Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2660273 - Submission - [E] Kilian CoyleC" ✓' 1c CIVIL S STRUCTURAL Planning Department, Monaghan CoCo, Dublin St, Monaghan Town Email: planning@monaghancoco.ie �� ,1�;.NN NG 3 ,.: CT bN 0 4 AUG 2026 k- l}I� oO121 Our Ref: 2611326PCER001 Your Ref: Client(s): Ciaran Mc Carron Property: Kilnacloy, Monaghan Town Regarding: Planning Permission Submission Application Ref No: 2660273 Dear Sirs, tel: +353(0)4772175 No.3 High Street, email: info@coylecs.ie Monaghan, w.coylecs.ie Co Monaghan H18X635 3rd August 2026 We have been contacted by Mr Ciaran Mc Carron in relation to Planning Permission Ref no 2660273 submitted on the 1st July 2026 under the name Moffett Investment Holdings. Mr Mc Carron has raised concerns with regard to a number of items with the submitted application, these concerns have been detailed below and we would ask that they be addressed as part of the application process. 1. Site Boundary and Ownership Extents Mr Carren is in the ownership of the lands contained within The submitted application site area bounds Mr Mc Carron's property to the north east. From the information available to our office it would appear as though the extent of the red line boundary extends into We request that the red line boundary be reviewed to ensure the extent of does not encroach into 2. Boundary Levels The application detail includes for a number of site cross sections. It is noted that Section A -A interacts with Mr Mc Carron's boundary to the south west of the section. The section indicates that the ground levels are to rise by approx 2m adjacent to Mr Mc Carrons boundary yet it is not not clear as to how this level difference is to be dealt with. STRUCTURAL C I V I L F I R E director: Peter Coyle company reg. no. 643522 Section E -E also interacts with Mr Mc Carron's boundary to the south west of the section. From the section provided it is also not clear as to how the boundary is to be dealt with. We request that detail of how the boundary between Folio's are dealt with addressing any planting or retaining structures that are required. 3. Existing Vegetation and Trees The existing boundary treatment between Folios consist of mature trees and vegetation which provide a screened boundary between the 2no folios. The Landscape Layout as submitted makes reference to Existing trees and hedges at site boundary to be retained where possible. We request that all mature trees and vegetation along the boundary between the above folios be retained as part of any grant of permission and that measures be put in place to ensure the design and construction stage of the works include for adequate protective measures. Trusting the above is to your satisfaction should you have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours sincerely, Peter Coyle, CEng, BEng MIEI, Chartered Engineer