Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2560432 - F.I. Received Doc. - Stage 1/2 RSA Report Residential Development at, Tully, MonaghanTown, Co. Monaghan Our Ref: 4765 Stage 1/2 RSA Report Date: 21/07/2026 RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | i Project Document Control Sheet Residential Development,Tully,Monaghan Town, Co.Monaghan Project No. 4765 Document Title Stage 1/2 RSA Report Document Ref. D01 Rev Distribution Comments Author Checked Approved Day Month Year 0 CS Pringle DRAFT GJB DL GJB 21 July 2026 1 CS Pringle FINAL GJB DL GJB 23 July 2026 Contents No. of Pages Cover Page 1 Control Sheet 1 Table of Contents 1 Text 15 Table of Tables 0 Table of Figures 0 No. of Appendices 3 (4 pages) Total no. of Pages 22 RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | ii Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 2. ITEMS RESULTING FROM THIS STAGE 3 AUDIT .................................................... 3 3. COMMENTS ................................................................................................................... 14 4. AUDIT TEAM STATEMENT ........................................................................................ 15 APPENDIX A – List of drawings and documentation ............................................................ 16 APPENDIX B – Marked up Drawing with Indicative Locations of Problems ....................... 17 APPENDIX C – RSA Feedback Form .................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This report examines the road safety aspects of the proposed residentialat Residential Development, Tully, Monaghan Town, Co. Monaghan. The study was carried out between 03rd ofJuly 2026 and the 21st ofJuly2026 in the offices of DCE Irl. 1.2 The Audit Team members were as follows: - Team Leader: Gary J. Barron BSc. NCEA Dip Const. NCEA Cert. C. Eng MIEI, HA RSA Cert Comp Chartered Engineer, DCE Irl Team Member: Brian ByrneB.Sc. (Hons)Civil Engineer Observer 1.8 Appendix C contains designer's comments provided by CS Pringle. : Caoimhin FieldsB.Eng. (Hons), MScCivil & Traffic Engineer 1.3 The audit comprised an examination of the drawings and other information relating to the scheme supplied by CS Pringle. A visit to the site of the proposed scheme was made on 21/07/2026 in daylight hours. The weather was dry. Traffic conditions were moderate. This Stage 1/2 Audit has been carried out in accordance with the relevant sections of GE-STY-01024 (Road Safety Audit) and TII Document GE-STY-01027 (Road Safety Audit Guidelines). The team has examined only those issues within the design relating to the road safety implications of the scheme, and has therefore not examined or verified the compliance of the design to any other criteria. The comments section of the report includes observations by the audit team that if unaddressed by the design team may ultimately become a safety risk and thus should be given consideration in the design process. 1.5 Appendix A describes the drawings and other information examined by the Audit Team. 1.6 All of the problems described in this report are considered by the Audit Team to require action in order to improve the safety of the scheme and minimise collision occurrence and severity. A previous Road Safety Audit of the scheme was carried out in May and October 2024. 1.7 The drawings contained in Appendix B shows indicative locations of the problems. The location numbers refer to the problem numbers in this report. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 2 FIGURE 1 INDICATIVE SITE LOCATION RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 3 2. ITEMS RESULTING FROM THIS STAGE 3 AUDIT – Please also refer to the plans in Appendix B of this report which highlight the indicative locations of the problems 2.1 Problem: Location: Drawing 6229-PL-24-001 Summary: Sightlines Sightlines have not been delineated on the design drawings internally within the scheme correctly. Sightlines are to be measured to kerb lines and from the centre of the road with a 2.4m setback. The cumulative effect of infrastructure and landscaping can lead to sightlines being obscured possibly leading to pull out type collisions where adequate visibility is not provided for. Recommendation Sightlines are to be detailed on design drawings and visibility is to be provided in both directions in accordance with DMURS at all internal junctions. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 4 2.2 Problem: Location: Drawing 6229-PL-24-001 Summary: Adjoining access An existing access is located to the south of the proposed entrance. This access appears to be the rear access to a number of houses in the Tully Estate. The number of vehicles using this access is unknown. Vehicle conflict may occur with vehicles entering and exiting the two junctions’ side by side and vehicles from one access may enter the other on the wrong side of the road, leading to head-on collisions. Recommendation Cul de sac signage should be erected at the entrance. Adequate signage should be provided to the new housing scheme. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 5 2.3 Problem: Location: Drawing 6229-PL-24-001 Summary: Adjoining access An existing access is located to the south of the proposed entrance. This access appears to be the rear access to a number of houses in the Tully Estate. The existing sightlines to the north from this access appear to be below what would be appropriate for an access based on the operational speed of the road. Where sightlines are adversely affected from this access by the proposed development, this may lead to pull out type collisions. Recommendation Sightlines from this access are not to be adversely affected by the proposed works. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 6 2.4 Problem: Location: Drawing 6229-PL-24-001 Summary: Desire line to shop and KR Hire An existing access is located to the east of the proposed access on the opposite side of the R162. The new access creates a desire line to the shop for residents of the new estate. An existing controlled pedestrian is located to the south of the new access. This crossing is detailed on the design drawing, tactile paving is noted to be added. The crossing has no tactile paving at present, where incorrect tactile paving is provided,this may lead to confusion for partially sighted pedestrians leading to them being unaware of the crossing and crossing the road at undesignated locations where they are in danger of being struck by vehicles. Recommendation At detailed design stage tactile paving is to be detailed at the existing pedestrian crossing on the design drawings to ensure the works take this crossing into consideration and the works ‘tie in’ correctly, the road markings and crossing should be ‘refreshed’. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 7 2.5 Problem: Location: Drawing 6229-PL-24-001 Summary: Desire lines. Desire lines exist within the scheme and to the large central green area. Crossing points have not been detailed on the design drawings at all junctions. Where adequate crossing points have not been provided this will result in less-abled users being unable to cross the road or lead to pedestrians with buggies having difficulty in crossing the road leading to collisions. Crossing points located opposite driveways may lead to collisions as inattentive drivers exit their driveways colliding with pedestrians at the crossing. Recommendation Adequate crossing points should be provided on desire lines within the scheme and link with footpaths/walkways within the green area. Crossing points should not coincide with driveways. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 8 2.6 Problem: Location: Drawing 6229-PL-24-001 Summary: Tactile Paving/Drop kerbs Crossings with Tactile paving/Drop kerbs are located remote from the junctions. This will result in vulnerable road users not using the designated crossings and may lead to collisions between vulnerable road users and vehicles. Recommendation Crossing points and tactile paving is to be provided in accordance with current best practice closer to the desire line at junctions. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 9 2.7 Problem Location: Drawing 6229-PL-24-001 Summary: Junction with R162 Corner radii at the junction with the R162 appear quite wide and appear to be as per the Recommendations for Site Development works 1998. The corner radii do not appear to be consistent with the more recent document DMURS. Excessive junction radii can lead to excessive speed through the scheme leading to collisions between vehicles and collisions with pedestrians Recommendation Tighter corner radii should be adopted to slow vehicle speeds in accordance with DMURS. 2.8 Problem Location: Drawing 6229-PL-24-001 Summary: Site wide Road Signage is not shown on the drawings issued to the Audit Team. The absence or the erroneous use of such signage may confuse road users and lead to collisions. NoSpeedlimitsignageisshownthroughoutthedevelopmentsuchas‘30km/hr’.Lackofsign agecouldincreasethelikelihoodofexcessivespeedsintheresidentialdevelopmentresultin ginanincreasedriskofvehicular/VulnerableRoadusercollisions. Recommendation The location and type of road signage shall be provided at detailed design stage. A ‘30km/hrSLOWZONE’signagebe erected within the scheme 2.9 Problem Location: Drawing 6229-PL-24-001 Summary: Site wide No details are provided for the proposed raisedtables/speed restraint, such as proposed heights, change in surfacing material or entry/exit taper gradients. Raised tables too steep may result in vehicles grounding on them causing material damage, while too low a height can result in them being ineffective and vehicles driving too fast resulting in a potential vehicular/pedestrian collision. Recommendation Itisrecommendedthatanappropriatedesignisdetailedfortheraisedtables. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 10 2.10 Problem Location: Drawing 6229-PL-24-001 Summary: Right turn Lane Right turn lanes exist on the R162. The adjustment of these road markings has been considered by the design and how they tie in upstream and downstream. However, it is unclear from the design drawings what lining is to remain in situ, lining to be replaced, lining to be refreshed and new lining. Where there is not clarity in what’s being implemented on site this can result in the absence of correct road markings which may confuse road users and lead to collisions. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 11 Recommendation At detailed design stage the adjustment of the right turn lane and other road markings shall be full detailed;including detailing the lining to remain in situ, lining to be replaced, lining to be refreshed and new lining. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 12 2.11 Problem Location: Drawing 6229-PL-24-001 Summary: Right turn Lane Right-turn lanes (RTLs) are provided along the R162. The proposed development will reduce the available stacking length within the RTL serving Glenview Drive. Insufficient stacking capacity may result in vehicles overhanging the RTL and obstructing through traffic on the mainline. This could lead to driver frustration and unsafe behaviour, such as mounting the footpath to bypass queues, thereby increasing the risk of collisions with vulnerable road users. Recommendation A detailed capacity assessment of the proposed right-turn lane (RTL) is recommended to verify that the available stacking length is adequate to cater for anticipated traffic demand without impacting mainline flow. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 13 2.12 Problem Location: Drawing 6229-PL-24-005 Summary: Waste Water Treatment System A waste water treatment system and pumping station is proposed on site. How these are to be serviced and maintained is not apparent from the design drawings as the systems are remote from the road and wwts separated by a swale. Where maintenance and service vehicles are not catered for by the proposed design this may result in conflict with other road users leading to collisions. Recommendation Access for maintenance and service vehicles is to be provided to the waste water treatment plant and desludging tankers should not be required to de-sludge from the main estate road. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 14 3. COMMENTS • Gradients within the scheme are at 1 in 12 in certain locations. • Retaining walls should be detailed on design drawings. • A new priority junction is proposed onto R132. The operational speed on the R132 appears to be above the posted speed limit. Where sightlines are provided in accordance with DMURS for the posted speed limit this may lead to pull out type collisions due to the operational speed on the mainline being higher than the posted speed limit. • HGVS are parking adjacent to the shop and partially blocking the lane. RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 15 4. AUDIT TEAM STATEMENT We certify that we have examined the drawings and other information listed in Appendix A. This examination has been carried out with the sole purpose of identifying any features of the design that could be removed or modified to improve the safety of the scheme. The problems that we have identified have been noted in the report, together with suggestions for improvement which we recommend should be studied for implementation. signed...... ____________________________________________________ Gary J. Barron, BSc. NCEA Dip Const. NCEA Cert. C. Eng MIEI, HA RSA Cert Comp DCE IRL Date............21/07/2026................... RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 16 APPENDIX A – List of drawings and documentation Title Number Site Layout 6229-PL-24-001 Services 6229-PL-24-005 RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 17 APPENDIX B – Marked up Drawing with Indicative Locations of Problems RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 7 1 . 0 72.072.073.073.073.074.074.074.07 5 . 0 75.075.076.07 6 . 0 76.076.077.077.077.078.078.078.079.079.079.080.080.080.081.081.081.082.082.083.083.084.084.086.087.0IL=86.64IL=83.93IL=81.60IL=78.86IL=76.75IL=74.37IL=73.33IL=86.64IL=83.93IL=81.60IL=78.86IL=76.75IL=74.37IL=73.33TOW:85.0683.78TOW:83.3682.89TOW:84.3682.25TOW:83.3681.4080.46TOW:82.3678.65TOW:81.8679.0TOW:80.8679.06TOW:80.8678.84TOW:80.8679.24TOW:79.8678.90TOW:86.36TOW:85.8683.522565m²Active OpenSpaceGATE74.0 7 3 . 0 72.071.081.082.076.3676.8677.3679.02678.19380.83282.31781.81781.31783.14771.5672.0672.5673.0673.5674.0674.5675.0675.4175.7676.1175.8675.8678.2678.0279.85980.59281.42580.34779.98778.89278.40578.2678.2677.9677.9678.10577.189PLAY AREASee details76.21476.34177.96578.18085.081.60281.742DKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKDK79.377TOW:77.4071.33472.8673.1673.3374.0873.1375.4375.8075.8476.2176.4475.2075.1575.4475.7675.8276.2677.0977.2179.0680.0480.7681.1781.9482.2983.8483.3882.9782.6582.2681.80C BOX65.54CL=65.3165.20CL=65.19SVPOSTPOST68.5269.4769.5668.9570.2669.6870.8770.09POSTPOST65.07FENCEWALLWALLWALLFENCEFENCEWALLWALLWALLPK LINE OFEIRCOM OVERHEADFENCEKERBFENCESIGNC BOX65.31CL=65.3165.20CL=65.19SVPOSTPOST68.5269.4769.5668.9570.2669.6870.8770.09TPPOSTPOST65.0764.9764.88FENCEWALLWALLWALLFENCEFENCEWALLWALLWALLEIRCOM OVERHEADFENCEFENCEFENCEKERBFENCEIS3IS4IS1IS278.80IS575.12IS679.2366.3566.1766.0566.0566.0966.1266.25SIGN66.2366.2166.2566.3866.5166.5665.7365.9465.79SV65.7465.6665.6365.6265.4965.3365.0864.9964.9364.8564.8064.7564.7264.6564.6064.6664.7764.8964.8164.8864.7964.81SIGNC BOX64.8464.9164.9465.00SIGN65.0765.0565.07C BOXC BOXLP65.0265.0565.0465.0865.1465.21SIGN65.0265.1665.18CL=65.1465.2165.3165.2665.41C BOXC BOXC BOXCL=65.43SVSV65.2165.57LP65.6765.80CL=65.6965.85POSTPOST65.85FFL=65.89SV65.2365.3165.4565.6465.7465.7865.8766.0166.0766.12LP66.2366.21C BOX66.0565.91CL=65.9665.9065.8365.7365.62EP65.2965.1865.1064.9964.8964.7464.7364.7364.6764.62LP64.6164.6064.4564.4764.6364.65LPSV64.4664.4464.3964.3864.4164.4264.4464.5064.5464.5764.6464.7965.12CL=64.77CL=64.51CL=64.48CL=64.49CL=64.48CL=64.5064.5364.5564.6064.6964.74CL=64.7464.8764.7664.6964.6964.5964.68POSTPOST70.72 78.8065.1865.87KERBKERBWALLCHANNELKERBKERBFENCEFENCEO/HEAD CABLEFENCEFENCEKERBKERBKERBFENCEFENCEFENCEFENCEFENCEWALLFENCEFENCEFENCEFENCEFENCEWALLFENCEFENCEFENCEFENCEFENCEFENCEDITCHO/HANGBOLLARDSTOPWALL65.05STOPTREE STUMPSHIGH TREES IN THIS AREARL=87.96EL=83.00RL=76.21EL=74.03RL=77.38EL=75.29RL=77.06EL=74.78RL=77.65EL=75.49RL=78.08EL=75.96RL=78.20EL=76.23RL=77.77EL=75.69RL=74.82EL=72.62RL=77.96EL=75.21 RL=78.30EL=75.95 EL=92.97RL=95.37EL=92.65RL=94.85EL=92.19RL=93.48EL=90.75RL=92.65EL=89.95RL=91.36EL=88.58 C BOX65.54CL=65.3165.20CL=65.19SVPOST68.5269.4769.5668.9570.2669.6870.8770.09POST65.07FENCEWALLWALLWALLFENCEFENCEWALLWALLWALLEIRCOM OVERHEADFENCEFENCESIGNC BOX65.31CL=65.3165.20CL=65.19SVPOST68.5269.4769.5668.9570.2669.6870.8770.09TPPOST65.0764.9764.88FENCEWALLWALLWALLFENCEFENCEWALLWALLWALLEIRCOM OVERHEADFENCEFENCEFENCE FENCEIS3IS4IS1IS278.80IS575.12IS679.2366.3566.1766.0566.0566.0966.1266.2566.2366.2166.2566.3866.5166.5665.7365.9465.79SV65.7465.6665.6365.6265.4965.3365.0864.9964.9364.8564.8064.7564.7264.6564.6064.6664.7764.8964.8164.8864.7964.81SIGNC BOX64.8464.9164.9465.00SIGN65.0765.0565.07C BOXC BOXLP65.0265.0565.0465.0865.1465.21SIGN65.0265.1665.18CL=65.1465.2165.3165.2665.41C BOXC BOXC BOXCL=65.43SVSV65.2165.57LP65.6765.80CL=65.6965.85POSTPOST65.85FFL=65.89SV65.2365.3165.4565.6465.7465.7865.8766.0166.0766.12LP66.2366.21C BOX66.0565.91CL=65.9665.9065.8365.7365.62EP65.2965.1865.1064.9964.8964.7464.7364.7364.6764.62LP64.6164.6064.4564.4764.6364.65LPSV64.4664.4464.3964.3864.4164.4264.4464.5064.5464.5764.6464.7965.12CL=64.77CL=64.51CL=64.48CL=64.49CL=64.48CL=64.5064.5364.5564.6064.6964.74CL=64.7464.8764.7664.6964.6964.5964.68POSTPOST70.7278.8065.1865.87KERBKERBWALLCHANNELKERBKERBFENCEFENCEO/HEAD CABLEFENCEKERBKERBKERBFENCEFENCEFENCEFENCEWALLFENCEFENCEFENCEFENCEFENCEWALLFENCEFENCEFENCEFENCEFENCEFENCEDITCHBOLLARDSTOPWALL 65.05STOPTREE STUMPSRL=87.96EL=83.00RL=76.21EL=74.03RL=77.38EL=75.29RL=77.06EL=74.78RL=77.65EL=75.49RL=78.08EL=75.96RL=78.20EL=76.23RL=77.77EL=75.69RL=74.82EL=72.62RL=78.30EL=75.95EL=92.97RL=95.37EL=92.65RL=94.85EL=92.19RL=93.48EL=90.75RL=92.65EL=89.95RL=91.36EL=88.58OPENSPACE NO.28TYPE A1FFL: 83.120NO.29TYPE A2FFL: 82.570NO.30TYPE A2FFL: 82.245NO.31TYPE A2FFL: 81.85NO.32TYPE A2FFL: 81.400NO.33TYPE A1FFL: 81.040NO.34TYPE A1FFL: 80.715NO.35TYPE A2FFL: 80.350NO.36TYPE A2FFL: 80.025NO.37TYPE A2FFL: 79.650NO.38TYPE A2FFL: 79.650NO.39TYPE A1FFL: 78.950NO.40TYPE A1FFL: 78.500NO.41TYPE A2FFL: 78.860NO.42TYPE A2FFL: 78.860NO.43TYPE A1FFL: 78.511NO.44TYPE A1FFL: 78.511NO.45TYPE A3FFL: 78.480NO.46TYPE A3FFL: 78.930NO.26TYPE B1FFL: 82.000NO.25TYPE B1FFL: 81.55NO.24TYPE B2FFL: 80.840NO.23TYPE B2FFL: 80.390NO.22TYPE B2FFL: 79.590NO.21TYPE B2FFL: 79.140NO.20TYPE B1FFL: 78.38078.230NO.19TYPE B1FFL: 77.91077.78NO.18TYPE C1FFL:77.610NO.17TYPE C1FFL: 77.160NO.16TYPE C1FFL: 76.380NO.15TYPE C1FFL: 76.050NO.48TYPE A2FFL: 77.710NO.49TYPE A2FFL: 77.260NO.09NO.08NO.10TYPE E1FFL: 75.585NO.11TYPE E1FFL: 75.910NO.13NO.27TYPE A1FFL: 83.570NO.14TYPE C2FFL: 75.570TYPE D2FFL: 74.703TYPE D2FFL:75.0281:50 1:50STOPSTOP1:50STOP AmenitySpace:63M²AmenitySpace:88M²AmenitySpace:76M²AmenitySpace:63M²AmenitySpace:91M²AmenitySpace:47M²AmenitySpace:36M²AmenitySpace:76M²AmenitySpace:84M²AmenitySpace:137M²AmenitySpace:109M²AmenitySpace:134M²AmenitySpace:137M²AmenitySpace:137M²AmenitySpace:321M²AmenitySpace:533M²AmenitySpace:324M²AmenitySpace:324M²AmenitySpace:91M²AmenitySpace:91M²AmenitySpace:80.65M²AmenitySpace:77M²AmenitySpace:88.90M²AmenitySpace:78M²AmenitySpace:71M²AmenitySpace:74M²AmenitySpace:72M²AmenitySpace:73M²AmenitySpace:71M²AmenitySpace:70M²AmenitySpace:78M²AmenitySpace:78M²RAISED JUNCTIONRAISED CROSSINGAmenitySpace:78M²AmenitySpace:77M²AmenitySpace:77M²AmenitySpace:76M²AmenitySpace:72M²AmenitySpace:72M²AmenitySpace:75M²AmenitySpace:76M²AmenitySpace:75M²AmenitySpace:72M²AmenitySpace:108M²23m x 2m sightline23m x 2m sightline23m x 2m sightline23m x 2m sightline23m x 2m sightline23m x 2m sightline(SHOP)FootpathFootpathTYPE C2FFL: 75.570NO.03TYPE D2FFL: 72.95NO.04TYPE D2FFL: 72.300TYPE D2FFL: 73.260TYPE D2FFL: 72.625NO.05NO.06TYPE D1FFL: 74.035NO.07TYPE D1FFL: 74.378TYPE D1FFL: 73.710AmenitySpace:77M²AmenitySpace:63M²AmenitySpace:88M²AmenitySpace:75M²Window LevelRSRSTPGTOP OF TREETOP OF TREETOP OF TREETOP OF TREEMHMH65.1365.1990.5789.5587.3484.8183.9884.8284.0096.58100.5596.3096.30SHEEP WIRE 1.0MSHEEP WIRE 1.0MBARBED WIRE 1.0MBARBED WIRE 1.0MBARBED WIRE 1.0MWOODEN FENCE 1.0MTREE STUMPWindow LevelWindow LevelWindow LevelWindow Levelwalking pathWATERCOURSE81.5481.1280.7580.4079.9379.9179.4078.9079.1579.1579.0279.0278.8479.2477.8877.38AmenitySpace:40M²78.92STOPNEW 1.8M PLASTERED BLOCKWORKWALL49m x 2.4m sightline49m x 2.4m sightline49m x 2.4m sightlineRAISEDCROSSINGPROPOSED REARRESIDENTIAL ACCESS GATENEW LOW LEVEL STONE WALL SETBACKEXISTING FENCE/ VEGETATION REMOVEDPROPOSED PART V DWELLINGS:·NO. 14 - TYPE C2·NO. 15 - TYPE C1·NO. 16 - TYPE C1·NO. 17 - TYPE C1·NO. 18 - TYPE C1·NO. 19 - TYPE C1·NO. 10 - TYPE D2·NO. 03 - TYPE D2·NO. 33 - TYPE A2·NO. 43 - TYPE A2TOTAL PART V DWELLINGS: 10 NO.PROPOSED BOUNDARY FENCING & SEGMENTAL RETAININGWALL - SEE LEGEND AND FENCE DETAILSPROPOSED DWELLINGSPROPOSED DWELLINGSPROPOSED ESTATE ROADAND FOOTPATHSPROPOSED BOUNDARY FENCING- SEE LEGEND AND FENCEDETAILSPROPOSED DRY SEGMENTALRETAINING WALL - SEE WALLDETAILPROPOSED OPEN GREENSPACE WITH WALKING PATHPROPOSED BOUNDARY FENCING -SEE LEGEND AND FENCE DETAILSTHROTTLED STORM SEWER(2.0 L/S) DISCHARGE TO WATERCOURSEWITH NON RETURN VALVEEXISTING LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANFOR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING & SITE SECTIONSEXISTING LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANFOR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING & SITE SECTIONSORANGE ROAD MARKINGS ARE NEWPROPOSEDSHRUBBERY/ OBSTRUCTIONS TO BEREMOVED AS REQUIREDAUGMENTED FOOTPATH49m x 2.4m sightlineTRAFFIC LIGHTS/ CROSSINGAUGMENTED FOOTPATH &EXISITNG VEGETAIONREMOVEDNEW 2M FENCE PROPOSED TO ENTIRE SOUTHERNBOUNDARY WITH EXISTING TULLY ESTATEPROPOSED DRY SEGMENTALRETAINING WALL - SEE WALLDETAILPROPOSED FENCES - SEEDETAILSNative trees and HedgingConcrete footpathEXISTINGTarmac RoadwayLEGENDGRASS/ LAWNFENCE TYPE A2M FENCE - CONCRETE H-POST, GRAVELindicative Road MarkingsTO BE RETAINED WHERE POSSIBLESee Landscape Plan for detailsFENCE TYPE AFENCE TYPE B0.9M FENCE WITH 2 NO. D-RAILS, 100MM CONCRETE POSTS(SEE DETAILS SHEET)BOARD AND VERTICAL TIMBER PANELRETAINING WALLSEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL(Height Varies - See Plan & detail)(SEE DETAILS SHEET)SITE OUTLINESITE AREA: 5.90 ac or 2.39 HAWALL TYPE CWALL TYPE D1.8M PLASTERED BLOCKWORK WALL(SEE DETAILS SHEET)1.2M STONE CLAD WALL(SEE DETAILS SHEET)DKDKDKDKDKDKDKDKTOW:81.89550077.00Retaining WallRetaining WallRetaining WallRetaining WallRetaining Wall Retaining WallRetaining WallRetaining WallRetaining WallFENCE TYPE E1.2M CHAINLINK FENCE100MM CONCRETE POSTS(SEE DETAILS SHEET)00.000= Proposed Level00.000= Proposed Level(SEE DETAILS SHEET)(SEE DETAILS SHEET)TACTILE PAVING TO BE ADDED TOTHE CROSSINGNO.47TYPE FFFL: 78.06077.91NO.02NO.0173.17AmenitySpace:211M²Permeable paving1020m²Passive Open SpaceGATEGATEGATEGATEGATEGATEGATEGATEGATEGATEBPBSTYPE E1FFL: 76.235NO.122 BED3 BEDINACCESSIBLE AREA TO BEHEAVILY PLANTED - SEELANDSCAPE PLANGATE FOR MAINTENACEBICYCLE PARKING65.29565.42065.00065.09265.21776.33576.2175.89576.48176.481TOW:78.0073.63Retaining Wall70.83670.11369.38968.66567.94267.21866.49565.7711:201:141:12 1:121:201:20TOW:75 .80Cul-DeSac SignDrawing Title:© COPYRIGHT: These drawings are the copyright of C.S. Pringle Ltd. and they must not be reproduced without consent from this company. ARCHITECTSCONSULTING ENGINEERS - BUILDING SURVEYORSMain Street, Castleblayney, Co. MonaghanP. 042-9746492 E. info@cspringle.comREV NUMBER:DESCRIPTION:DRW:CHK:DATE:FILE LOCATION:DATE:SCALES:REVISION:PROJECT TITLE:LOCATION:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWING NUMBER:STAGE:CLIENT/ARCHITECT:www.cspringle.comOriginal Sheet Size: A1REVISED SITE LAYOUTPlanning Drawing- Further InformationTULLY SITESTAGE 01 - PLANNINGGEDA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTDTULLY, CO. MONAGHANNathan AnscombeKOR6229-PL-25-00125.06.20261:500-U:\_ 1 Projects\GEDA\Geda - Tully - 6229\Architectural Project\3. Drawings\Site\CAD-----------------------------------NORTH RECEIVED: 12/08/2026 Page | 9 APPENDIX C – RSA Feedback Form SAFETY AUDIT FEEDBACK FORM Proposed Development:Stage 1/2 RSA Residential Development, Tully, Monaghan Town, Co.Monaghan Audit Stage:1/2 Date Audit Completed:21/07/2026 TO BE COMPLETED BY DESIGNER Paragraph No. in Safety Audit Report Problem accepted (yes/no) Recommended measures accepted (yes/no) Describe Alternative measure(s). Give reasons for not accepting recommended measure. 2.1 YES YES 2.2 NO Cul de sac sign noted on site plan 2.3 NO Sightlines are shown to be unaffected on-site plan 2.4 YES YES 2.5 YES YES 2.6 YES YES 2.7 YES YES 2.8 YES YES 2.9 YES YES 2.10 YES YES 2.11 YES YES 2.12 YES YES Signed: Design Team Leader Date: 22.07.2026 Signed: ________________________ Audit Team Leader Date: __23/072026____________ RECEIVED: 12/08/2026