Problem: No Drainage drawings were submitted for this audit. Therefore, the auditors are unclear if sufficient drainage will be achieved across the pedestrian, cycle and vehicle routes. Insufficient drainage could lead to ponding which could lead in pedestrian trips and falls, or vehicle and cyclists losing traction resulting in vehicle/cycle/pedestrian collision. Recommendation: It is recommended that at detailed design stage, ensure all pedestrian, cyclists and vehicle routes have adequate surface water drainage and ensure localised ponding does not arise during wet weather conditions. Also, gullies should be cycle -friendly and positioned as such that do not present hazard to pedestrians/cyclists. 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 10 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co, Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit DBFL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Location (G3) - Traffic Circulation and Associated Road Marking and Signages Problem: The auditors note that new car parking and set - down / collection area is proposed as part of the creche development. However, the layout proposals do not include any form of directional road markings or wayfinding road markings / signage to inform drivers of the appropriate / intended vehicle circulation strategy and •rrr•rrrrr••• • ::__,,___________ • � M associated arrangements. In absence of appropriate vehicle circulation and associated regulation road marking and signages, motorist may fail to stop/yield or suddenly stop to give a way to another vehicle. This could result in side impact, rear -end shunt type collisions or even head on vehicle collisions. Recommendation: It is recommended that a vehicle circulation arrangement is implemented with appropriate direction and STOP road marking and supporting signage provided to inform / direct road users. Location (G5) - Vehicle Manoeuvring Problem: The internal roads layout from the scheme drawings appears to have pinch point and relatively sharp bends that vehicle drivers are required to manoeuvre around, The auditors are unsure if all vehicles, particularly vans (LGV's), fire tender and / or waste lorries would be able to safely navigate and maneuverer the roads / car park layout when some or all of the parking bays are occupied. In absence of appropriate carriageway alignment and width, this is a risk of vehicle drivers overrunning the landscape/footpath/parking areas which may result in pedestrians being struck or side swipe/front-end collisions with other parked or moving vehicles. Recommendation: 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 11 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co, Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit DBFL. CONSULTING ENGINEERS It is recommended that a vehicle swept path analyses for the proposed car park and access road (and associated vehicle circulation strategy) should be undertaken to ensure the largest adopted design vehicle can safely and conveniently navigate the proposed internal roads / car park layout. Location (G6) — Car Parking Bays Problem: The scheme design incorporates a relatively short length of parallel aligned vehicle drop-off / collection area with circa 17 car parking spaces. The auditors are concerned that parents will be required to utilise one of the perpendicular car parking spaces when dropping / collecting young children to/from the creche building. With the exception of the disabled bay the car parking spaces seem to incorporate a standard size perpendicular car parking bay layouts. In instances when the vehicle drop-off / collection area is occupied, parents will be required to utilise the perpendicular car parking bays. When parked in the perpendicular car parking bays parents will experience difficulties when seeking to (open fully the door of their car and) access the rear of their parked vehicle (where the child will be located in a car seat) due to the proximity of a parked vehicle in an adjoining parking bay and the inability to open the car door fully or at least more then 300-400mm. The auditors are concerned that parents will be required to park indiscriminately in order to position their vehicle in a manner that permits them to fully access the rear seat of their vehicle. Such indiscriminate parking practices could result in vehicles overhanging / encroaching into the vehicle aisle and or adjoining car parking space. These practices could restrict access for other vehicle drivers and potentially increase the likelihood of a side swipe collisions with other vehicle drivers. Furthermore, if the parents utilise the perpendicular car parking bays located at the edge of the central back of car parking; theywill be required to stand in the aisle (with car door open) whilst seeking to unload / load their children from/into a rear car serd:ch )I�sta.ndig the vehicle aisle (whilst unloading / loading via the rear car door) parents (adchf1*4JUiLOEcT,oN susceptible to coming into conflict with moving vehicles or blocking the veh' le aisle. 0 J u°N v 2026 Recommendation: It is recommended that design of the car park is revisited to incorporat 'fE>�rJFIMATION parent friendly sized parking spaces. This could involve either (i) a longer length of parallel aligne 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 12 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co, Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit DBFL CONSULTING ENGINEERS drop-off / collection area, or (ii) the removal of a couple of car parking spaces to enable a buffer area (door zone) to be introduced between some (or all) of the perpendicular car parking bays. Location (G4) - Vehicle Access Route Problem: The proposals include widening the existing laneways carriageway to formally accommodate two- way vehicle flows. Whilst the proposals seem appropriate, in the absence of a specific measurement; the auditors seek confirmation that the proposed new width of carriageway is sufficient to accommodate two-way vehicle flows in accordance with DMURS for the projected modest levels (and type) of traffic that the scheme proposals are likely to generate. Recommendation: The extent of carriageway widening should be in accordance with DMURS guidance for the access routes indented local access function. 4.2 PROBLEMS AT SPECIFIC LOCATIONS Location (S1) - Pedestrian Route to/from School Problem: The scheme drawings indicate a north -south aligned pedestrian path extending from the creche building to the existing school grounds. It was noted during the site visit, that the alignment of the indicated path goes through the school playing pitch as outlined in red. The route of the path would require the removal of the grassed playing pitch in addition to risk of conflicts between pedestrians (parents/ children) and children using the pitch. Recommendation: If there is a desire to retain the grassed playing pitch it is recommended that the proposed pedestrian footpath be relocated / realigned to adjacent east -west tree line as shown with BLUE arrow or alternative route that safeguards the existing playing pitch provided. 260066-X•90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 13 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Location (S2) - Site Access/R182 Junction Problem: The auditors are concerned that the width of the vehicle aisle leading to / from the perpendicular car parking bays along the western side of the proposed car park may not be sufficient to accommodate the manoeuvring requirements of a vehicle. This could lead to collisions with other parked vehicles and / or drivers experience difficulties when entering / exiting this car parking spaces. Recommendation: DBFI_ CONSULTING ENGINEERS It is recommended that a aisle width of appropriate size is provided in reference to car parking design guidance for perpendicular car parking spaces. Location (S3) - Pedestrian Steps Problem: The lower level of the proposed new pedestrian route and associated steps 'lands' at the lower level in an area that might be utilised as a car parking space (not observed during site visit but noted on google maps). A car parked in this area x will block the new pedestrian route. + Recommendation: It is recommended that the lower level of the new pedestrian steps lead to/from a new footpath area at the lower level (eastern side) of the steps. This extended pedestrian area at the lower level should be self-regulating to discourage car parking in this area (BLUE). At detail design stage the details of the new steps should also explore the relationship between the new and existing steps (RED arrow) in this area to ensure that the new works do not restrict the existing RED pedestrian route. 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 14 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan IBFL Stage 1 Road Safety Audit CONSULTING ENGINEERS Location (S4) - Pedestrian Route to/from Existing Car Park Problem: There is the potential that some parents may choose to park in the existing church / nationa school car park and walk to the creche building e.g. a dual trip dropping or colleting children at both the existing national school and the proposed creche. The proposals include a new east -west aligned footpath parallel to the widened carriageway. For pedestrians traveling between the existing church car park and the proposed creche, there are required to walk (BLUR arrow) through the access / egress junction of the existing church car park. This could bring the pedestrians into conflict with moving vehicles. C r i I t jj -i Recommendation: It is recommended that opportunities are investigated that could deliver a dedicated pedestrian link between the existing church car park and the schemes new footpath that provides an alternative safe route for pedestrians negating the need to access the footpath via the church car parks junction with the local access road. PLANNING S'cTloNc.iL 10 JUN 2026 FU' ITI-iER INFORMATION 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1 _1 June 2026 15 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Location (S5) - Warning Tactile Paving Problem It is noted that there are proposed steps leading to/from the pedestrian crossing at the exisitng car park access. However, warning tactile paving has not been El D provided at the steps. A lack of appropriate warnning-\� tactile paving may cause visually impaired pedestrians to trip and fall. Recommendation: DBFL CONSULTING ENGINEERS It is recommended that at detial design stage appropriate warning tactile paving should be provided at at the top and bottom of the steps. Also, suitable handrails should be provided either side of the steps to assist pedestrains using the steps. 4.3 COMMENTS Comment (Cl) - Design Information The audit team have not been supplied with the following design information which the same should be provided at detailed design stage. • Drainage Design Drawing • Lighting Design Drawing • Signs and Road Marking Drawings • Auto Tracking Drawings Comment (C2) - Off -Site R182 / Local Access Junction The auditors note that the visibility for exiting vehicles from the site access road onto the R186 main road (looking northbound) seems to be partially obstructed by the protruded steps structure. This may lead to exiting vehicle drivers pulling out into the path of opposing southbound vehicles resulting in potential side swipe collisions. It is noted that this junction also serves as the exit route for the rear church / national school car park. This long established junction layout is located outside of the proposed creche developments immediate works area 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 16 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit DB L CONSULTING ENGINEERS however, the proposed creche may result in an increase in vehicle movements traveling two-way through this junction. It is recommended that the level of visibility splay between an exiting vehicle driver (positioned on the minor arm waiting to pull out and exit) and an approaching southbound vehicle traveling along the R1 86 towards the junction is established. If the visibility splay is found to be less than that Y - distance value recommended in DMURS (for the adopted design speed or establish 85th percentile speed of vehicle) then the local roads authority should be made aware of this potential deficiency. The local roads authority will be in a position to evaluate the layout and establish if traffic calming works on the R182 carriageway are required as part of the ongoing management of this section of the R1 82 corridor. 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 17 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan DBFL Stage 1 Road Safety Audit CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5 AUDIT TEAM STATEMENT 5.1 AUDIT TEAM STATEMENT I certify that I have examined the drawings and other information listed in Chapter 6. This Audit has been carried out with the sole purpose of identifying any features of the Design that could be removed or modified to improve the safety of the Scheme. The problems that I have identified have been noted in the report, together with suggestions for improvement which we recommend should be studied for implementation. The audit has been carried out by the persons named below who have been independent of the scheme Design Team. Audit Team Leader: Mr. Thomas Jennings BEngTech BEng MSc MIEI MIHT CMILT DBFL Consulting Engineers (Waterford) Signed: ,��1�11tia Date: 02.06.2026 Audit Team Member: Mr. Sayed Ahmad Saeed BEngTech BEng (Hons) MEng CEng MIEI Cert Comp RSA DBFL Consulting Engineers (Dublin) Signed: Date: 02.06.2026 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1 _1 June 2026 18 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit 6 LIST OF INFORMATION RECEIVED DB L CONSULTING ENGINEERS Table 6-1 Information Received as basis for the Road Safety Audit 1 Scheme Description Yes In email 2 Project Brief No 3 Scheme / Project • 26-07 00 Site Plan Yes Drawings • 26-07 01 Site Location Plan 4 Departures from No Standard 5 Traffic Signal Information No 6 Road Signs & Road No Marking Details 7 Traffic Count Information No 8 Speed Survey Data No 9 Collision Data No 10 Previous Road Safety No Audit Reports 11 Relevant Design No Standards 12 Public Transport No Information 13 Other Information No M0NA,r,1.1j,N , PLANNiNG SECTI0N�IL 1 0 JU:J 2026 FL1 TFIFR INFORMATION 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_1 June 2026 19 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co, Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1 _0 June 2026 DBFL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Appendix A: Problem Location hV8 p Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan Stage 1 Road Safety Audit DB L CONSULTING ENGINEERS 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_0 June 2026 Creche Development, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan ❑BFL Stage 1 Road Safety Audit CONSULTING ENGINEERS Appendix B : Feedback Form PLrG 10 :" 2020 260066-X-90-X-XXX-RP-DBFL-CE-0001 P1_0 June 2026 A 2 2 WCdO LL 0 w ± 0. X O m tb �n 0 P N • ii c f0 1 Ion ij h II c 42 u 4 4 MONAGHAN CO. PLANNING SECTION COUNCIL ECTION 10JU►N 2026 F ITHER INFORMATION Engineering Sustainable Futures Dublin Office Cork Office Galway Office Waterford Office Ormond House 14 South Mall Upper Ormond Quay Cork, Ireland Dublin 7, Ireland T12 CT91 D07 W704 Odeon House 7 Eyre Square Galway, Ireland H91 YNC8 Suite 8b The Atrium Maritana Gate, Canada St Waterford, Ireland X91 W028 + 353 1 400 4000 + 353 21 202 4538 + 353 91 33 55 99 + 353 51 309 500 OBFLinfo@dbfl.ie info@dbfl.ie info@dbfl.ie info@dbfl.ie CONSULTING ENGINEERS www.dbfl.ie www.dbfl.ie www.dbfl.ie www.dbfl.le /' Ill/'// UU /,, %' ) I) I I 1' /.' /' 2 March 2026 Planning Offices, Monaghan County Council, 1 Dublin Street, Monaghan. H 18 X982. 'I't ) \Vhom It NIaConcern, MONAGHAN CO. CCSJNCIL PLANNING SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FURTHER INFORMATION Re: Proposed Works Adjacent to "Gra\ e\ard Lane" — I da's net Community Childcare I \V rite in relation Li) the proposal by Tydavnet Community Childcare to redevelop a strip (ii land approximately t\vo (2) metres in width adjacent to "Graveyard Lane," 's's hich will partially extend into the c,,\isting car park area. The proposed Works include: • "I'hc rcho�itioning of the existing entrance steps adjacent to the Church entrance, • The positioning of a pedestrian crossing at the current car park entrance. • 'I'hc removal of the c\istin`-, ditch boundary. • The widening of the existing roadway. • The construction of a (me ( I1 metre Wide I'oitpath along the t'ev iscd houndarN. • file development of'a new pedestrian entrance at the boundarA het's'scell the childcare facility and St. Dympna's National School. Approval for these works has been granted h) St. Macartun's Diocesan Trust. In illy rapacity as Parish Priest and Trustee. I confirm ills agreement with the proposed development. This approval is `ranted on the understanding that the Parish's financial obligations in respect of the final costs associated 'sv ith boundary restoration will be agreed ill ad'sance with the Tydavnet Conlnlunit' Childcare Development Committee. Yours faithfully, Stephen Joyce Pirc,i hial Hot.tse, ,trarunni'm, ottstown, C). Ms;nac,h,,n. H 18X60 'Jdavnet®'_lc.tuh' rparishes.ie s I or Belturbet Business Park st Belturbet 8 Co. Cavan AY53 H14AY94 is +353 49 9522236 +353 1 6750850 1: 1fl10@81a07 orn c: dublin@atantraynor.com W: W 'alantraynoccorr W. www.atantraynorcom Our p5.163 PlanDepartment, Moan County Council Col I I Offices, Thi l en, Mnaghan, Ca, Monaghan. 02nd June 2026 Re: Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended). Planning and Development Regulations 2001 (as amended). Alan Traynor Consulting Engineers Ltd. MONQ� y c` PLANNING 0a CL) J,NCIL "S CTION '0JUN2026 �v'►�r�E� INS '��MAr1ON 25/72 - permission to insert adapted prefabricated unit as temporary classrooms for proposed creche, connect to existing public sewer and exit on to public road by existing laneway and all associated works at Mullanarockan Tydavnet Co. Monaghan. Planning Ref: D26A/0055/WEB Dear Sir/Madam, In relation to Item 8 of the Further Information Request for the above planning permission please see below clarification and accompanying documentation. 8(a). Submit a completed Water Protection Plan checklist for the proposed development using the new Water Protection Checklist Plan as per the new County Development Plan 2025 - 2031. Please see water protection checklist enclosed within the attached Engineering Services Report. 8(b). Submit proposals for the storm water drainage system to take account of the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage guidance document on Nature -based solutions for the management of rainwater and surface water run-off in urban areas. Proposal should include design details for a petrol interceptor for the car park area. It is proposed to use permeable paving, filter drains, downpipes, and a suitably sized network to collect all run-off from the proposed hardstand/roof areas in accordance with the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage guidance document on Nature -based solutions for the management of rainwater and surface water run-off in urban areas. The surface water will be discharged to an existing storm manhole located to the southeast of the site. The discharge from the proposed development will be restricted to maximum value of 5.7 I/s by means of a hydro brake located in the first surface water manhole upstream of the discharge manhole. The Q -bar value was calculated using the UKsuds website. MTIVO ^,MTIVO AMTIVO D 14001 I5O 45001 ISO 9001 trtifled Certified wonn,en^ai Certified ngemr t Ovupa.�onal lleslthA Sally Man+gemml Q��Y Management Civil I Structural I Environmental I Surveying VAT NO.: 6348099Q Alan Traynor Consulting Engineers Limited, Registered No. 328099. Managing Director: Directors: Liam McElgunn, Cert Civ. Eng., M EI,lTraynor, Pauric Loughlin,B. Sc. (Hons), ACABE, Calm Baxter, B. Eng., MIEI IL veying 3480990 328099. .ng., MIEt. ing., MIEI Alan Traynor Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Site Description...................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Surface Water Drainage........................................................................................................3 2.1 Surface Water Drainage - Existing.........................................................................................3 2.2 Surface Water Drainage — Proposed.....................................................................................3 3.0 Foul Drainage......................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Foul Drainage — Existing......................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Foul Drainage —Proposed...................................................................................................... 5 Appendix A - Surface Water Calculations Appendix B - Permeable Paving, Hydrobrake, Petrol Interceptor & Attenuation Tank details. Appendix C - Foul Water Calculations MONAGHAN CO. COUNCIL PLANNING SECTION 1 0 JUN 2026 FWITHER INFORMATION 1 A Alan Traynor 1.0 Introduction Alan Traynor Consulting Engineers Ltd have been engaged by Monaghan County Council to carry out engineering services design for the proposed development at Tydavnet Creche, Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan. This report addresses the foul and surface water drainage and water supply for this application. 1.1 Site Description The site has an area of 0.586 hectares and is located along the R186 Road in Tydavnet, Co. Monaghan. The site is a greenfield site with no existing buildings. Tedavnet Cemetery is located to the south of the site, St. Dympna's is located to the east and agricultural land to the west and north. The site can be accessed via an access road to the southeast just off the R186 which is located to the west of the site. UN PLANMNC{ v S 'C O®N�.;� 0 JUN 2026 FU THER ►' FORMATI , Alan Traynor 2.0 Surface Water Drainage 2.1 Surface Water Drainage - Existing The site is a green field site and as such there is no existing surface water drainage infrastructure on the site. There is an existing surface water sewer running in the R186 Main Road. 2.2 Surface Water Drainage — Proposed It is proposed to use permeable paving, gullies, filter drains, downpipes, and a suitably sized network to collect all run-off from the proposed hardstand/roof areas. The surface water will be discharged to an existing storm manhole located to the southeast of the site. The discharge from the proposed development will be restricted to maximum value of 5.7 I/s by means of a hydro brake located in the first surface water manhole upstream of the discharge manhole. The 0 -bar value was calculated using the UKsuds website. When the discharge restriction is exceeded, all excess water will be attenuated in a new stormtech attenuation tank, located at the entrance of the site, with a minimum capacity of 18.64m3. The attenuation tank has been sized to cater for a 1 in 100 -year storm event with an additional 20% capacity for climate change. The surface water runoff will pass through a petrol interceptor prior to being discharged from the site. Please refer to Drawing 26-106-100 for the surface water sewer layout, Drawing 26-106-101 for the surface water sewer longitudinal sections, Appendix A for the surface water calculations, Appendix B for the permeable paving, hydrobrake, petrol interceptor & attenuation tank details and appendix D for the Water Protection Plan Checklist. -- - ------------------ - MONAGHAN CO. COUNCIL PLANNING SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FU. THER INFORMATION 3 Alan Traynof 2.3 SuDS Design Introduction The following surface water drainage review has been prepared to demonstrate the use of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems to adequately manage rainfall runoff from the development. The proposed surface water design will be in compliance with the SuDS Manual Ciria Report 753 and the SuDS design elements in the development were selected from The Four Pillars of SuDS. Figure 1 — The Four Pillars of SuDS (Ref — CIRIA Report C753) MONAGHAN CO. COUNCIL PLANNING SECTION 1 0 JUN 2026 FURTHER INFORMATION Alan Traynor 2.4 SuDS Treatment Train Selection for Development In accordance with SuDS Manual Ciria Report 753, the following SuDS elements were chosen: Permeable Paving — The car parking spaces for all the residential units will be constructed using permeable paving. Permeable paving systems will reduce peak discharges into the drainage system and treat run off by providing a 70-90% removal efficiency rate for hydrocarbons and 60-95% removal of suspended solids thereby improving the quality of water being discharged. Filter Drains — Access Road will drain into shallow trenches filled with stone/gravel which will provide attenuation and initial treatment of the runoff before conveying it to the main surface water sewer or other SuDS features. Attenuation and Flow Control — As mentioned in section 2.2 previously, it is proposed to construct an attenuation storage tank within the development. The attenuation tank will be required when the surface water runoff exceeds predevelopment levels. All SUDS elements have been sized to cater for a 1 in 100 -year storm event with an additional 20% allowance for climate change. The surface water will also pass through a bypass interceptor prior to being discharged. Please refer to Appendix A for the surface water calculations and report and Appendix B for the permeable paving, hydrobrake, petrol interceptor & attenuation tank details. 3.0 Foul Drainage 3.1 Foul Drainage - Existing There is an existing foul water sewer running in the R186 Main Road. 3.2 Foul Drainage — Proposed The foul water from the site will be collected using a suitably sized gravity sewer network and discharged to the existing foul sewer running in the R186 Main Road to the east of the site. Please refer to Drawing 26-106-100 for the foul water sewer layout, Drawing 26-106-101 for the foul water sewer longitudinal sections, Appendix C for the foul water calculations. MONAGHAN CO. COUNCIL PLANNING SECTION 10 J U N 2026 FURTHER INFORMATION Appendix A - Surface Water Calculations MONAGHAN CO. COUNCIL PLANNING SECTION 1 0 JUN 2026 FURTHER INFORMATION Alan Traynor Consulting I File: Flow Rev B.pfd I Page 1 Network: Storm Network 14� Causeway Liam McElgunn 4 20/05/2026 Design Settings Rainfall Methodology Return Period (years) Additional Flow (%) FSR Region M5-60 (mm) Ratio -R CV Time of Entry (mins) FSR 100 0 England and Wales 15.800 0.249 0.750 5.00 Name Area T of E Cover (ha) (mins) Level (m) Si 0.049 H 101.650 S2 0.104 `H 102.500 Maximum Time of Concentration (mins) 30.00 Maximum Rainfall (mm/hr) 50.0 Minimum Velocity (m/s) 0.71 Connection Type Le ' flits Minimum Backdrop Height (m) Preferred Cover Depth (m) 200 Include Intermediate Ground Enforce best practice design rul/ J Nodes 1O4/4,coNC Diameter Easting North! �� pth 0?6+ (mm) (m) (m) 1200 1105009.250 525831 830 1.425 1200 1105013.756 525814.261 2.396 ,�'/•C�� S3 99.500 1200 1105068.304 525814.485 1.530 Sext 99.420 1200 1105069.189 525820.953 1.950 Atten Tank H 99.500 1105066.875 525811.672 1.514 Links Name US DS Length ks (mm) / US IL DS IL Fall Slope Dia T of C Rain Node Node (m) n (m) (m) (m) (1:X) (mm) (mins) (mm/hr) 1.000 Si S2 O1. i:;; 0.600 100.225 100.104 0.121 150.0 225 5.28 50.0 1.001 S2 S3 54.548 0.600 100.104 97.970 2.134 25.6 225 5.63 50.0 2.000 Atten Tank S3 3.155 0.600 97.986 97.970 0.016 197.2 225 5.06 50.0 1.002 S3 Sext 6.528 0.600 97.970 97.470 0.500 13.1 225 5.66 50.0 Name Vel Cap Flow US DS F Area E Add Pro Pro (m/s) (Its) (I/s) Depth Depth (ha) Inflow Depth Velocity (m) (m) (I/s) (mm) (m/s) 1.000 1.065 42.3 6.6 1.200 2.171 0.049 0.0 60 0.781 1.001 2.598 103.3 20.7 2.171 1.305 0.153 0.0 68 2.042 2.000 0.927 36.9 0.0 1.289 1.305 0.000 0.0 0 0.000 1.002 J.C i 144.7 20.7 1.305 1.725 0.153 0.0 58 2.612 Pipeline Schedule Link Length Slope Dia Link US CL US IL US Depth DS CL DS IL DS Depth (m) (1:X) (mm) Type (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) 1.000 18.138 150.0 225 Circular 101.650 i i' ; , 1.200 102,500 H) i ) ! 2.171 1.001 54.548 25.6 225 Circular 102.500 100.104 2.171 99.500 97.970 1.305 2.000 3.155 197.2 225 Circular 99.500 97.986 1.289 99.500 97.970 1.305 1.002 6.528 13.1 225 Circular 99.500 97.970 1.305 99.420 97.470 1.725 Link US Dia Node MH DS Dia Node MH Node (mm) Type Type Node (mm) Type Type 1.000 Si 1200 Manhole Adoptable S2 1200 Manhole Adoptable 1.001 S2 1200 Manhole Adoptable S3 1200 Manhole Adoptable 2.000 Atten Tank Junction S3 1200 Manhole Adoptable 1.002 S3 1200 Manhole Adoptable Sext 1200 Manhole Adoptable I Flow+ v14.0 Coovright © 1988-2026 Causeway Technologies Ltd I Alan Traynor Consulting I File: Flow Rev B.pfd I Page 2 Causeway Network: Storm Network Liam McElgunn 20/05/2026 Simulation Settings Rainfall Methodology Rainfall Events FSR Region M5-60 (mm) Ratio -R Summer CV Winter CV Analysis Speed Skip Steady State Drain Down Time (mins) FSR Singular Scotland and Ireland 15,800 0.249 0.750 0.840 Normal x 240 Additional Storage (m3/ha) 20.0 Starting Level (m) Check Discharge Rate(s) ✓ 1 year (I/s) 1.0 10 year (I/s) 1.6 30 year (I/s) 1.9 100 year (I/s) 2.3 Check Discharge Volume ✓ 100 year 360 minute (m3) Storm Durations 15 30 60 120 180 240 360 480 600 720 Return Period Climate Change Additional Area Additional F (years) (CC %) (A %) (Q%) 1 20 0 10 20 0 30 20 0 100 20 0 Pre -development Discharge Rate Site Makeup Greenfield Greenfield Method IH124 Positively Drained Area (ha) 0.118 SAAR (mm) 1021 Soil Index 5 SPR 0.53 Region 11 Growth Factor 1 year 0.83 Growth Factor 10 year 1.37 960 1440 I ,IG IAGHA�N CO. CoU 'CIL PLANNING S Ci, 0 0 0 ,0�UN2026 0 Growth Factor 30 year 1.65 Growth Factor 100 year 1.96 Betterment (%) 0 QBar 1.2 Q 1 year (1/s) 1.0 Q 10 year (I/s) 1.6 Q 30 year (I/s) 1.9 Q 100 year (I/s) 2.3 Pre -development Discharge Volume Site Makeup Greenfield Method Positively Drained Area (ha) Soil Index SPR CWI Greenfield FSR/FEH 0.118 5 0.53 Return Period (years) 100 Climate Change (%) 0 Storm Duration (mins) 360 Betterment (%) 0 PR Runoff Volume (m3) Node S3 Online Hydro -Brake® Control Flap Valve x Objective (HE) Minimise upstream storage Replaces Downstream Link x Sump Available ✓ Invert Level (m) 97.970 Product Number CTL-SHE-0112-5700-1006-5700 Design Depth (m) 1.006 Min Outlet Diameter (m) 0.150 Design Flow (I/s) 5.7 Min Node Diameter (mm) 1200 I Flow+ v14.0 Coovright © 1988-2026 Causeway Technologies Ltd I Alan Traynor Consulting I File: Flow Rev B.pfd I Page 3 Causeway Network: Storm Network Liam McElgunn 20/05/2026 Node Atten Tank Carpark Storage Structure Base Inf Coefficient (m/hr) 0.00000 Invert Level (m) 97.986 Slope (1:X) 300.0 Side Inf Coefficient (m/hr) 0.00000 Time to half empty (mins) 70 Depth (m) 0.988 Safety Factor 2.0 Width (m) 3.280 Inf Depth (m) Porosity 0.65 Length (m) 15.360 MONAGHAN PLANNING SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FUITHER INFORMATION I Flow+ v14.0 Copyright © 1988-2026 Causeway Technologies Ltd Alan Traynor Consulting File: Flow Rev B.pfd I Page 4 4r Causeway Network: Storm Network s.,/ Liam McElgunn Results for 1 year +20% CC Critical Storm Duration. Lowest mass balance: 99.33% Node Event US Peak Level Depth Inflow Node Flood Node (mins) (m) (m) (us) Vol (m3) (m3) 15 minute winter Si 10 100.284 0.059 6.2 0.1071 0.0000 15 minute winter S2 10 100.169 0.065 19.3 0.1299 0.0000 60 minute winter S3 43 98.188 0.218 11.5 0.2469 0.0000 60 minute winter Sext 43 97,500 0.030 5.5 0.0000 0.0000 60 minute winter Atten Tank 43 98.188 0.202 5.4 5.7750 0.0000 Link Event US Link DS Outflow Velocity Flow/Cap Link Discharge (Upstream Depth) Node Node (I/s) (m/s) Vol (m3) Vol (m3) 15 minute winter Si 1.000 S2 6.1 0.686 0.144 0.1608 15 minute winter S2 1.001 53 18.9 1.229 0.183 1.0673 60 minute winter S3 1.002 Sext 5.', 1.705 0.038 0.0210 16.9 60 minute winter Atten Tank 2.000 53 -5.4 -0.267 -0.146 0.1216 MONAGHAN CO. COUNCIL PLANNING SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FU ITHER INFORMATION I Flow+ v14.0 Copyright © 1988-2026 Causeway Technologies Ltd Alan Traynor Consulting File: Flow Rev B.pfd Page 5 Causeway Network: Storm Network Liam McElgunn 20/05/2026 Results for 10 year +20% CC Critical Storm Duration. Lowest mass balance: 99.33% Node Event US Peak Level Depth Inflow Node Flood Node (mins) (m) (m) (I/s) Vol (m3) (m3) 15 minute winter Si 10 100.305 0.080 10.9 0.1461 0.0000 15 minute winter S2 10 100.191 0.087 33.8 0.1748 0.0000 60 minute winter S3 48 98.426 0.456 19.8 0.5152 0.0000 120 minute summer Sext 98 97.500 0.030 5.7 0.0000 0.0000 60 minute winter Atten Tank 47 98.426 0.440 12.6 13.5211 0.0000 Link Event US Link DS Outflow Velocity Flow/Cap Link Discharge (Upstream Depth) Node Node (us) (m/s) Vol (m3) Vol (m3) 15 minute winter Si 1.000 S2 10.7 0.795 0.253 0.2445 15 minute winter S2 1.001 53 33.3 1.406 0.322 1.4667 60 minute winter S3 1.002 Sext 1), / 1.722 0.039 0.0216 29.0 60 minute winter Atten Tank 2.000 S3 -12.6 -0.376 -0.342 0.1255 MONAGHAN CO. COUNCII PLANNING SECTION 1 0 JUN 2026 FUTHEfl NFORMATION I Flow+ v14.0 Copyright © 1988-2026 Causeway Technologies Ltd Alan Traynor Consulting File: Flow Rev B.pfd Page 6 Causeway Network: Storm Network Liam McElgunn Results for 30 year +20% CC Critical Storm Duration. Lowest mass balance: 99.33% Node Event US Peak Level Depth Inflow Node Flood Node (mins) (m) (m) (us) Vol (m3) (m3) 15 minute winter Si 10 100.317 0,092 13.7 0.1668 0.0000 15 minute winter S2 10 100.204 0.100 42.7 0.1990 0.0000 60 minute winter S3 52 98.611 0.641 25,2 0.7247 0.0000 480 minute summer Sext 280 97.500 0.030 5.7 0.0000 0.0000 60 minute winter Atten Tank 52 98.611 0.625 17.5 19.5725 0.0000 Link Event US Link DS Outflow Velocity Flow/Cap Link Discharge (Upstream Depth) Node Node (I/s) (m/s) Vol (m3) Vol (m3) 15 minute winter Si 1.000 S2 13.5 0.841 0.319 0.2914 15 minute winter S2 1.001 S3 42.2 1.488 0.408 1.5465 60 minute winter S3 1.002 Sext '1. / 1.722 0.039 0.0216 37.0 60 minute winter Atten Tank 2.000 53 -17.5 -0.462 -0.473 0.1255 MONAGHAN CO. COUNCIL PLANNING SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FU 1THER INFORMATION I Flow+ v14.0 Copyright © 1988-2026 Causeway Technologies Ltd Alan Traynor Consulting I File: Flow Rev B.pfd I Page 7 Network: Storm Network Causeway Liam McElgunn Results for 100 year +20% CC Critical Storm Duration. Lowest mass balance: 99.33% Node Event US Peak Level Depth Inflow Node Flood Node (mins) (m) (m) (us) Vol (m3) (m3) 15 minute winter 51 10 100.332 0.107 17.8 0.1949 0.0000 15 minute winter S2 10 100.220 0.116 55.2 0.2314 0.0000 120 minute winter 53 94 98.907 0.937 21.3 1.0595 0.0000 60 minute summer Sext 117 97.500 0.030 5.7 0.0000 0.0000 120 minute winter Atten Tank 94 98.907 0.921 14.2 29.2589 0.0000 Link Event US Link DS Outflow Velocity Flow/Cap Link Discharge (Upstream Depth) Node Node (I/s) (m/s) Vol (m3) Vol (m3) 15 minute winter Si 1.000 S2 17.5 0.895 0.414 0.3556 15 minute winter S2 1.001 S3 54.6 1.588 0.529 1.6457 120 minute winter S3 1.002 Sext 'l. / 1.721 0.039 0.0216 61.8 120 minute winter Atten Tank 2.000 S3 -14.2 -0.357 -0.385 0.1255 Iuorirat-ylW %o V. koU5JIVk,IL ` PLANNING SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FWITHER INFORMATiON I Flow+ v14.0 Copyright © 1988-2026 Causeway Technologies Ltd Greenfield runoff rate estimation tool irwallingford www.uksuds.com I Greenfield runoff rate estimation tool (https://www.uksuds.com/) 'his is an estimation of the greenfield runoff rates that are used to meet normal best practice criteria in line with :nvironment Agency guidance "Rainfall runoff management for developments", SC030219 (2013), the SuDS Manual 0753 CIRIA, 2015) and the non -statutory standards for SuDS (Defra, 2015). This information on greenfield runoff rates may be he basis for setting consents for the drainage of surface water runoff from sites. 'roject details late 14/05/2026 raloulated by fake blewitt reference Ilodel version 2.2.3 .ocation late name Tydavnet rite location Monaghan 19 it' IIX i 1;n © OpenStreetMap (https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright) contributors, ;Ite easting (Irish Grid) 264037 ite northing (Irish Grid) 339100 ite easting (Irish Transverse Mercator) 663975 ite northing (Irish Transverse Mercator) 839104 >ite details otal site area (he) .5857 ha areenfield runoff Method lethod IH124 H124 My value Mp value AAAR (mm) 1021 mm O 1021 low should SPA be derived? WRAP soil type VRAP soil type 5 C 5 'PR 0.53 )Bar (IH124) (I/s) 5.7 )is growth curve factors MMyvalue MJ�pvaue lydrological region 13 O 13 year growth factor 0,85 year growth factor 0.95 0 year growth factor 1.4 0 year growth factor 1.65 00 year growth factor 1.95 00 year growth factor 2.15 lesults lethod IH124 low rate 1 year (I/s) 49 I/s low rate 2 year (I/s) 5.4 Ids low rate 10 years (I/s) 8,0 Us low rate 30 years (I/s) 94 us low rate 100 years (I/s) 11.1 lis low rate 200 years (Ifs) 12.3 vs lease note runoff estimation is subject to significant uncertainty. Results are therefore normally reported to only 1 decimal lace. Where 2 decimal places are provided, this does not indicate accuracy to this level, it has been adopted to prevent :ero' figures from being reported. Outputs less than 0.01 I/s are reported as 0.01 I/s. )isclaimer his report was produced using the Greenfield runoff rate estimation tool (2.2.3) developed by HR Wallingford and available at uksuds.com (https://www.uksuds.com/). he use of this tool is subject to the UK SuDS terms and conditions and licence agreement, which can both be found at uksuds.com/terms-conditions -ittps://www.uksuds.com/terms-conditions). The outputs from this tool have been used to estimate Greenfield runoff rates. The use of these results is the asponsibility of the users of this tool. No liability will be accepted by HR Wallingford, the Environment Agency, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford ydrosolutions or any other organisation for the use of these data in the design or operational characteristics of any drainage scheme. Latitude 54.29679 Longitude -7.0173 Easting 263977.2 Northing 339126.3 Duration 0.5 yrs 1 yrs 2 yrs 3 yrs 4 yrs 5 yrs 10 yrs 20 yrs 5 mins 2.8 4 4.7 5.7 6.4 7 8.8 10.9 10 mins 3.6 5.2 6 7.3 8.1 8.8 10.9 13.4 15 mins 4.2 6 6.9 8.3 9.3 10 12.4 15.1 30 mins 5.5 7.7 8.9 10.5 11.7 12.6 15.4 18.6 1 hour 7.3 9.9 11.3 13.4 14.7 15.8 19.1 22.9 2 hours 9.5 12.8 14.5 16.9 18.5 19.8 23.8 28.1 3 hours 11.1 14.8 16.7 19.4 21.2 22.6 27 31.7 4 hours 12.4 16.5 18,5 21.4 23.3 24.8 29.5 34.6 6 hours 14.6 19.1 21.3 24.6 26.7 28.3 33.5 39 9 hours 17 22.1 24.6 28.2 30.6 32.4 38 44.1 12 hours 19.1 24.5 27.2 31.1 33.6 35.6 41.6 48 18 hours 22.3 28.4 31.4 35.7 38.5 40.6 47.2 54.2 24 hours 25 31.6 34.8 39.4 42.4 44.6 51.6 59 2 days 31.5 39 42.7 47.8 51 53.5 61 68.9 3 days 37.2 45.5 49.4 54.9 58.5 61.1 69.2 77.6 4 days 42.3 51.3 55.5 61.5 65.2 68 76.6 85.5 6 days 51.7 61.9 66.6 73.3 77.5 80.6 90.1 99.8 8 days 60.3 71.6 76.8 84.1 88.6 92 102.3 112.7 10 days 68.5 80.7 86.4 94.2 99.1 102.7 113.7 124.8 12 days 76.3 89.5 95.5 103.8 109 112.9 124.5 136.2 16 days 91.4 106.1 112.9 122.1 127.9 132.2 145 157.8 20 days 105.8 122 129.4 139.5 145.8 150.4 164.3 178.2 25 days 123.2 141.2 149.3 160.4 167.2 172.3 187.4 202.4 30 yrs 50 yrs 75 yrs 100 yrs 120 yrs 12.3 14.3 16.1 17.5 18.4 15.1 17.4 19.4 21 22.1 16.9 19.5 21.7 23.5 24.6 20.7 23.6 26.2 28.2 29.6 25.3 28.7 31.7 34 35.5 31 34.9 38.3 40.9 42.6 34.8 39.1 42.7 45.5 47.4 37.9 42.3 46.2 49.2 51.1 42.6 47.4 51.6 54.8 56.9 47.9 53.1 57.6 61.1 63.3 52.1 57.6 62.3 65.9 68.3 58.6 64.5 69.6 73.5 76 63.7 69.9 75.3 79,3 82 73.8 80.4 86 90.2 92.9 82.8 89.8 95.6 100 102.9 91 98.3 104.4 108.9 111.9 105.7 113.6 120.2 125.1 128.3 119.1 127.5 134.6 139.8 143.2 131.6 140.5 147.9 153.4 157 143.4 152.8 160.5 166.3 170 165.6 175.8 184.3 190.5 194.5 186.6 197.5 206.5 213.2 217.5 211.5 223.2 233 240.1 244.7 Appendix B Permeable Paving, Hydrobrake & Attenuation Tank Details Tobermore 12 9 I I II' i pA I', j I - 0 Hydropave Z//.-- /j/ Permeable Paying � 1, .: _ -''� F� ��,�'� ..•.�� '� � � ` ��' ,`. /� •-,-....� ^ 1 '�+. ter:,. �,� � •` _ *•N,.�. � i I i girt 't rt r\�1\'`\�\� `\ \ - ' //,1 I '\ ' / / I! \ \ \ \ \ Contents Hydropave WhyTobermore? 4 Why Permeab'ePaving? 12 System Design & Install 16 Product Range 16 Catalogue of Designs 22 Design Form 34 Instructions & Warnings 35 °a Tobermore Trust Tobermore A Proud History SAND & GRAVEL Co. 75 Years & counting Behind every remarkable company Iles a story of vision and exceptional determination. At Tobermote our Inspretbnel stay began over75 yearn ago when Sam Henderson returned from the met eta young Ines. Ws maherhed seed £500 du, Islet aeroy and IHs vats qukfdy masted Inc fledging randy business. Sam went onto lead the business Imo ploneeMg psoduclbn d concrete products before stssquent deebpments tots the fcu derlons torthe Tobennrre brand, Today Tobeenrre rarnens fanny owned end managed, whh the same Nslon,delenninadon end values whkhare Ir . drivingthe business forwardesoneof the 1St ANW Ireland's leadingmanufacturers of concrete paYngand w.'Ing products. We ate now trusted supp'lersto some of the coureays most prestigious schemes at partnership with Ieadingcorirectors and housebWders. At Tobermore 'arerage°Isracer acceptable Our recent C4m Irnestment In the v rki's most advanced mervufaoturrgerpiprnent is Indicegva of ourdetemNatbn to always serve our chosen markets with eacelent quatty and service. In 2018 we launched a fresh new face forTobennore refacing the energy and sprit witch drives our people to bringmarkebbeatng solutions to designers and contractors across the coumry. rmovatbn fuels our gnaw h as we find nex ways to further enhance product performance, waking us erttlws!astb about Tobarmore's future Ira market wh%ch recognises the true value of our Might first trra reaporela ser roo, 'I Tobermore Tobermore I_ Our continual investment in people and new technology is securing Tobermore's excellence for both quality and service. o.aa ".rd.... t/eragrg o+ecw I 4! Tn ret Tnhorrnnro lecnnlcel rxceiience PrimeTop® PrimeTop is the high performance feature which differentiates Tobermore from standard concrete paving. Tobermore's PrimeTopis manufactured with a premium, hard-wearing surface layer which adds significant . performance benefits. * Hard4vearingSurface rr y Tha PrtmaTon svrface'ayor naszdense we woducetwodNferent rtlatcxt3l mtwt ` �, Jt' Rr }'-.{�' ewno hW.fF o ggogates,wrd IM PrVneToplayefand a ma stbase +. P r s p`" " . sand and a hWM pememago ofeemaM_ II formU'ated for OPGmum stnl Wm _ t• .•. ,i 7 ' Trw rorroaod aufow'oyorh nwanccd pnrformanpoeoayomarsrwnne strowrhard Imsesod resbtenato svrwrtaw sy,pmducNgannsooaratye vsarandteer,foroothoedasAn end bondtnatstandvao test dtlme ve-k.zrtmifio. 5' Aesthetic appeal & enhanced weathering 5. Tho PrimoTnpw,ExeiayntcontMYwa r hghconrsMOi nofalgrrw_nlcea g vhe tn!ouranderoetxiona UT ptwfwma nce.'oadbg to anha read t+oamefrgpr000rtles. , '(Tobermore T000more P, oTooaranpnnodforrte nperbr'oryg-term retortion ofcdour 1l PrhnsTop aMv e'ap000L Lone for poductsv/tnthe PdmaTop ogo More JMore Cemet ii'L: Pogm kit I Trust Tobermore Product Performance ✓ Ef-Stop 6 Combatting efflorescence Every aspect of our product's performance is researched and optimised to provide an excellent long-lasting appearance. In respect t the challenge of efflorescence, we have inveAft in manufacturing technology which enables to produce virtually efflorescence free pavin 1 1 11 ltd In tlnrTo1.nsrrrrrtrerj I/,et1 i. 1..1 IN 5avm 12n, nUlfls Y 111 I I i. in I, vnrrnval all iy C Jrra5rn 1 71 V toc421 n. A J ...Itr,t :'tte I Jlry IV i rll rtIn rsl ienI Y n Iw.lt r.:l 1 1 rll Yli 1 1. 1MxnAv it vxn. 11.1•. ,-O: il,I1,YIM'.dn lalcnli .I:IYI1:lyu,ulhaluosd , Il:u i:-nl'AI"IIJ.'ll nnn, .1,n,"to. IYAri.ng,lm.n fin:Innp,lll tls uliite..,ysl ,,,>nb::l:ino nldrxes 11.,r—in,;L:ln�a.11 ;tn :n llk .I,il:xv;axl"{.ck, Its la:ldc x"evilltxlu:tclnln .,lq.._.:I:lllidtlr�lxrn:n UasIahwtimmliYd0Jy. ■ Efsto(i Carna�++�n.. DO 1 7obennore 4 L � Vapour Cured The Ef-Stop protection includes an intense vapour curing process. Vapour penetrates to the core of the paver. TrustTobermore Reliable Partner A ServiceSure ServiceSure is Tobermore's unique package of customer service benefits developed to ensure en efficient, consistent and streamlined experience, This unbeatable, seamless service follows your project from Initial enquiry to delivery and beyond, keeping you fully informed at every stage. Delivery Excelknce You can trustTobemrore to h45 iox order on tme and hfules agreed. This Industryleadng service Is praenweekin week out end Ys201ewe aduered outstanding deli ery performance with 99.47% of orders on x Band h fW. yv, frith teohNoel Idol on, des�n oxpport and sampes. Tobemrore's canprehenskewebsitep o desedditlonalaccesstoUsefclh'omtatbn. TNs is backed op bye package of the Industryc leadkrg speocatlon tools looludhgNOS Plus/Createend DPI level 2. 1rT'obermore Unrivelled Availability With more stock on the ground anda fastertorncound on bold, odofed calareweoffermarketiedingnvolelsDty one ful range of peo r% end waling products. Deoeuse we menufooture everything on pro site we can conbire ndxed product loads forcustonree friendly logistics. nL Fes! Quote Inldigerd Ordering 1J89 c i r r yv Wedways turneroundquotes Every order placed with Tobernxrre Is sense checked Plus & Croato Level2 Scrvcct wltNn oreworking day. on receipt by one of our hunted adosors wfio will bib xith you dOeoty to snore quantity, format end detvery deters ere right first Ilene. Al orders vii receive err order Confknsvtbn whh learpmducterxipekyng In'ormetlore ao M.� flooding & Pollution As urban and Industrial areas throughout the country have continued to expand, the total area of Impermeable surfaces such as roofs, roads, pavements and car parks has Increased. I Thls means that ralnfal cannot Infiltrate rretwdy Into the ground q,deky enough end put ow already oterloeded drainage systems to an a en greater test. The ogeingiredtlonal drohage systems ere tugh muntenonce end r>o longer atf.to cop.. Rainwater wtuch would normdyrecharga groundwaterorvredends Is new washed dreoty Into woteroourses'Asconwem onel drenege systems W th globalwarming leadng to Itroreased lerets of tWdI,our egaing dmtnage systems ere nobngerebk to cope orth highwduntss of stone ureter run oft Thls leadsto flesh f oodingand inaaesed polknlon. Pollution Risk Flooding Risk Durytg periods of nky weather The Enstwiment Ageroy teoott reoowd where such dea'wment heaymtva's, hrwaro.•ton onthe Ainumn2000 food,t,tho wmudft f on at listfrnm rnodng d,ruooerandolherpohn.nts UK,enlhed'LossocLearnod, or mayca�sofoodngo'aarhera.' are deposited o:rinpe mezb'a ALfumn2000F'ooWoonoudod Tom eart/Incnoased wtkco no,iyuWnennwynsnyese that anestimeted 185nnton runoftnav de ebpm.nts oust po'tnarxs emnzs-wd lrnodreb1 a unmes,185,000commerck oecaretulykacutedenddeOgned. systems andordupiorilwr o,optvtas end8 mlton otxtp'a Wmtenp{xoo•Lein,smrrnveter do,mstreamhrters wfrrue tnny hthoUKerenowotrkk1"' source oontrolmeasureswhbn den gowl d4onatytau foodng The Erthonmm Ageiw,/s e'wMooeweteftrualty a,hlicatIoo egtloyand onoctkebr $hoed oehcorporetadhbtne too prcleodmotfoodptdos states dn,ebdnamofoposa, t ot'Innopatpeete de,wopment vdtti n f ood pk hs sea, d be Ilf11ll l I�rl IliiiIil.I1 Permeable Paving The solution to flooding problems is the use = ' / /'' of more sustainable methods of storm water , ' . % ;• drainage which take Into account quantity, J,- � 7 quality and social issues, r - ' `; These are rmv Warred roessuD3(SusfAnaaeurban DWnage$yetMIl l - ,�f ' S"ue made up Oranunberdstrtwiues,vrttichEduda:- "� r i' ,, / ,/ / �/ �./ /" / / j r/ �. � 1 # • Pormooblo pevemonts ! � j .. j• % ! e / .� . Swares andfdter strips • Brisinaendwettand,t • IWltranondosces - '�� -• - /i�•. %. r , / i� /. • r j t ` ♦ / p •./. • •/" r Sustainable urban Drainage Systems SUDSare movsu tehab0osrausa they: Welerqudlty Ynprovament • Doa rite noficose towfnrattfak Permeebo nu4nglswryoffo:Usatremorb • Monageootentia loodngattbsourco pdut'onfrom rundtThepoUtrntemoyrenralnon • Protoctorennanoswebuquetry the wrbCe or nlzy oefusnod Motes underl ifg • Provider noobetlorwidieleuroanarnas pavement eyroWvxe everyNgepercentag. • Protect reefer insertion from of tie 0utann Ufafitefed, trappedordtgmde eccklortalsdisond polut'on over time Evonnshe pared lntotceotars.wnai are • Alwrmwdewbpment ineraswlwreoxrsthg used Intredlon5 drnhage wham_sareyenwe ly se,wragesystams era etfu l cepoolt;enao'ng ro bngor requlreddue totnnnaturel (emote of -Ndu o mortwbinoAtVg areas poiutemsthroughtno oermab'epeheg suoaouee. • Are symoet rob totne erororsnerrel setttrg Per woe data! ad ttkXmatbnun refer qua of pease ervdtneneeetsoftho one comnunty refertotnoGuldetoteodes$noonstoecbnend • Encouragenutural gwrtivater reonarge matrtonence dcerleroto bockpefineaoo peremeds ThelncLsbnofaperrneedepedhg wrfaca as partof Dagn&Cororucbon ofConcrete Boca Permoabe aSuDS seoWnel rwtonyincmasotne kulx>odvi PavmrentsedWn7pnxLw 1'oj l/uopmr pamhgoroaxals ooklgeooraed bWmayalsooffer ea!aoe brdrnvn'oedonwav4no,M1tgorguk the desaooera iD15%cost sori+gsowt tradtbne nest hods elrre to a slgneba rt reducton et matwga costs (Wiles, marvroes worn Imncaxnrseto} Four Elements of Permeable Paving 1. ParmeebllIty wruve weer cannot Infi bateblot'he wbgrede,an Tneirdruet'nnratetnmugnlhjo'ntsdncviyl deed YnnenmeaW'tmomorena mustbe'ekf batwoen the oonorme tuner perrnazo'e neningls s'gnNrxnt'y hignor wogradeand wb-btueondwoppoduotnsskdesto trtantnetypca r/Melre.eshthaUKardlro'and detehtnewetet Tneeforaevenattarar'ov rgforsome♦dt'tcogghg oerifmethamis sttlahuge feruonrd saletyoeltln 3. PolMion SWdas navaseownthzte.vnvAthWnrnai'teerance Asvaterfmns saviyhtotva sob base kcd ides nne laig tarmhit ratoncooabt�ty ofpsrrneoopnng vtnlndldue eggregetocamporwnroerddeoosirs ydl exceed UKarrd lreendh/drobg'cel requiernents oo Utants onthe,rwrfece. Ito ergewrhoe area of tnoeggrogeluendl enwreoffecttefitanngoftha 2. Detention ou htads wftn eretim o.vken dunn try nature Then ooesethb<nessshwd oedesignodtodetaln m!croblzlectbn. .In lzi leg toougnan 24 nears and must ore deaf eas130%voidsaaoo,A4120mmcoerseooengreded 4.Blrvotute crushodrockto BSENIS2422002,vo uooflOM Thespaetllcatbnofapermoeb aoehng structure or rmaenant Leusad.ifrhadedigrna optstosoe,:fy dependuueonthe'n/trauiluand tmffo ending a ternetre mb'nrias, a sttetrial must be urdertanrnao ceeroctalst!csanduponthepronertesofthe enwra tnotthei b -g course mmerb doe rKK 4rado wogrede.Moet pvrernenshtnoUK1'A on regjImdto t'nowbdsesematerlhTne!aytrgceirsenldpire/ef eaeetreterdetereiorrceoedily retnerthan hrttretbn matadalnust boa 622mmgritto BSF1Jf3242:2002 oocausodtiwwbgrzdutypaskbreoommendod Tniswsueun aoenituststo oerkornaestartdwll todastgne ocvrneeo'e padngsyslem Wstorara?otel not trvado the wobase nrateda, in grourdcondtlons o Wrringdw1ng24hours. FyCIcbeo Fumnab'o P.x; System Design & Install Typleal Atteneotbn6y.tem(6ym.m C) ��yy tMe4 endeU dNN t10 A:arneaian sySvntmpwredy can urcedhrOcDra SIXe'> the Weer N 1M connoted stone bon:e:h the poor boron \ I 11frmP DMel elflgEearn " •1O*y re'aen0d b It See the —oo��l tber Ma'aM tkanags Y>' er s a Tim nwdore .r.at?MJeW.91.eo4S1 lt nft'rry —>»mru.,wser,.v.a.a ft-.eitcAfrbe frannrevltdrxvey tonne?, .e er?et ar.o..eesr.v taaoro + pvatro Typical Attenuet on System (Stoles, A) Into ei:nebm Once 0t000 1110 (/ r- r r ��abnteMFrxdrreae earl ate to nor LOMB tfraagh ho 1 ONNWd none berw h :le go ! .___eau%ati i:c cetzsrot cohere bang :knsy marred bosh ,rr rwtn amse'+dra Wohoge difvoo ro5e'bostkt ,gams otrnitIsaln e.dding by., Th.b'octs amtinadr srge832er germs i' %'•� �'+'L'• £N7533 32009'. Bob.be.e At42nntzvvn2®ededeggr elnas B3 EN 13242230'2 run M reed red 7115 oory»tens A rnnedsed rods are/er.mw ssnks tenet ' eptdc,dkve mkadSdol b cote oVa'000 L51lICXlardhCC20esadv'g b0tlo A3o.tbebveethrsl Trep119oA1bo FoMthodksbkdoctkdn,can adsF�W MratntF/oonn'ngrrcr�kl ••mom„tererade omoopesda eaeelres ee nremrrya:l0 faoh-Me, got a my p.eNes rm tb ore boo sr/to rv/ daslebtw Ile pncrnon.Ffxmrabr W took6nY7vwoo•Yurtoltat-R57ti3i'32x(? FbcmaWend Jreerieorrarmaeb gmacndo'udo eW.Wdoagndpam.deb paa:rerra & ,5no •thee -s. 1.1-hdrl]'vdsa•a'spC ne('ele fLYr) Whettyp..ot.y.t.ms..edbbl.? Howdoldesi,,.permubl.pMtgsyst.m? T?ameotcn 00rrnon apes drrsme?hb pentsenc Peace miler atrafdatrgscumdmrrr• ttorx Mono tar eon lrtleoxn 65'76.4332000poAnorrsroncoredeHtdao; mooed ruevuxklva{uvsthbla7u Send Whatsyst.n should)em? desgn d permoahepz. eras. Cob (entree irtJMe09yen to npaoah:ergrlGe9 vein, ran rye.hodobgn W.Ica tr)ourprtnsdoprhgprgect. Nyof regrke speW'.n airroToboeroocenprenn Sn wrcrc:t rich copesnood dx'g0 seaVisor. Whet ere the key components et a permeable povksg eyt.m7 upperg.oWW. Tra kevwv-:ocher o ee gseme aie sebbapriw An eppegs+vmNe men oreadbnMemtlo sb ease 0.+ddteg Ise•.1opo#rgbexks anti 01ytdnggm. A, kmg Brd hehskl ,glryer Plnsmrdca a&47633'320305e asdw 4eoe'c aMen Way a)' dcegelhhe see iM hncernbnelonr Coot t rrpxrb:r. nw.r. e:oplsvgu:dose an neaulOe rr0r_ Whet If this grandis pee, or m.r. on lb. Vdflwd whktaonthepmlog? \ragas I�pmcrerr. beta dal be nnakd be'wr tr'e pro reabe pevrq b erelue :f ld green can nocc Yw.rnrnvrd keel M thop soth Thesrg'rn M7.n p%acr"tdogntheta ttoI:beon tto 0,0*0 se.vgory rrgwe6 Tlw:noreoor Wrmonppas of srlryaresnre)e saree6v+wn -.W A (C' B/)erdCeeen:S.ebsscarsuc•adad gy ega (eecxbAl $n't'rvlo is oe Q+n a 00ernc l/etaian eMC—St.bb edcnod Gededh00t dal ba lourcl h 63753313 2009. Earned snemetm m Fr1.vcomorelcnoIrivneor be repined eereq let What Se the,ells regeteed or permeable area (Hytopee.) to Hnperm..bl. le Iron (road., roof. eta)? Sarwvru, weer horn beW rg noon v ncoby Impvmeeb'e areaorated I rtb pert-emtlo pnn rg t.13 ben: a do 7v3 ray el tneraxedeneeeo rmsohmatypOdmand2' eon Mi 'odors on hswmTtb!a Did (WrrPahku»'A Net:Aper meads p/rogdesgnretestoo.yot eeog Vtearronraggegeni Prc,eo*000040nnn00n10rJ0001 eeenann-.bullth e2 hones etriedaggro5e00 ee10ote632m Idly.ee.•d1d nt rlespe2Ms r1 pa,.W 3' h9rMSM spsctkatan(BS E?n 132elt2002) In p:af s,,wr0000-0 oobece:eten daz ,P20 cceard ss-rd,o tTabeit 'dngroTto0lbmi NCE'.5aw�0ngs lele'ette tornIty5 etelda d. The gerstrn:d Mh. es- lnderet1thne*'remdoM shad]bow orycoimlrgmvar&Sr our expeieW 0 erect riseduggeWres is one vet tee frost coerce reaso-u!orit& .d a pnnnnbe prng swam Install Ho b Net I. p.mrbI. pMng sy.t.n Pbaoe refertor r b`.Mrgwecasdbeter+atan.837533 32005P nx00000e _hdwncvelelreoc050eoeen mernrnn roYki idayW.bntvtotr psrxa comM mespe g b'Cke•ne drypn.aebrfroxb'ap o'retrs • ee4bas.14020mm.ggnget. Atixp-9 rio req<rroddponh d smelt poHm,ir rced,orl.nmMren, v111angndefe:kxkvnr,A+ a the 05+0011 • B.ddng1.)-0.32—la)4g rnwss mar TM UKSY•p brut mold M son.W.ddt o,4r :tn 420, e • PMr1hlodw Wnq)era Il'M'cs Nt pi. 1 b do rktivnrwx 1,nthry rMWMpr cGa(Wbdorede e32+rxnWae Ix:srod Irniroldn'sracdhcyene wnpptefyhl W. Jdntll g Ae I.-blts ut.Mtledai nbywthR32rrmgrcJt5oo eshnlamnr,h4yfirtf noon Nalnopnsp4emnam'm. diw Wcssdarao.Ybreomerldrte00 eaten we 4vs use del o:(WMs. of enir lx a wend Yd .m nor hAamapp dupofdl 1.inrrssnoldbekepNedr etrtlt = Yoend reed eppm,r*01 mndgrafaeory f1()rt2 CO f21rmpa.hg 'iToberrnore Net. ere shard bebeonitia:tw pxmosb'o;drtsdo rot b--.ouoa•frreledasotrkMS sde-o is ca -pared Spend Care rtaeis a be tlkw Wl%n edl Idd crap rg i s eerhd M Sc 11054 sd' doss not.rer ire Aeon. (Ion 7mlore dew 5 Woo rerrsxf out hr 010(000 vet the �a-ebbp/ngata/dhepb .ad tymeppmpean :o pole. i w pre to hen bcr�9 co eo-r reed. Ads•.s.w.dhn b00more s1.patrdmtnge0a1r0 Vasdkhdmlv.or. S pros Ne to Instil in reWc: n room e3:are w00 ear mrcSrhosca'C. d.sandedpe.hg. Melnten.nn Evan elterelgdng to doggtg c.udns lore loran the ire blkgarrn M!trottenntpabnydpermeeb'a pe•kg w8 rrormhly sebreeey Cooed lbSn10bokgmreaps mrvrs Tee 0Tn &ottMtsof po•mmb'e phYngdoesdabeaR boor t staS non core s rd on oleos kv doe Ig knit tern WHVzon metes substx+!enyo . ,dX(rdrkr rogWanoee. Not. Ionn epb-,un wk.-- roe reoommord tmrt peY5 IS Scared wssee stoat. 0001.) deenlog tolwn .I a'ao hastier been p. W, .saw n v wale London eau Afw i is,?ou Iray wan a Igtdy hose dawn to p : e\g arern>Ae-yerceodr-TM.sa.l klixkrbelosei nthsnoedkr(e sgrro'mo re,awabreeinnsa) as f044 heel G.e. tdot pegrA0sloxyYlgbpemroie Witte d dmvs In roam,-mittL 1.010 cdo.red trod,, mnpasse tyre mnhsardeslod M erep.e^Vvnrws.Mo reed ten bran yea -hot, vnl recd rose rats Woe Nde. crap oppemvrw Is lobe netraced. A Sgl t parer lose S -odlen eraCra 5 pernrd ly al 1trd npanrm4o crest genet]brtend e an Art/pmts gobnerdrlirurrredCoot be rstixxd.Oaks:ue hsprxeenlxrsm rec#srrses AAodeeashodMazxditetra ire rep octnwfre log,nonp ns53 nsolbmrg e5ne5 ekes pace. P000 Cb ran use veoam o: raper s es pnxg g 500nesere-oedA0000 lirthorb7wfmnurson sCr.+ws rrHamksn Cadem ldobrpnmmnrtrm.xf martennJadoarvyee lied:perneaN,paeans FL:Gn 0produ pnr b/tarW,aaa54No FX d?ntdxdM w.m. peon ngaguk Its., tudunclegled)OW. Arno senor/ )ears rise /ins rv/ Ixm•w do/Ood nth daoioe u -d nr-ay bereomsryeedemlhxrnTvs can M done so holes • Petraaoeisirgytrrggrrtonddarlvsbyhghpmssva vaarhr • Poeenheparsrkbhwr t0Abtxewdspb,xd. ' Ibietxeerryderywd pe e.s.:na erne shaahryewl (moo boom boserod. • Appy 632emsir•,s see gn:biw pros. ustgesYf ineedt to orpanY„ moms.n nneoppphs tiro 1, oil. • fhshdfosab a5. r>e2pa.e Permabe Pa.'r� Product Range BLOCK PAVING MON1¼CHAN CO. C j4„ NCIL PLANN NG SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FUfTHE R INFORMATION 1�7obermore 19 PemmTop' Pi Ef•Stop' Hydropave Fusion Hydropave Shannon Permeable pevingwIth natural gnnito eggreg.tao. •:�:�;R ` Permeable pMrgwith smooth gurfege. • Fumtbns as a SUDS oav'ngsyavm ••.i1 ' £ , rS • •it 1- Fumtbnsase SuDSoaV system • ManAacturedvYth raturel antes a an lfi BSr gat Yynr: Sucurbhad-eoari mooMwrfoco Ss • Superb herdvezring gnNtesudatae Vlaent'olizstl'g Geours • Vbam'ag'Izstingcoars • Createsa strhhg.catemcorary oo'< She. ColoanAvelleble ^ D. Shes Cobun Avalhbh • 200e100x80mm • GtopMo 208x173e60mm lirecim • 300x200x80mm M'dGra7 173e173x60tem • Cwrca:l • 300 x300x80mm • Shoe Heather • 610x300e80mm Hydropave Sienna Striking toxtund permeable pevlo • Fvmtlonseso Su DS o,Nrg sysbm • Gnn)too,peemnoo • MenufocParednPa natural grento aggregates • Suporbhadvoadnggmrh000deoo • Vheito easttngcocure • Creates a strAleg, .temporary tank Ddaeina Caloun Avalleble • 208x173x60mm • Gtlp,te • 173 x173 x8Cmm • Se'dstrme &xh Yxah r_P_<xt Shot Hydropave Tegula Permeable pMrg wlthtndilbnel styling. • FumtbnsasaSuDS magsymm • PrnssedtnghoneaFqueapoaaance • Vbaat 'Oroatl'ga)auS • Sultal}e far bxn llrodernovadtkmalor,50cls SingloSbes Duo goes ColoumAveSebls • 240e120x80mm 203x173x60rnm &mean • Cede • 173x173x60mm Charcoal Heaber •Nx1'3mOnroprck SIm9 Hydropave Pedeste VeneSle permeable paving. • Fu,mtbnsasa SUDS oav:ngskstem • SuoarbhardlsearNg smooch sudote • ViaaM'agtastlgcoours Sba ColouaAvelleble • 200x100a60mm • Smarm • Natural • 200x100x80mm Carnal Heather &Hdo Hydropave 240 Efficlsntrierge format ponnoeble book paving. • Fennibns ese SaDS otr+Ing system • 9ncerb hard-noarhgSrlal.,surtace • Vltarent'nnghsibcoroerra She, Cabana Avalloblo • 240x120x80mm • &eC<en • Ctotconl • Neturel ;v4l,('i`s 3e�ls\ C(y. C,pjr '4 ,+,.,,•�d.. PLANK 'j SECIJON 10 JUN 2026 FU�Titi '!j INFORMATION Product Range PAVING FLAGS PNmerep EI•Stop' Hydropave Mayfair Flags GraNte Mhh permeable pev1ng Aage. • Funotbns es oSVDS oa/igs00m • Ma,-ofe tared vrIlh natuolgrartdoaggmro; Supe,bhtrdnoarhgg, te.face • Vlbent'oco curs • CreSastr&b€,em0Jfary ook Shea I ColovnAvelleble • 400x400x65mm Gopntte M'd Gray • SMer Hydropave Textured Flags Fremeablopas1n flogs With a modern textured sorfeoa. 2t • Fvnctbnsasa SuDS avngsstoflo • Superbhardscaringtnatured.rface r, • Vibarf'onglastl€000u0 i. r • Notorelawoe•arwo Shen ColocoAvelleble • 4000400561101m • CWrooa Naool Hydropave Standard Flags Non•sllp Affordable permeable Paving • Funotbnsas oSuD30vitgsyss;m • SupeblWdrro0Mgtexturodtrkce • Vtben, 'ong lzst0 coouts • Neturalauouarance Shea Caleun Avellebla • 400,400x65mm • chocoe Nxumt m MONAGHAN CO. CJNCIL PLANNING SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FURTHER INFO NMAT' Oa\i ryd�cd,e n= bm Para Catalogue of Designs Nihough a fu I engineering approach will be needed for virtually a pavements,Tobermore's experience suggests that the fo'bwing standard solutions will be sulte'ole In most circumstances and can therefore be used at project appraisal stage. rxuYJVLu Bub.Ww80pp1g L.ydn �"KXy'�ia.4lcsran InU-etnm d Y01t Ain de-sigm. 9ese Cdp)rgnd<roRDbe 'rntlupYdsvecHo ooln•) e*0re rn.adeck urh, na'x ntloen:npwdoalrn bndfgdadcmrM.'i,ransrlon cep•3er Gred'eckrrusbe nedoon eo,k,eFatbrm oe fncpw bxA;ho�•iww-.ruraiidfi.�,Nnf:rr teobrthoianaP#Ydtlngo es oe* suhgredm graver daamrsaass'•.c+yercf vtw•n TOeWno nmbaato—haep statksa e w *,ems: cd'ersHaerrrn tlon n'y Z0n•�d o- honahov tth'ch we dka:Iw.Mrre bo6agrencl 1hnr.tyngmW. enhuy Ivm hf Mrrn'M lglAin {Y'.�u.^wrf, la thenafppngboreero rot nn-poecd r Pe'e.'•nrs nnone enmermd rf—cdarths reon.ed, h is edasodthettSate3 dtereg.M'cmerR5d5S7503 Pan3n Irtk+.rkr rre 'e pklgovrt�o•'Idne,r pen. ternsdelsetai Itxd nd �Idart �yedrn VrlwevMtove�as exa+n-It�a» and onro nnebyaaenby Thoth sa3dcwrwgront d mrmody ennsraedon pblc uot'edplgi•wcr pNX topl>♦n: rAjeganwrbeslN3befortra 2Rb ogee,,ot,esenes dnOlatNoo O01^T°' ne"t' one sonethamerd03woee &n-jbesn40s0orxa it dA:lenua:e-i Wsgns skoudbo Td3.vr ooae'e3Utno.V eratte smdenJythckvrm_etManurr xbn wnsoortcWed.tllernl enc, rogwemirrs.l-1xmer,e sYA E(Ie.YO cepury ls:5'Ntroreenn h dank o'mYdsshauU becvrol eon Loedhfg Gtrgod.. eN.pr31A»plwge» e. ne. »dde <edlas.. Ap$.gen HUrew C e.»ple e net, vrbef.ra n., 1. r.�.•w ., all PoM.g m o-agcv+rw on, 6rroxr(se.n.9n . alai rso. pbrb� gam�;nrPw,o..amr C*otn, corn, .as.'°'" .�A'ap. e,.3rnn • '.K'(f ine 9f•krt 9 d.aarel »'va . Opera iwfhsalpd.e) • 6ya mrt asn * notes OJrtge4u're.< aelu.!((no :d3l�gym3, q!» • e n,,Puunerygsr • O. Craanth.,e . Jeaa.xv9roliu W<Nu.•egf-en • Ags-.W moosebSOYmro . S,an rn,..z»,ar»,ahwmn E.Cun-,<a' ,IHu $05 Its-Cr:/Ott, 0/not pans • Ux ₹r3tb•we v, . /nrf-lfvFM n-o.*Mc •3+m $Wa.pYbNe.< • Ven :w . �n bgs,rrn MW ,n•+., u•rxe.� t ,x.»-3,ni:nra.p3a�v.+»mm�<nan inarnrtl.Inlnn,9»w'dr.. • is Yv o3:,µ•.aa+ae.•�i• n j .:� '_, �r / 1 j jr j MONAGHAN CO. COUNCIL PLANNING SECTION 10 J UN 2026 FUrITHER INFORMATION iTobermore Attenuation Designs LOADING CATEGORY A, 1.5% CBR Kq,Or•e r. 4oirP>IM14anvroo,Je[aeY*, `C\eTHAb-a 1 \ rJrm4'601mH,o0pa,4Pax: r: • _63 ne[ob tl 63 (ml pa. b 6SI633.139% • n r 0'203n[tarop.YOrjp6%'9 E9,allrt3 1019 I,'. \A01104lQfl10t0•2•C1 . 7a70761370114 S4000n,6Cq:prp 1543 GJIA a 313144,764, 70,IPI14a110Nal.' JVM1),n.I,41 In ur4,AIWCER(Ly413 pwttl,4pa:of Tq bo.m014d ,{6012 U411a0 L.-dtn3344nv*,2 op7.01.f,36%';f(x11pa0Y[H]F„0f•V 6 a. to ItSa 6,[3 btt,146((m6.1p-,ccnbnm) mp14Iv41i:r034HP4pq LOADING CATEGORY 5:15% CRR 3, 316 0644415 orA»6,106 #6 340 Ii>nna 6Jrm Wm l3tynP.lrnb6 Pt„y, \" L N)6n ncma, d094n7 p: t06001I3242002. �.. SVFrm T 0410,, 4'20 rm 1 01 43650:000.5,6 Io &50113202.102. 10&4]6337',,13 Co a0o0(•pinno 'I h1 T,M.'.n a b•.1p-1l r I: , :1 rm nnrR INh,r rr 1, I....,w, e04ry fNR ,146,1,, pv..rpptir, raHacl ray, 300 aa:.fm,g boT.914L 6p,�64W001p K4tef21eTw2x��tCM> �0tl ,,'4'141 En: Wf-g03v,b(ch54d:ro Om LOADING CATEGORY C: 1.5% CBR 14.,,1.<r.,e�f,r� m d,w.p(m350.04601r4[Ia'. 80710 2166#R,a7Cso FHa.3v,P,.,p. 1 f5rm MYXfnN662mr pr9b05EV132122002. 1 •i1, 16363 64133 YG.n1 I p3 nm tli ,63444 UArm 11414 0,,363 a763G m T6S763 17 41 1 3 • Tp ES1fi33P61 I3 66 ba06f:1p' R t.s10 049.493.0034'30446J10d'130,.6 ,YnvoMN:b:41nw41b.(a.UUw C0RI4WO:. prmn0 410'41 mayb 7060063#56,1, 001420744.1400667 8'1-io%0 pgM IogirerteH Iwk1 y4ax•.0 0,04 0,066 p34800001o0,065310 xtl6Tap80S.#I 6I 64016663614080 6;470344664,1 11, Cl-6v`2nvn-1,44 x.1643 ,63 .01 6300 41,,6•, 6645 wPr46I.01!n6,: ]0141'4114 LOADING CATEGORY 0115% CBS C. A944.3N 4,:r6.g3444Y01006+1046„,, • 65mm11c<•664 N,C0042Pr7m1b4Pe`q • 30mm11i'n-4,4003.2rm1y1 n BS (62 15322 2002 11177 10<'6421654'l .331160 -. - 004404641634593540 I048EY13112.2202 l• 1.- -1701t717•< .641207-men#,120024820700. x86 (0 4212 2002 In 6810.11 02113 0002 Ifappey 131:0.4610 r46/8'Inr:07/0(136pm Iarp446101 m 311ern1.77h,31720615mll pn.•0214 0:v na/b6rrcnsck K4('4 -0 70060700IW10A7U 767$16.011671•X476:106021,14E-OO6f 0017.!6:bx•6po0'11464.4 4261571101663 31, to 0tl14634 60.6.790 #0040180 LOADING CATEGORY E: 1.5% CBR .5#'6t19 M,: x61044.143 (:ov (1140'44+. • 10771, 610461Mr+t06.404'1esb37.0y ' bpnnvamc�o•a3-2mmp: 66 06 3144 16314 r0.41700,40,034131 taSted mr., pxro aGpepo a 13 00 m I Iv2 on '60.7nw4Hsxnn 31, av6e3, 4023544 _ 1 008011,2022602. 70 64 7633 7'0 73 6b3#.M8CIOo 5Uns 6.413114.4,3466344(37414<•0t6.#', 146,-:(014 06630471440100C2A43,J0-#, pdrb 6'dprf%01 r6ytt Tp[, ppr b"M 4] 06610. v-lI.4 1•r•nJr6 ••)f*3•tIeY.Arnn b 1.176,-.04441b1W 1:14010 pYevR 14014(%'4 I'apr. 66-10. I .17 n r.14.66nNr79-1,63 4') LOADING CATEGORY F,1.5%CBR Cart: r066344444' k4 04'64454063044611144$17. '4644',I(2422002 {I, 3Wnn1•0,b402 ("421433 nara4436,0403$964 044641102112013. 1. 7S 7312X22%12 70134 tld <w 1,,M.n:Ml1n 766401 4 emvn-r)tp IMl03-1.4.103,6,, h M.fRi.Aap H pal 2140 xw1 Tay % mx em. 8'814». 04360 (4/0164 60110' llop•40)407• ,101 4)::21 Pcr4k4f GJ tr 1(04.,1.1 Hx1ap, min Pp4 .b0�1114 S•,.Y 61 4,663 M',4.66nib:p\ro•rn:,o>) 28 MONA(P-11A CO., COUNL PLANNING SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FURTHER INrOf MAT,ON IiTobemwre Infiltration Designs LOADING CATEGORY BI 3 & 4%CBR %,5•b,a a4p rtrra'n In �.yp1us0453.v503C5a3p�, -6OmW ft1•W,r1'Ctfms Mrob'.Pa,1p -wnm1,c4.6a V63.2*m35::0BS2T132424003 -worm;nc35n 4 x3nnva336nx3 M1yrye w�ENi3:u2tt2 leryCpc51oc:3 m 0S 2123 Pe313 LOADING CATEGORY 8,6%CBR I.b ne,"c+5 s,Tr. kt:.e Ruril35ev503M54.15. —annrt&3F,SCc.wMdFfSa. ufrNce PNS6, -Wttnvnc5r5J 0J 2nnp^•a 69 @�, J3�R &[5. 1 J501nIY cklea �rrnmte�„A 56y«6r5 �-a&1 EV•J2c2.�ppt LL1o'3 435+c. m 551633 P3113 LOADING CATEGORY C16%CBR Wlrvri141al53I&S I3 kt-53 SS53 Saw vauila c:.0S. 13rrt 111i,m H,d W4.tPSn'r.1U4 P4hq _IA rm 1131,#'.1 Mn 2mrn 6t 163E,,122422002. ----- i 26rml13u*s,anuleab53dco:+u 60MJ 155sp+1. If 63 5311324225312 -- 153 543324305 033339333353353310 6311,132422503. later �0433,3 3365 613 Pall.' LOADING CATEGORY DI 6%CBR M4:x6rmn'n n 3035 o.Ne<eq-, loan edd ne0 HW O5ws Pwrtnb's Pa.1q 60mm Ito .00f63-2ry1 *06s 0113242 2502 - IY]rm M,kwoarors105 4udttux y'ebE*020301136501132122032. *5or,rnl .1.n tm.1'wr..wd.a.cS. bBSEV13242NL L3*0199 v'4'b 13651533 PM t3 LOADING CATEGORY F, 3 64%CBR 030/:Ov £2300311 Mc»r61334ueamv 0,Ue4. -FCC mtrk M0111:1vrn3P0mvnn P3510 '0P,11554m 3(632 '1pt w63@133243]UJ2. -203nn1•e5ra431&40133 4343.03 9512050391950 w63EN13242NA2 pOk3n i 3242 V20rm4wv O05m 0331953 b 0.4 fN133d32W3 5001265110.14 b 63(3331'M13 LOADING CATEGORY F1 6% CBR 00,013 *0023191.I M3.3763'00453:10531✓334.211. Ili { - 30, m:,305201yu3o0.0P0mw3n Poo 0 50mm:,O4rc9U63dm'66l { S w&SEN132422S2. 1 11 •1)4533 c015 129'431339 01*1 3535603 2035'1133152552, •- (10nn:H00 oo0t'Nnmav96a1O13O5M33 630I(132422111 107 130'101 311 63 533PM 13 I1101tJAGHAN CO. COUNCJ PLANN NG SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FIJrITHER INFORMATION EJCrc(e Murat, F - Road Attenuation 7W. is no s{x37f a propstofwria odapJm cf SlfJ5 'xustq,eswiras4r—co6p'.m.urs.Uae 4g kgvai«,—,a,8e 38d!w FZ•gfmatsAM,'O80 and Sewn' 08 of b,a Tma, and Cowrry Px,N ng Pc. �eao, can pmdo o r• n f d n adapion m rwna ' wt�n..sv um is W.arr ris rocxr•nrsulwyeruy aa reayutibi.Wa&kgvnrrub ruvaname €odther nbms'.rm can be bIn 857533 1320000 8 Pars omsauead w,T dry neiub sans acaxm'upacts&Wforin sz MIM IWEnd (err subapsrt�rwrs HYDROPAVE ROAD ATTENUATION SYSTEM 1 11 HYDROPAVE ROAD ATTENUATION SYSTEM V101010 Ii I HYDROPAVE ROAD ADOPTION/TEMPORARYRUNNING SERVICE '1 Tobermore Sloping Site SLOPING SITES ATTENUATION SYSTEM IIff I' -" ' is r I«,. ......,..a, ..>•.... .+. T��v eri4 til^ 1 � IIr t1 SLOPING SITES INFILTRATION SYSTEM HM r*1 Ni{, ttAGNA�g �� PLANNING SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FURTHER INFORMATION 1�Tobermore Tree Planting TREE PLANTING ATTENUATION SYSTEM TREE PLANTING INFILTRATION SYSTEM L11/ Rainwater Downpipe DOWNPIPE DRAINAGE INTO ATTENUATION BYRTEM JI � llll L0LLI DOWNPIPE DRAINAGE INTO INFILTRATION SYSTEM ::5p;: � ,tir:r®.r rtr mraw R„a Paving Utility Items We have detailed a list of utilty hems that maybe required on certain permeable paving schemes. In this example we have used products end codes from Polyplpe. However, other equal or approved Items can be used. cs. `i T o S l APPROVED PRODUCTS 1 t1ANEfLSAJ.Ormdavwet.rnCSWp{Ie A,alaVerrornal IxsC010rxuo wrs 2 450da'Sor rr FWavknrhvroer PV)rAPu rdarenar oaia: JI r-alil Pu vRJlpbsJokl CR450TCa 3 bone uxr Rsfe iRdV Drn Pe'a,V rj e h RD'(%1xamP 4 /�; •G 10Ornnd nlexrRytxleodvoOnatxon 450 PVppe re+.'rere.:rr ) •Anc-.m JRD O(°00Y 6 100nxldaru'r EuteruErdcap'pertara+ Poyppa retsenaomdr. � msM usttgemn Wr EC'059nT e 110H00rrldamereedapmr Pd)pperntoe0000da () 7 11 eTr ,»a� W:Seaontaor51 Tepalsruede Ylnwradrnar4k _______ aWritelop Rr06Rlpay5loro) iTobermore Water Harvesting Tobennore Hydropave products can also successfully be used In rainwater harvesting projects. Rainwater harvesting Is a system where the rainwater from roofs and hard surfaces Is coWected through geo-ce'rlular boxes under the pavng. Tresvm3ritdundnlarodarmrd Ore lV10rgs 2 r5odror artshrgend vrzwngrrdoreterrarb'ePevava/dostlre,x seryfdyriylnrermerHbs errt sedaoovr whMv:1 NryNpla vu qyd' ramaA RNnvoPr V1a�C5t�'r$ SyoKr11 needavte s rato*/ der.e,o . WATER HARVESTING SYSTEM i t 1 1 1 1 1 AN CO. CO JNCIL PLANNING SECTION 1 0 JUN 2026 7-, 71'HEFl INFORMATION I Inn FN:mfm,m fMecabb Pn:5y Design Form - ---_- Instructions & Warnings As referred to in Tobermore's Conditions of Sale CORETER6IS(PAVNG & WALLING) tyaaw Al pcdura Wld b• cod ly Kpeet.d br be df a damev h'Tobermore RMkMmMpon bbeng NN «rmN. n>,r...e„ gerc .-_-. -_ __. _.-__.. _-.- -__-_-__ [,b wtpessertAw�tivmtlnef [erynvmrtWnd Vftbn Tobarrtan, dnU We denbpr•d d psd,ctc As eawMa•rd118 P/rgnl'icmlR'W rte�cece.FdMnC regb meedrQq O«R^+Nry •A a,d proud h4xmKMbfvbjactgdwgv aeu ch• kx3h TobmrxetPorto de bddwadebnw TObemae reamxrdf thalpafrg M w4 WamKin )au hen ear•rb tM rmwa. a, b.a, mtd'ra,d ea. iaWee raUEU dM.a uctHofmKM rard deD,Mddnend Maa..&+paa rxD'ng n�tnaK*r Fn n __.____.---.____..- _ fedbrush wOrdreydlgldKer¢aadhRon (W },wdwgN« Mp-,de AlpoducfscbJdbbsbf'ed Famdew wriU 4bst BresD NawxFd'B waderlibwm[y M1dN Wfi cbn xn:Y,shoW _-____ ___ _--___. 6.YUWtl. 6e.tsU pe rml. ms/GreWYN far aOt ertev f:N AI Abmb .gr.menpF W menenenaea Algkporo•he Krr 1um Pmsreage,YaNnnhnl seegvN Type Wsyeeea ❑Ater reecn ❑IIA'eee a ❑Remo eflwtue:lg Tdemoa pod— M,e!8 ord we? g P'aduc4 wfi ocHrnt br:sry nd 4:roGrt% h'rnaw. A hJm OWI11 GBk enw.edm flbe dA rM� la'e4'g mYerie'vn b miw wiMb,f c ARb gh awy elbrt If made b redeoed h'gRPres'"[P«• d F meg AradbbeRdrtparx4 __ __. - _.-. Naasefacbh«:r ebadraned:__ �aMe ro uct r»'.w, wiW.mf an Oeun. ey palriod hWdbPonerweAgrrrderaBetMaadwtsalea.AbW rwnin!e•, srgb aae axAueoNer!, 6.11 tDGa ,edsl Mrm'dba ttstNte'«a 4rgeenbpo.•nrnd,'ug k4sVYw. er(laPsnYf EuydeYl pod tf llw'.N ml Do pesfve xaYed. and Pedw.I hewwdaE—TOMmne Hereaemrme:OmA wd.„lfinetbrO.8n1'mvdm Ala d b/wlrg hour 5, -Om,,, Passau.h.a ea`eieslCbenhfxme:bn) rm,, $AUSCIWgd rely (Yslike'nM) _-__-._--.---__ C[Rte'Va �ya'r Nn! ,. Wer,,w,d thM era, PuWeae1 dads. 7D'tlr aoi W"Of rd,Yr Meth remoxd fret by YrR'*B OmM1Mg irxkAtl4 iMubleeeXarKl draregc: ❑its Di, espec�'Y F NyY to tm OW tt l Ye J adYN Yd ad tM pure rd then beatng tha vm veAemOw kla surhn mav'acRredmone btdr to redlM tMJrcmd6•ItiB cdw YKlmose p<r/B demY. A,GmmsNd•eiFr,N gremo.®rruss, kMreend MBmnbbest e?pletl hdryxeY rAftabeFdrpp'd ST FsstigaYatreP-Y:et ❑b9 ❑ho ty; due ro'a dot tle mlaa d nen oroducb rA1 Fero. wY N-bemk'M,P.elranbef bebr "ddf An6 men e4olmwf t«ryarNgthosa xfibh Fan been FslaYd!«eperadditme es nme:ferrgdam e,WeeOerase,d rleth hweh d,mtr.AAwaddle dale spddM rap,Knnrndrenaw :.- _ -.. -. _... _ _ . ae h Td h TM me'afxpgrob VnKnKtM aNa M abxeO Al maar awtr F raer5 trodr rce aro re Sh egrt the «�M1'e'8 paen xr Mon hr a urea acetate cdar rtabh Y,%S14 6 lcmrvg ., fU e OSOS rhef a re•er b eGbei ITDdwf MTOteA W₹fch an b! Pra.'fied. ._-.__. 1111rncanm eeera esd shmd be lemaM bl)e'd eN the voMN is a ratite a'1stMere heovt that oa+xv mast/ 'q a waN k (a a'sMa lrotr sry good Peden anbe} 6rafn m Ue eu-ices d c«arda mty Tobarmoa uaa metal needs m,Umn betnafftl tle 2yner xmdABrvdiheseW de a, era due s!ald ra q de xMn dqs 7M uv's Fslnttbs . __ -_ _Imdy «c✓rerc'd a swtdeie teciralogy b I lose.,, sw«era Tecee wiraxarae,)bxwer.BRma rash the aoDel o' the of bebea,,awr.,rrreeroWmbwyea BbraPw4ig8•Wr padud /peOerAOd dens Dnkrr Pbb waMmd- B'Ytwh Tdermae dJ rot repG. PrNucb Wth ram eeY bbdspmWe Wgerm Podsdaod.dsxhbh .esrrg erd a a,We as oecea .4 mxmdsho.'d ewala atenng eM weed aax'th We e . Ale Ylwem eat and tlPa We.'e b belsso C<oxvrenae eppeaance.lMevy!o redo[patM a',q dreDoa'f Palagard wN leaPXOPlabpeOblNBbasmt prera tea SemmNd:Ytair.. ae, amaYen'mgdddeit e•4lprrtrgmrae euleu &nkMv Sr emY rtamxed tat, tle marsNctaerb IrY'uct fia:ld __-.__ _ -._. _.__._.--___-...-. _. 1••+butt./N«bvsurr'eYoroedr+VdeGiM'.rtbamatonste. Mnaflbs b'enedxMnuf^Bo^JsoMrylBed,(hpwkrCOo rnt d hr rnafeYenoEetcbarPW,es) cod �AO— (W 11, P-4 Tobarrr«e'v woarerae, thee. traits -,*j weeder oY oeeoah __ _twe. (EeryCbnd„dds Yep Nag dMheBimE) FOR HYDIYJPAVE PAOOl10TS rig TO to wrote. Wmo encore iM mVecbr ac gMJatlm•/ydroPeue dlra/ __ __ ___.__ _ - - P W✓ Tcbemas rere.,menO duel Kt ff�ti•oyn padtk bersebe rrafeau Peoeansa bdae FmryusNon wthaFl9 F11 ]64.413 dsgrN pmr,De pco.tt - _ _.. - oat ire,,. rib. eaarinw. WeWet a tdw han a P%ea PM ten oat P+/M eYf1e'x sgfGdyhanlMfM lopA, NdrAgrmenha m.+y desynrnlm Ma,T/m WrRrlte Baled Maebhof«IrseSrs Iy Byetama rga lade Prag4MnlKon, ne eouN as4ym btaM bah Tobermd Nee6ENr606001,&4,a,fle 001 a,d1E9E•001 4r."drn yaegrRa rat nsofMe32mm bdSS _-. e,tet da+mM'rF Tabrrtnre reefYeteaMN mragemmt 5rMrett as ys'emgm 9FmRh6eMKyrtl enMrme,b'bum. YdpnVBait ev rsriM ro'emm&Ddr6Ward[gaA«eM(6S n-eeC ItNNbaser ad RodMM �Ww¢a EN 132AYEOOTyh prla.M',.M We exadn8bteb. ford mlA37ewdd:gb T.It -._.__-_._., 49218 ed raTlarereeb VIN Uhelp ace O.a:nt Rep ea.Sp raq A'DEtahrdd5BbAUe le.oda,dteecdad.TM,rpoau'db eppeawgedpOdudf Fph'meaadton. Fdbk lOdedh'olocEYWfhorldW returoej aauslrg IMn weMa.fW. ----------_--------...-----------.____.--..._--. .- aarnu.IJ edaL.d puny YM ffamg pedd.Fp.,r axareran. Fa«rla e.edaappggrrlgof bowda< nTM*A. aricorr'mwrnewvbrbt«edeperyeetle PeirMryrim Serd d coleus ---—_-'_ _-- ---__-_-- --___--_. -- --- -_ .... ena,en oMnb rnASNYd DoWefagse^d xa'ar Y^6 �� JJdi11F8 gpodpasnNdevraoretaazfmrtwm« A�p'e:b mft be rrN a tM toP xm ea 2mr aR m ao.M1 wa r<rYa peY[s Qerbaa Gen wP rte'dfdrld tlm6laia.frieWYnrrdUMMare(rn x<e« My nib Ikl aY.tbd and —fit SMMPp d --_ -- --------'-- -- - - aurae cmLLd ae a Tob V, Parn a We'-rq ot— a B cow<h 5eb j W ,bald ba Rep l'd 04 sererY,. Wl recd dG•o(a:aea dYabKxwNbbeltr«em W)rMne /ehWlesa q,paMrMtydntaw daRa•enry"AOr2d8emmpeY.y WS Ado be MQadb Tcbermpe w.NM __.— _ _—__________ —__._ _ ___. _ _... __-__. _ ._ _ _. --.- _- _-. mMi cNdaaGrodeutlbLLbnp:mmb'epabdoSLZ, aw$ «tnefN alnmxD4 m IS. tM fd5*rYM b aarpbtt0. Specal cYe be I.Msmp'rl bperied wlsooRa sdl ---------------__-._._- rasde b Leon nhu edt CORETERMS(FAVtdG ONLY) dxelw cra, ea pvte when tM DDe dxpkbbe!rp detrN P."MYMenaw• a-4 tM unizedtM pfrmeeb'e M1^B ehaJd b aotedad by en LaArus bbcbPee mafard ol dppopn PNect Nepas L«n Mhg y-tMdrehd. ...-- _ -------._-_---,- --.-----.- _ _ •mpFagro (TbtNMYmBentl as rMmda .p'lsm LhedrPxry PkessnotelFethas•poduceewareSmov N[iopaw MMMrlea aenYMMonrse apPmmuNgMmaaa'»tl. P'efglNv btoderinaebdme'edYWmeM/a Pearg R'daare,x 6Jde:re s' an'•D e m ar xnbep: wxnbdYrroremh Tobermore Contact Us GB: 0844 800 5736 NI: 028 7964 2411 ROI: 048 7964 2411 Email technical@tobermore.co.uk sales@tobermore.co.uk Paving Walling & Retaining Walls j 4 f�R Facing Brick tobermore.co.uk This Hydro -Brake Optimum includes: Technical Specification •All in 3 mm Grade 304L stainless steel ❑❑❑®®❑�❑ ❑❑❑Cl(fn) ❑®❑qI/S_ - Integral pivoting by-pass door allowing ��► clear line of sight through to outlet, c/w ❑ D ❑®❑®❑ 1.006 5.700 operating rope ❑®m®I❑-' 0.296 5.690 Media blasted for corrosion resistance • Variable flow rate post installation via i ❑ ®in 0.645 4.640 adjustable inlet (if necessary) rc • Indicative Weight: 20 kg ,/ ❑ ❑❑❑ = 4.939 • Product Carbon Footprint. 77.7 kgCO2e Based on a 3rd party verified EPD. hydro-int.com/epd hydro-inl,com/patents ❑ 000aat°ormn==DJD_ oELroutoJ=DD DDmoDDmDOT= m� Door: --¢Q_[a:an: ❑--D-OC-]IIOJL _-Du _lJJ_LitJJJ__ 'UJ_LL JL -O-C Ili IJOOJCCCCSI=J [IDJ ❑ ❑ ! ► N^- P • 150 I.D. OUTLET (MINIMUM) ... •. �S7-QQ JJ--J-C J7 J ED=1l__ I �- ► uu_J JJJL_JJLi [11CC7^L_m-:7D1EC CC[Il O -D_ - DCID_0C77D_J_CD DDO°--COQ°ODD LLLL L ..JJ IJJLJ____ i:' Jr .J�. DCD0DCOJJ7o0- DOJ7�OD-O L.f00 •9 , • • D_DDDm°DD DO.D nx_t , 120 240 745 'LiI''•i ❑❑❑❑®❑®® ❑❑❑❑®❑gym IMPORTANT: ®ID's®=m-�7D0I77___OU-SJOC=D--WSJ O JUN 202 :n -::1:E L-Ionoc:oo Loa:I D7-CDDIIL-O -DD=IIJ-17D-C=ED CID-OQ-m-DL mQ DO1___ DC C 7LQoa:C:C Lr017770 GL 077:00➢000 _—up FPTMr1-mflrl-rTT llT F -M r rrl-T_FF-1:-1f' CI DDDO®-OD-LD HYDRO -BRAKE IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK FOR FLOW CONTROLS DESIGNED AND MANUFACTURED EXCL0Sis/r�lrlg@ 1 q q wn HYDRO INTERNATIONAL THIS DESIGN LAYOUT IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. NO'T TO S'CAtE -•- ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Lo-❑»Cla in -'❑I ®ZSH E-0112-5700-1006-5700 ❑❑❑®❑ CTEEEEE �L-1-cEEILJ�JJSJJL77JJJ1lLLJ==EEiininL ITJC� TJCJ -=(E=F" UC 1 E:11=1❑CCT1rrMf=D1=E1 ' The use of any other flow control will invalidate any design based on this data Intern aIioIlaI and could constitute a flood risk) ❑❑❑❑ 20/05/2026 09:47 SHE -0112-5700-1006-5700 ❑EU®®[]lllfll❑® ❑❑ ❑®❑ Tydavent ❑❑❑®❑❑❑ Jake Blewitt ❑ ❑❑ 26-106 © 2026 Hydro International Ltd • Unit 2, Rivermead Court • Kenn Business Park • W,ndmlll Road • Kenn - Clevedon • BS21 6FT • Tel: 01275 878371 • Webstte: hydro-mrcorn • Entail: enquldes®hydro-IM com Jake@alantraynor.com lION AT!ON N Technical Specification Original Setting Minimum Setting Maximum Setting Control Point Head (m) Flow (us) Head (m) Flow (us) Head (m) Flow (I/s) Primary Design 1.006 5.700 1.006 4.998 1.006 6.316 Flush-FloT"' 0.296 5.690 0.438 4.477 0.266 6.718 Kick -Flo® 0.645 4.640 0.647 4.070 0.647 5.153 Mean Flow 4.939 4.098 5.621 hydro-int.com/patents 1,2 1.0 0.8 E = 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 DESIGN ADVICE DATE Site Ref © 2024 2 Flow (Ifs) 4 I Ai■�..r , wrc Gt14 14 Li tS u u ( tN L Rnn11tL1C R'II[1ly' � I The head/flow characteristics of this SHE -0112-5700-10065700 Hydro -Brake® Optimum Flow Control are unique. Dynamic hydraulic modelling evaluates the full head/flow characteristic curve. The use of any other flow control will invalidate any design based on this data and could constitute a flood risk. 20/05/2026 09:47 Jake Blewitt 26-106 oral, Rivemrd Court, Kaw Basiness Park, W r"11 Road, Kew, Clevedai, BS216FT. Tel 01275 878371 Fax 01275 874979 0.000 0.000 0.035 0.672 0.069 2.306 0.104 4.076 0.139 5.186 0.173 5.425 0.208 5.571 0.243 5.652 0.278 5.686 0.312 5.687 0.347 5.666 0.382 5.631 0.416 5.585 0.451 5.529 0.486 5.458 0.520 5.366 0.555 5.240 0.590 5.066 0.624 4.828 0.659 4.686 0.694 4.799 0.728 4.908 0.763 5.015 0.798 5.119 0.833 5.221 0.867 5.320 0.902 5.418 0.937 5.514 0.971 5.608 1.006 5.700 Hydro Iiilernatinnal SHE -0112-5700-1006-5700 Hydro -Brake® Optimum Email desigrdoc1s a©rydroint.corn PROJECT INFORMATION EIIg1EERED PRODUCT MANAGER ADS SALES REP PROJECT NO. A". Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. TYDAVNET TYDAVNET, EUROPE //ADS ICjII � FD.1-TECH- Iw` WSrAMUTD4IVSTRUCTD44 YISITDW APP 1 •m SC -800 STORMTECH CHAMBER SPECIFICATIONS IMPORTANT - NOTES FOR THE BIDDING AND INSTALLATION OF THE SC -800 SYSTEM 1. CHAMBERS SMALLBE STORMTECHSCIHA 1. STORMTECHSCBOO CHAMBERS SMALL NOT BE INSTALLED UITL THE MANUFACTURERS REPRESENTATIVE HA6 COMiETE0A PRE-OONSTRVCTION MEETON PATH THE I INSTALLERS. 2. CW.VBERS SHALL BE ARCH SWPED, M'E) SMALL BE MANUFACTURED FROM CROW ,IMPACT-MOCIFIEU. POLYPROPYLEM1E 2. STCRMTECHSCSODCHWBERS SMALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE VATH THE 'BCVCSTORMTCH CHAMBER INSTALLATION GUIDE'. COPOLYMERS. 3 CRAVBER3 SHALL MEET TE REQUIREMENTS OF 4311.4 F24HSTANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE (PP)CORRUOATED WALL STORMNATER COLLECTION CH V MBERS-. 4, CHAMBERROWS SHALL PROVIDE CONTLMWS. UNOBSTRUCTED INTERNAL SPACE, VATH NO INTERNAL SUPPORTS THATAOA.D IMPEDE FLOW OR ULOT ACCESS FOR INSPECTION. 5. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OP THE CWVSERS, THE STRUCTUTALBACKFRL, AID TIE INSTALLATIONREOUREMEWS SMALLENSURE THAT THE LOAD FACTORS SPECIFIED IN TIE MSHTO LRFOBRIOGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIO N, SECTION 12.12. ARE MET FOR: 1) LOID-0MATON DEAD LOADS. AND 2) SHORT-OIIPATION LIVE LOADS, BASED ON THE MSHRO DESIGN TEACH VAIN CONSIDERATION FOR IMPACT AND AMTPLE VEHICLE PRESENCE$. B, CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED, TESTED AJD ALLOWABLE LOAD COFIGURATIONS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE VATHABTAIF2787. 'STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTIONNCRAMSERS'. LOAD COIIFIGLAUTONS SMALL BK:LLXIE: 1)INSTANTA'.EOUS (Ei MM MSMO DESIGN TRUCK LIVE LOAD ON MINIMUM COVER, 2) MAXIMUM PERMANENT (76YR) COVER LOAD. AND 3) ALLOWABLE COVER WITH PARTIED (1-WEOQ USHTO DESIGNTRUCE. 1, REOURBIENTS FOR HANDLING RED INSTMLATON: • TO MAINTAIN THE 040TH OF CHAMBERS DURINGSHPPING AND HANDLIG, CIWWBERS SHALL RAVE INTEGRAL, INTERLOCKING STACIONG LUGS. • TOENBVREASECURE JOINT DUSAOROTALLATION MG BACKFILL. THE MIGHT OF THE CFRMEER JOINT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 2. • TOENSIRETE INTEGRITY OF THE ARCH SHAPE DURING INMSTALLATON, Q THE ARCH STIFFNESS COISTMT SMALL BE GREATER THAN OR EOUAL TO703 LBSPTI%. TE ASC IS DEFINED INSECTGN 8.2.8 OF ASRIJ F2/IB. ND h) TO RESIST CHA BER DEFORMATION DURING INSTALUTONATELEVATED TEMPERATURES (ABOVE 73' P123 C). CHAMBERS SHELL EE PRODUCED FROM REFLECTIVE GOLD OR YELLOWCOLOURS. OEAY CHARMERS THAT ME APPROVED BY THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER HALL BE ALLOWED. UPON REOVE5T BY THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER ORO'M.ER TE CHAMBER MAINFAC7URER SHALLSUSIAITA STRUCTURAL EVALUATION FOR APPROVAL BEFORE DE WEPoIG CHAMBERS TO THE PROJECT BTE AS FOLLOWS', • THE STRUCTURAL EVALUATION SMALL BE SEALED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. • THE STRUCTURAL EVALUATION SMALL DEMONSTRATE TEAT THE SAFETY FACTORS ME GREATER THANOR EQUAL TO 1.66 FOR DEAD LOAD AND 1.75 FOR LIVE LOAD, THE MHIMIUM REOLARED BY ABTA F2757, AND BY SECTION'S S NO 12.120E THE MOATS LRFD BRIDGE VISION SPECIFICATIOHB FOR THERMOPLASTIC PIPE. • THE TEST DERIVED CREEP MODULUS AS SPECIFIED IN ASTM F2416 $HALL BE USED FOR PERMANENTDEAD LOAD DESIGN EXCEPT TUT IT SHALL. BE TE 75 -TENT MODULUS USED FOR DESIOH S CHAMBERS RAID ENO CAPS SHALL BE PRODUCED AT AN ISO 6001 CERTIFIEDMOAFACTURSA3 FACIUTY. 10 MANITDIDSNE TO BE DETEIVAINED BY SITE DESKNENGINE ER SEE TECH NOTE HESS FCR AUNT TOLDSIZING GUIDANCE.DUE TO THE ADAPTATION OF THISCLAMBER SYSTEM TO SPECIFIC SITE AND DESIGN CONSTRAINTS, IT MAYBE NECESSARY TOCUTAND COUPLE ADOTIONAL NPE TOSTANOMD MANIFOLD COMPONENTSN THE FIELD. II, ADS DOES NOTOSGN OR PROVIDE MEMBRANE USER SYSTEMS. IO MINIMIZE THE LIAXAGEFOENTALOF LIVER SYSTEMS, THE MEMBRANE LINER SYSTEM SHOULD BE DESIGNED BY AXIIOWLEEGEABLE GEOTEXIU PROFESSIONAL AND 115115100 BY A QUALIFIED CONTMROR 3. CHAMBERS ARE NOT TO BE BACKFRLED IMTH A DOZER OR AN EXCAVATOR SITUATED OVER THE CHAMBERS. STORMTECH RECOMEIDB J BACKFILL MEIH005' • STONESVGOTER LOCATEDOFF THE CHAMBER RED. • SACKFILLAS ROWS ARE BUILT USING AN EXCAVATOR ON THE FOUNDATION STONE OR SU4RADE. • BACKFILLFROM OUTSIDE THE EXCAVATION USIAS A LONG BOOM HOE OR EXCAVATOR. 4. THE FOUDATION STONE SHALLBE LEVELEDAI.O COMPACTED PRIOR TOPLAC111G CHAMBERS. S. JOINTS BETWEEN CHAMBERS SHUL. BE PROPERLY SEATED PRIOR TO PLACING STONE. S MAINTAIN MNMDM- S (7500) SPACING BETWEEN THE CHAMBER ROWS. 7, EMBEDMENT STONE SURROUNDING CHAMBERS MUST BE A CLEAR,CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE OR RECYCLED COIIORETEI MSHTO 543. 3.357,4, 487, S 50, OR 57. S THE CONTRACTOR MUSTREFOAT ANY DISCREPANCIES WITHCMAMBER FOUNDATION MATERIALS BEN%NG CAPACITIES TO TIE SITE DESIGI4 ENGINEER S. ADS RECOMMEZ,DR THE ARE OF 'FLEXSTORM CATCH IT' INSERTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR ALL BEETS TO PROTECT THE SU&SUEFACE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FROM CONSTRUCTION SITE RUAGFF. NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 1. STORMTECHBC-0OOCHAMBERS BHALLBEINSTALLEDINACCORDVICEVATHTHE'SCECSTORMTECHCHAVBER INSTALLATONGUCE'. 2. THE USE OP CONSTRUCTION EOUPMENTOVER EC-0OOCRA'BERS IS UNITED • NO EOUPMENT IS ALLOWEDON BARE CHAMBERS. • NO RUBBER TIRED LOADERS, CUAMP TRUCKS OR EXCAVATORS ARE ALLOAEDU4TL PROPER FILLOEPTHS ARE REACHED IN ACCORDANCE I'ATH TAO 'SORE STORARECH CHAMBER INSTALLATION GLACE'. • ('EIGHT UM1S FOR COISTRUCTON EQUIPMENT CAI BE FOAM IN TREE 'MCC STORMTECH CHAMBER INSTALLATIONDUDE. 3. PULLS DOW-) OF BTARUSED COVER MATERIALS OVER THE CH/AMSERS IS REQUIRED FOR DUMP TRUCK TRAVEL OR IXAJPOIO. USE OF A DOZERTO PUSH EMBEDMENT STONE BETWEEN THE ROWS OFOHAMBERS MAY CAUSE DAMAOB TO THE CHAMBERS 001013 NOTAN ACCEPTABLEBACKFILL METHOD. ANY CHAMBERS DAMAGED BY THE -WRAP ANOPUSH' METHOD ARE NOT COVERED UNDER TIC STORMTECH STANDAROWAIRPANTY. CONTACTADS PATH NJY OUESTO'IS ON IIISTALLATIOA REOUREMEMS OR VFJOHTUMTB FOR CONSTRUCTION EOUPMENT. ISOLATOR ROW PLUS COMPONENTS SHOWN ON THIS DESIGN MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE IN THE SPECIFIED PROJECT REGION, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR LOCAL ADS REPRESENTATIVE OR E-MAIL ADSINTERNATIONAL@ADS-PIPE.COM FOR PROPOSED LAYOUT CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS I 1WERTAXOVE EASE CF C/WABER 6 T M PART TYPE DESCFIPTION ROES MAX FLOW OftM EA FABRIOATED EZ END CAP qA PREFABPoGTEO E2 END .PART SCSOCECF2INP OF LBJOmm CCYIECTIOKSAIDISOUTORPLUSRDWSL 110NSP000R JA _ Q U0 REOWMCAP 0 TERST0VCI.L Cl0)05,F OP P ! mm BB PEI88COVERSTQEF.'CLUDED) m TOP iFOLDItNERT: 61 FOUOESTONEBA:UMED PLU6 R01' DUMETER(610mm6UMP NlO 6516 B) 6 I RT'. Z TTO R'. 57 A TT I. 6 iTIIII1TI4 TI�-e Vi U II J ISOLATOSRUWPLLR (SEC CE OETAll7 & � PUCE ARNIMM J.SIO m OF ADSPLUSYOS VIOVEN 050150555 OVER BECQNO STOFE AND UNIEWIEATH CNAAARR FEET FOR SCOUR PROTECTION AVAIL CHUIBER lAST 60505 -BED lH.U16 NDTTES�noo76iI"taliloi7Enfs'uvDEvrisFEORV1 /,TIq ��W,pER NEWSIO?4F7PURPOBEBSONLAYTOPR�WE�WISroEPT6T�fEE REQURED6TOCPA�OEVq.U�ME GUIE BMEA j/EUQY 6ITE. SHEET 2 OF 6 ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS: STORMTECH SC -800 CHAMBER SYSTEMS AASHTO MATERIAL MATERIAL LOCATION DESCRIPTION CLASSIFICATIONS COMPACTION / DENSITY REQUIREMENT FINAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER V STARTS FROM THE PREPARE PER SITE DESIGN ENGIEERS PlAN5. PAVED O TOP OF THE V LAYER TO THEBOTTOY OF FLEXIBLE ANY 6GIJROCK MATERIALS. NAIVE 5016. OR PER ENGINEERS PLANS. N'A IN6TALIATION5MAY ROVE SIEMMATERLAL AID PAVFREIT OR UNPAVED FTNfHED GRADE ABOVE. NOTE TWAT CHECK PLANS FOR PAVEMENT SUBGRADE REOUREMENTS, PREPARATO'1 REOUREHFM6. PAVEMENT SUBBASE MAY BE PART OF THE'D LAYER AASMOMIAT' BEONNCOMPACTIONS AFTER IY (300" OF UTEOALOVER FROM NITIAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER'C STARTO S FROM THE ORMYLARAIELL.GRADED SdUAOGREGATE MIXTURES. OS% FlNES OR M1, A•2�. A•3 THECFWABERSISREACFED,CCIAPACTADOITIINALLAYER6 O TOP OFTEE EMBEOARSTOtR(BLAME T01T) PROCESSEDAGGREGATE. OR 8'(15ORm)MAX LIFTS TOA ANN. 85% PROCTOR DENSITY FOR WELL GRACED LATERAL AN09R% RELATIVE DEIWTY FOR ABOVE THE TOP OF THE CHAIBBER.IDIE THAT PAVEMENT ECHAIEE .VOTER. MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE MATERIALS CAI SE USED IN USA OF THIS FEOCESSEDAGGREGATE 4ATERULB. ROLLER 08055 6UBBASEMAYBEFP DYER MASHED MAY' VEHICLEWEIGHTNOTTO EXCEED 12.00014 (SSMB. DYNAMIC %,357,4487.5.86.57.8, 87,68.7,73, S. EMS. 10 FORCE NT TO EXCEED 2N00014(89UB. EMBEDMENT STONE: FILL SLEROUMSI,'O THE CHAMBERS AASNTO M43' B FROM THE FOUIOLTIO'N STGE IN LAYER) T TO E'C LAYER ABOVE. CLEAN, CRUSHES, ANGULAR STONE 3,357,4.467.5,58,57 ILO COMPACTION REGIME!. A FOUNDATION STONE: FILL BELOW CHAMBERS FROM THE CLEAN CRUSHED. ANXTIAAR STONE MEMO MITE COYPAOT ORROIt TO ACIBEVEA FUTSU+FACE aI SUBGRADE UP TO THE FOOT (EOTTOMN OF THE CHAYSER. 3,351.4, 457, 5, 56, 67 PLEASE 5010 I. THE USTEDMSHTODESIONA7KNNS ARE FOR CRATATION60N.Y. THE STONE MUST ALSO BE CLEAN. CRUSHED, ANGULAR. FOR EXAMPLE. ASPECIFIOATION FORMBTONEVDULD STATE:'CLEAN, CRUBHED.AIIOULAR NO.4(MSHTONIS) STONE'. 2. ETORMTECHCOANACTI011REGUREMENTSARE MET FOR A' LOCAIONIMTERIALS WHE)IRACED AND COMPAOTEOINB' (150-4 QMX)LUTE USING TVA FULLCOVERAGEB NTHANBRATORY COMPACTOR 3, VAERE IFFILTRAION SURFACES MAY SE COIAPROMISED BYCONPAOION, FOR STANDARD DESIGNLOADCOIR2ITTOAS, A FLAT SURFACEMAY BE ACHIEVED BYFWWKl OR DRAGGING YATHOUTCOMPACTIONEOUFMENT. FOR SPECIAL LOAD DESIGNS, CONTACT 6TORMTECHFOR COMPACTION REGUREMENTS. 4 ONCE LAYER'C IS PLACED, ANYSOIWATVRALCN 8E PLACEDIN LAYER V UP TO TIE FINISHED GRADE.MOSTPAVEMENT SUBBASESOLB CAN BE USED TO REPLACE THE MATEIRALRE0tAREEMS OF LAYER'C'OR'DATTHESITELESION ENNGINEERSOSCRETIgL 3, WHERE RECYCLED CONCRETE AGGREGATE I5 RESIN LAYERS'A'OR'B TIE MATERIALSHOULDALOO AEETTHEACCEPTASBITYGDTERIA OVVUIED INNTECHR,CMMOTE120'RECYCLEOCONCRETE STRUCTURAL BACENIJ.'. ADS OEOSYNTHETIC9801T N01FYA)VEN GEOTEXTOE ALL AROUND CLEAN CRUSHED, ANNOIAA( STONE PI PERIMETER STOLE (SEE NOTE 4) EXCAVATIGI WALL IAN I.., 1 (CAN BE SLOPED OR VERTICAL) 1\ it L� I2 (JOG ma)MIN SCLOOEIDCAP NOTES: 1. CHAMBERS SHALL MEETTE REOUREMENTS OFASTM F2410.'STAVOARD SPECIFICAION FOR POLYPR0PYLENE(PP) CORRUGATED WALLSTORANYATER COLLECTIONCAAMBERS'. 2. SGEC0 CHAMBERS SHALL BE DE5W14ED W ACCORDANCE WITHASTM F2TS7*STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERM0PASTICC0RRU0ATED WAIL ST0RIAWATER COLLECIONCIWAOERS', 3. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FORASSESSI G THE BEARING RESISTANCE (ALLONABLE WARMLY CAPACITY) OF THE GUSGRADE SOILS, AND TIE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE PATH CONSIDERATION FOR THE RANGE OF EXPECTED BOLL MOISTURE CONDITIONS. REFERCIRIE STGNMTECHDEBION MANUAL FOR SEARI G CAPACITY OUDAICE. 4. PEFOMETERSTOTE MUST BE EXTENDEDIDPZCFTALLY TO THE EXCAVATION WALLFOR BOTHVERTICALAID SLOPEDEXCAVAIOIIWALLS. 5. REOUREMEITS FOR HWDUNGA1D INSTALLATION' • TO MANTAN THE WIDTH OF CHAMBERS DURING SHPPIIG AND HUDUYG, CHAMBERS SHALL HAVE IINTEORAL, INTERLOCKING STEERING LOGO. • TO ENS(1REA SECURE JOINT D)RING INSTALLATION ADIMCKFILL. THEIEIGHT OF THECHA48ERJOINTSH4LLIDT BE LESS THANY. • TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THEARCHSHAPE DIR)GIINSTALLATION.A THE ARCH STIFFNESS CONSTANT SHALL BE GREATER THAN OREOUL TO 7fOLBSETI%. THE ASC IS DER1IEDINSECION 328 0FA5TM72418.AOb) TO RESISTCHIMEER DEF RUIOINOLRIGINSTFLATIONAT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES(ABOVE7'J' F123',ANDC) CFUAEERS SHAL SE PRODUCED FROM REFLECTIVE GOLD ORYELLOWCOLCAIRS. Ergs 111010 iL E SHEET 3 OF 6 STORMTECH HOLY RECOMAEIIIM FLEXSTORM INSERTS INANY UPSTREAM STRUCTURES 55114 OPEN ORATES ELEVATED BYPASS NMIFOLD SUP CEPTH TODDY SITE DIESIGN ENSIEER (24 150D mm) MAN REMMEIAEO) INSTALL F V JAP OL N 24' (SOD mm) ACCESS PIPE PIRTF:SCB0E24RAMP SC -TAO CHAMFER 24DOS OR) ROPE ACCESS PIPE REDURED USEEI EI.'D CAP PARTS SCSDCECE2 OPVOI)YL INSPECROI POST SGN ] EIA CAP ONE LAYER OF ADSPLLA82S WOVEIJ OEOTEXTIU BETWEEN FOUNDATION STOLE AIC CHAMBERS PITS RI MW WIDE CCfMMU0IJ5 FABRIC WITHOUT SEARS SC -800 ISOLATOR ROW PLUS DETAIL ISOLATOR ROW PLUS COMPONENTS SHOWN ON THIS DESIGN MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE IN THE C: ,., n lED PROJECT REGION. PLEASE CONTACT YOUR LOCAL ADS REPRESENTATIVE OR E-MAIL ADSINTERNATIONAL@AADS-PIPE.COI.1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE STEP1) INSPECT ISOLATOR ROW PLUS FOR$ED MENT A INSPECTIONPORTS IF PRESENT) Al. REMOVEPOPEIILIDOI NYLORAST INIDIE DRAIN At. RENOVEANOCLEANFLEXSTORM FILTERIF INSTALLED AT USING A FLASMIOHTM40 STADIA ROD, MEASURE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT MA RECORD ON MMSTEHN'CE LOO Al. LOWER A CNAERA INTO ISOLATOR ROVPLUS FOR VISUAL INSPECTION OF SEDISENT LEVELS (0PTIOUL) AS. IF SEDIMENTIS AT. OR ABOVE. T (S0 OR) PROCEED TO STEP TIP NOT, PROCEED TO STEPS. B. ALLISCLATOR PLUS ROWS &I. REMOVE COVER FROM STRUCTURE AT UPSTREAM END OF ISOLATOR ROW PLUS 52, USING AFLASWUOM. INSPECT DOVM TIE ISOLATOR ROW PLUS THROLAHOLJRET APE B MIRRORS DNFOLE60R CAMERAS MAY BE USED TOAVDDACO)FINED SPACE EIITRY L) FOLLOW OSHA REGULATIONS FOR CONIFPIED SPACE ENTRY P ENTERING MAMIOLE 8.3. IF SEDIMENT IS AT. OR ABOVE. 3' (00 RA) PROCEED TO STEP 2.IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. STEPS) CLEAN OUT ISOLATOR ROYPLW 05YIOTHE ATVACPROCESS A A FIXEDCLLVERTCLEAV41ANOULE WITH REAR FACIA SPREAD OF4S(I.I .)OR MORE IS PREFERRED & APPLY MULTIPLE PASSES OF JETVAC DISTIL BACAPLUSH WATER IS CLEMI C. VACWM STRUCTURE SLJVP ASREOURED STEP 3) REPLACE ALL COVERS, GRATES, FILTERS. ARE UDS; RECORD OBSERVATIONS AND ACTIOTAS. STEP 4) INSPECT ANA CLEAN BASINS ANA MAISALES LPSTREAM OF THE STORMTECH SYSTEM NOTES 1. INSPECT EVERY E MONTHS DNRNA THE FTR3TYEAR OFOPERATTOIN ADJUST THE INSPECTION IITERVALBASED ON PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS OF SEDIMEIIT ACCLRR1LAT10N AND HONWATER ELEVATIONS, 2. COTSOSUTJETITIAAIAVACTORIAANIWALLYORIWEIIINSPEOT)ONSNOAVS THAT NAIITEINNCEISIIEOESSARY. Q}Q MONAGHAN CO. COUN PLANNING SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FURTHER INFORMATIG SWEET 4 OF 6 SC -800 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION NTS OVERLAP (NUT CIWASER HERE (OVER SIMLLCORRUOAAdd II; y ux 1 START 12P' I—iI5SlIf61mN ---1� plomm> G BLMOROWINTHSO(RECT10N i.--- M4'(2160 mm) INSTALLED LEIIOTH —� I.— 1128$ ) SON (0]01 mm)ACTUALLENOTH — -�:`--- NOMNAI_CUE e e ECIF SIZE (V!%HXII TALLEDLENOTIT 51FXOO.O'X55A' (1295—XBJsoX21ESmm) CH SABER STORAGE SO.S Cl91C FEET (IAOOV) M 1A6\XA INSTALLED STORAGE 78ACLBIC FEET (2.22 ,41 MONT 519bf. (31.1L( NOMNAL EMS CAP SPECIFICATIONS SIZE RYXH%IIIb7ALIEDLFNGTH) 45.6'X32.NX(OF (115100%52500X25700) EACI CAP STORAGE 3.4 CUBIC FEET I.115MAA INSTALLED STORAGE.. 14.7 CUBIC FEET (0.42 M) WEIGHT 16.75.. (7.1(3) • ASSLM/ES N (15000) STORE 0010 01(0 BELOW 3' (75040) BETWEEN CHAYEERS ' ASSL.AIER N (160 mm) 6Td1E ABOVE RAND BELOAYE7A CAP0. 0' (M mm) BEMEEII ROWS, IC (300 mm) SEYOXS EVOCAPS PRE.COREO HOLES AT BOTTOM OF TIC CAP FOR PART 1ILO/SERS EIDINO NITH'BPC PRE.DOREO HOLES AT TOP OF EIXSCAP FOR PART NUVSERS ENdNO V•1TH'TPC PARTN STUB B C SCSOOEPEO0PC SC&ECPEOBTPC B((SO 1" 21 •(54400) — SF p-mny SC500EPEOBEPC SCSOOEPE5SPO e (2aonm> (5%(404 mm) — 1B•a65PN SCBCOEPEIOTPC SCSWEPEIOBFC 10'(35000) 17.0'45200) — 13•(-0r0 SCe00EPE12TPC SCSAEPE13BFC 12•(30000) 14A'(365100 — A 4(0P0 SC00EPEIUPC SC4OOEPEISBPC 15'1376 mm) 1.-(217 mmI — 1.7'(45 mm) 5C500EFE(57PC SC5WEPE15BPC 1e•Nsomm 0.0'(20200) — 20'(51 mm) 6CAMPE248PC 24'Imm) 2.7 (60 mm) SCe00EPE NONE 8000 ENO GAP NOTE', ALL rAyENsWN5 ARE NOMIJAL SHEET 6 OF 6 NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN 506 IIREGRATED DUCTILE IRON 766042 6 GRATE(DWO TO MATCH BMW OD. �' -_�\ IC ABOVE) MN 1143110 \ MSMOH30CWJCRETE SLAB CO! MWM4021014 IT (305mm) MAN TRAFFIC LOADS' CONCRETE DIMENSIONS (FORAAAHTO" AREJAL OUOEUNEPLPOBESOILY. ACTUALCOUGRETE 6LABMUSTBE INVERTAGIXMDING TO DESIGNED GM7O OD.'ISIDERATION FOR PLWBRAKE 110 / LOCAL SOIL CONDITIONS, TRAFFIC LOADING, f AIDOTHERAPPUGBSAR.EO-NPACTORS 00006 110 T PLANS ABLE O' -J50' ACCORDING TO PWIS VMBABLE GUAR DEPTH AOCORDIIIO TOPLANS IF 10 (25imO 400 ,,,) 111106 62 5 0 (720 50 rr.)) )• (20(200(25 TYPES OFIILETANO \ A' 102 mm) MN ON 8.2f(200& N OUTLET ADAPTERS AVALABLE: 6 (152 mn) MN ON 50' (750 mm7 6M ((0.750 mm) FOR C0RRUGATEDIOPE WATERTIGHT JOINT` BACITILL MATERIAL BELOW AND TO SIDES (COWWATED H1O\)PE SHOWN) A OF 8704007400E 6HVl EE 05004 02524 ^'^'5�" CLASS 1OR ICRUS/ED 8TO`E OR I ORAVE AID BE PIACED UICORSLY IN IT GRAVEL U FTS, AND COMPACTED TO M N OF SO% NOTES 1. 8.00' 1200-700,02) ORATE&EOUD COVERS 5HALL BE DUCTILE WON PER 0500 40536 GRACE 708605 2. 1200 (506750 m) FRAMES SHALL EE DUCTILE 180)5 006 ANTS) 0006 GRADE 708005 5. DRMIIMSNITOSE CUSTOM.WIUFACTVREDACCORDINO TO PUN CETALB 4, DRAINAGE CONNECTIONSTUS JOINT TIGHTIESS SHALLCOIFORMTOASTMDS212 FOR CORRUiATED16PE ((06 8 601000 DEAL WALL) L SOR 55 PVC 5. FORCOMPLETE DESIGN ANOPEOOUCTIIFORAUTION: WWW.NYLOPLAST.)LCOM S. TO ORDER CALL: 600.114110 A PART # ORATE/SOLID COVER OPTIONS 260500 PEDEBWM LIGHT 6TAN1 000HT SOLID LIGHT DUTY (]oO rNnl 2eiaG PEOESTRIANLIDH7 STAII3000UGHT SOLID LIGHT DUTY R�m IT 284200 PEDESTRIAN STANMROMSHTO SOLID (20600)MSHTOK/D K20 MBHTOH-20 16' 261500 PEDESTRAI STAIDAROAA0HTO SOLID (J76 rtm) 0(46610 15.10 K20 M6Hf0 K20 IF 2615)0 PEDESTRIAN STAIIDAROMSHTO SOLID 1050100)M6MOKID K20 AASHTOK20 26' 262400 PEDESTRIAN 6TADAROMOHTO SOLID (800 mm) AASH7OKID 44.20 M6HTOK30 J0 2630)0 PEDESTRIAN 6TANDARDM0070 SCUD (200,74)M557TOH00 0-20 MSM7OKi0 S W S (S 0 z SHEET 6 OF 6 r------ --y - .-..-.-----� L1?i ••• !"Rig is'.BANG^wo'n9xm wn-,.�tYf-.T:IxI'l L',;.?d:u3Inw.!11U�.-. I6 �7YgA I ICI I7� IARRIII I � I��Ir►�� II�I�IIY��IIIIIrIIII�Is'�fl�lll�IRJ'I�I� �ll tl��lll l I SPSCO ISOLATOR ROW PLUS OETPIL �•,-.>.,..... .>. >,.,.,...�,,..,,,n+. rep. O�\a��0 _It ___________ N1�0 SQPC�\�1E � e� _iJ1j d1 �o F }QQ n ,n em,cnw,rnn, eecrvnn,,,nu r ACCUTAILE fill MAIflIAU' OTCAMTKMhC WCWWPECYOT!M5 CC1tfYTFxI.e2H DETAIL 5 CET 1 OF I Appendix C — Foul Water Calculations MO7NAGH, N CO. PLANN:t4G SECTION 10 JUN 2026 FWITHER INFORMATI0r Alan Traynor Consulting I File: Flow Rev B,pfd I Page 1 Network: Foul Network 1- Causeway I Liam McElgunn 20/05/2026 Design Settings Frequency of use (kDU) 1.00 Minimum Velocity (m/s) 0.71 Flow per dwelling per day (I/day) 4000 Connection Type Level Soffits Domestic Flow (I/s/ha) 0.0 Minimum Backdrop Height (m) 0.600 Industrial Flow (I/s/ha) 0.0 Preferred Cover Depth (m) 1.350 Additional Flow (%) 0 Include Intermediate Ground J Nodes Name Dwellings Cover Diameter Easting Northing D the F( —)A,• Level (mm) (m) (m) ) p I ry4 L'4AI 'v (m) .: "� f Fl 1 101.500 1200 1105012.366 525830.430 /1.500�� F2 F3 101.000 99.800 1200 1200 1105019.651 1105058.376 525819.306 1.500 525816.53 1.750 0 F4 97.300 1200 1105094.639 525813.32', 1.500 uN ?0 'J19 Fext 94.850 1200 1105125.271 525806.4'S Links 1'4/po Name US DS Length ks (mm) / US IL DS IL Fall Slope Dia Node Node (m) n (m) (m) (m) (1:X) (mm) 1.000 F1 F2 13.. � / 1.500 100.000 99.500 0.500 26,6 150 1.001 F2 F3 38.824 1.500 99.500 98.050 1.450 26.8 150 1.002 F3 F4 36.400 1.500 98.050 95,800 7.250 16.2 150 1.003 F4 Fext 31.404 1.500 95.800 93.500 2.300 13.7 150 Name Pro Vel Vel Cap Flow US DS Z Area F Dwellings f Units E Add Pro Pro @ 1/3 Q (m/s) (I/s) (us) Depth Depth (ha) (ha) (ha) Inflow Depth Velocity (m/s) (m) (m) (ha) (mm) (m/s) 1.000 0.204 1.703 30.1 0.0 1.350 1.350 0.000 1 0.0 0.0 5 0.291 1.001 0.204 1.697 30.0 0.0 1.350 1.600 0.000 1 0.0 0.0 5 0.290 1.002 0.222 2.185 38.6 0.0 1.600 1.350 0.000 1 0.0 0.0 4 0.339 1.003 0.242 2.379 42.0 0.0 1.350 0.000 1 0.0 0.0 4 0.329 Pipeline Schedule Link Length Slope Dia Link US CL US IL US Depth DS CL DS IL DS Depth (m) (1:X) (mm) Type (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) 1.000 13.297 26.6 150 Circular 101,500 100.000 1.350 101.000 99.500 1.350 1.001 38.824 26.8 150 Circular 101.000 99.500 1.350 99.800 98.050 1.600 1.002 36.400 16.2 150 Circular 99.800 98.050 1.600 97.300 95.800 1.350 1.003 31.404 13.7 150 Circular 97.300 95.800 1.350 94.850 93.500 Link US Dia Node MH DS Dia Node MH Node (mm) Type Type Node (mm) Type Type 1.000 F1 LOU7 Manhole Ac? :,, ;,; . F2 1200 Manhole Adoptable 1.001 F2 1200 Manhole Adoptable F3 1200 Manhole Adoptable 1.002 F3 1200 Manhole Adoptable F4 1200 Manhole Adoptable 1.003 F4 1200 Manhole Adoptable Fext 1200 Manhole Adoptable Simulation Settings Analysis Speed Normal Drain Down Time (mins) 240 Skip Steady State x Foul Event Duration (mins) 30 I Flow+ v14.0 Coovright © 1988-2026 Causeway Technologies Ltd I Alan Traynor Consulting I File: Flow Rev B.pfd I Page 2 Sji �0 Causeway Network: Foul Network $W= Liam McElgunn Storm Durations 15 30 60 120 180 240 360 480 600 720 960 1440 Pre -development Discharge Rate Site Makeup Greenfield Growth Factor 30 year 1.65 Greenfield Method IH124 Growth Factor 100 year 1.96 Positively Drained Area (ha) 0.118 Betterment (%) 0 SAAR (mm) 1021 QBar 1.2 Soil Index 5 Q 1 year (I/s) 1.0 SPR 0.53 Q 10 year (Its) 1.6 Region 11 Q 30 year (Its) 1.9 Growth Factor 1 year 0.83 Q 100 year (Its) 2.3 Growth Factor 10 year 1.37 Pre -development Discharge Volume Site Makeup Greenfield Return Period (years) 100 Greenfield Method FSR/FEH Climate Change (%) 0 Positively Drained Area (ha) 0.118 Storm Duration (mins) 360 Soil Index 5 Betterment (%) 0 SPR 0.53 PR CWI Runoff Volume (m3) I Flow+ v14.0 Copyright © 1988-2026 Causeway Technologies Ltd Alan Traynor Consulting I File: Flow Rev B.pfd I Page 3 Network: Foul Network Causeway Liam McElgunn Results for Foul Event Critical Storm Duration. Lowest mass balance: 100.00% Node Event US Peak Level Depth Inflow Node Flood Node (mins) (m) (m) (I/s) Vol (m3) (m3) Foul Event F1 1 100.000 0.000 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 Foul Event F2 1 99.500 0.000 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 Foul Event F3 1 98.050 0,000 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 Foul Event F4 1 95.800 0.000 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 Foul Event Fext 1 93.500 0.000 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 Link Event US Link DS Outflow Velocity Flow/Cap Link Discharge (Upstream Depth) Node Node (us) (m/s) Vol (m3) Vol (m3) Foul Event F1 1.000 F2 0.0 0.000 0.000 0.0000 Foul Event F2 1.001 F3 0.0 0.000 0.000 0.0000 Foul Event F3 1.002 F4 0.0 0.000 0.000 0.0000 Foul Event F4 1.003 Fext 0.0 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.0 Co.(; aiUN .Il. PLANNC SECTION 1 0 JUN 2026 FWITHER INFO7,1MAT Flow+ v14.0 Copyright © 1988-2026 Causeway Technologies Ltd Appendix D — Water Protection Plan Checklist PLd6NNINGSECTIC,N GJL 10 _y UJ 2026 MONAGHAN LOCAL AUTHORITI Environment Protection Plan Checkti'st_ ER INFO�MATFON This is a checklist to be completed by applicant to be backed up by an appropriate level of detail depending. To be accompanied by a Site Drainage Plan — as set out in the Monaghan County Development Plan 2025 — 2031. General Site and Water Body Details Planning Ref. No. 2572 Applicant Tydavnet Townland Tydavnet Water Supply Source Group water scheme X Co-ordinate' 663959 Y Co-ordinate 1 839125 WFD River Sub Catchment' 03_6 WFD River Sub Basin' IE NB 03B010510 WFD River Waterbody latest Status' Status Year WFD River Waterbody Risk' Not at risk Good 2024 WFD River Waterbody Objective' Good Ecological status Groundwater Vulnerability Low Aquifer Importance Locally important Proximity to sensitive receptors (Private Wells, Public and Private Water Supply Sources, Amenity Areas, SPA's, SAC's, NHA) (meters) 100m N Proximity to nearest watercourse (culverted or open), wetland or lake (meters) Mullantimore 200m S Existing EPA Licence (insert licence no) N/A Existing Section 4 licence (insert licence no) N/A Proposed Development Is the development entirely or part of one of the following? (tick) Domestic dwelling X Agricultural (cattle/dairy) X Industrial -food related X Public Works X Agricultural (mushrooms) X Industrial -non food X Housing X Agricultural (poultry) X Quarrying/extractive industries X Institutional Yes Agricultural (piggery) X Transport related X Commercial/Retail X Other agricultural — specify below X Filling station/Fuel depot X Mixed Use Development X Other X Waste Permit X Type of wastewater Produced by the proposed development (tick) No wastewater produced No Domestic type waste waters <5m3 per day Yes Domestic type waste waters >5m3 per day" No Waste waters produced from any trade, food, preparation or business No Wheel wash, vehicle wash, cooling waters' No Waste waters produced from quarrying etc" No Other waste waters" No Have proposals for Wastewater Management during the operational phase and full details of same been included with the application? (tick) Public Sewer Connection details (Uisce Eireann) Yes Existing Wastewater Treatment System No Proposed new on site wastewater treatment system No No wastewater generated No Have proposals for Waste Facility aftercare and use been included with the application? (tick) Agricultural Improvement Plan where applicable No Closure plan and aftercare details No Proposed water sampling locations clearly identified No License or Lease agreement for the site if not owned by the applicant. No Fuel or Outdoor Material Storage for Non -Domestic Developments - operational phase (tick) Number of fuel storage tanks existing or proposed on site? N/A Are fuel storage tanks bunded 5? N/A Any liquid / feedstuffs / organic / chemical / waste oil storage on outdoor sites ? N/A Proposals for protection of water receptors during the Construction Phase Has a CEMP relating to water protection and waste management been included with the application? N/A Name of person appointed to oversee the implementation of the CEMP. N/A Hard Surface and Open Yard Areas for Non Domestic Developments (tick) Footprint of proposed development including yard areas in m2 2144 m2 Is there potential for soiled yard areas from material, product waste or manure handling, fuel dispensing, silt and soil, yard washing etc. No If yes, are silt trap(s), interceptor(s), soiled water tanks or other control measures shown on drainage plan? No Has the use of SUDS (Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems — http]/yiww.susdrain.org ) been included in the design of this development? Yes Development History — All Developments (tick) Have previous pollution prevention planning conditions been complied with 6? N/A Does existing development have an up to date (as constructed) site drainage plan? No Is the existing/proposed development sewered or unsewered? Sewered If unsewered, is the existing wastewater treatment system fit for purpose'? N/A Has the storm water drainage system been examined and/or surveyed for misconnections? Yes is there an existing Certificate of Registration or Waste Facility Permit at the site? No Checklist of items to be included on the Site Drainage Plan (tick) Location of lakes, watercourse, wells used for water supply, or karst features on or within 25m of domestic or 100m of non -domestic development site N/A Location of all clean drainage outfall points Yes Foul water drainage system (in Red) Yes Storm water drainage system (in Blue) Yes Soiled yard area, soiled water drainage and management system Storm water management system, including silt traps, oil interceptor(s) and SUDS facilities Yes Location of waste water treatment facilities N/A Location of fuel storage tank(s) Stream/Lake/Wetland/Riparian Corridors/Wells N/A Footnotes and Useful Information 'Projection in the Irish Grid 2WFD information available online at www.catchments.ie WFD mapping available online at https://gis.epa.ie/EPAMaps/Water 3Available in the groundwater mapping section www.asi.ie 'If a trade effluent or discharge >5m3 of domestic type wastewater to ground is proposed a Section 4 discharge licence may be required https://monaghan.ie/environment/discharge-licences/ Proposals for wastewater treatment shall be sufficient to demonstratethat the discharge will not cause deterioration in water quality of the receiving water body in accordance with the requirements of the European Communities Environmental Objectives (Surface Waters) Regulations 2009 as amended and the European Communities Environmental Objectives (Groundwater) Regulations 2010 as amended. 'Guidance on Best practice for Oil Storage (BPGCS05) and note requirements of Building Regulations. 6Have previous planning conditions been complied with e.g. Has certification of installation for previously granted wastewater treatment system been required and if so, has it been submitted with this application. 'Refer to EPA Guidance at: https://www.epa.ie/publications/compliance--enforcement/waste- water/2021_CodeofP ractice_We b. pdf 8 Refer to Water Body, Sensitive Waters and Sensitive Land Maps in the Monaghan County Development Plan 2025-2031. Abbreviations WFD Water Framework Directive SAC Special Area of Conservation SPA Special Protection Area NHA Natural Heritage Area EPA Environment Protection Agency CEMP Construction Environmental Management Plan For Office Use: Sensitivity of Location — Is the development located upstream of a high river quality site 8? Is the development located within a good status waterbody 8? Is the development located in the catchment of a water supply source 8? Is the development located within the Source Protection Zone (SPZ) of a groundwater supply source 8? Does the development require a discharge licence to surface or ground waters under the Water Pollution Acts? Risk to waters in relation to scale of development, previous planning/environmental history, IPPC or EIA aspects, site management and location in a sensitive area Applicant Tydavnet Community Agent: Alan Traynor Consulting Engineers Ltd Date 19/05/2026